How likely is it that electric vehicles will replace fuel trucks?

Electric vehicles, if there is no state subsidy, if many city license plates do not shake the number, if you don't promote the ban on fuel vehicles every day! How many people will buy an electric car? With the current technical level of electric vehicles, go to consult people who have bought electric vehicles, and there are a few who do not regret it!

I don't think it's good to replace fuel vehicles.

Electric cars replacing gasoline vehicles are just some people's fantasies.

Can the owner have the final say, at present, the technology is not up to it, and the conditions are not up to it, don't blow it too much.

The problem of charging, if you can run 300 kilometers in 5 minutes, then there is no problem.

So far, rickshaws and animal-powered vehicles have not been completely replaced by motor vehicles.

Insufficient battery life. The supporting facilities are not perfect. Anything is superfluous.

Electricity can't be replaced, there will be a new energy to replace it.

Whether electric vehicles can replace fuel vehicles depends on whether electric vehicles are "really competitive".

1. Overcome and solve the problem of spontaneous combustion.

Recently, there has been an increase in spontaneous combustion of electric vehicles.

Originally, there was a saying that the spontaneous combustion of fuel vehicles was higher than that of electric vehicles, and at present, this is also the actual situation. However, with the increase in the number of electric vehicles, the manufacturers are mixed, and the variety and quality are diverse, and the proportion of spontaneous combustion is likely to change. Fuel vehicles spontaneously combust, most of them are old vehicles, or vehicles that have been impacted in accidents.

The spontaneous combustion of electric vehicles is more complicated, the reason for the battery, the reason for the charging pile, etc., resulting in the new car can also spontaneously combustion, if the spontaneous combustion is not dealt with, it will definitely affect the mood of the buyer and seriously affect the development of electric vehicles.

Second, the mileage and charging facilities problems.

At present, the mileage of electric vehicles is not ideal, and it is suitable for short-distance operation vehicles of public transport vehicles operating in the city or pick-up vehicles of government agencies and logistics vehicles. If the charging pile is not perfect, it will take time for electric vehicles to enter the home, which in turn affects sales.

Third, if electric vehicles want to vigorously develop, not only the number of increases, but also the technical aspects need to make a big breakthrough, which should be said to be not ideal at present. You can't just get a few batteries, even if it's new energy, in order to eat a little subsidy, just do it. Without the development of core technologies, "replacement" is just empty talk.

In short, electric vehicles still have a long way to go to replace the status of gasoline vehicles. The existing electric vehicles should be improved, and the supporting facilities should be improved. Electric vehicles are really developed, and they will naturally replace fuel vehicles, maybe they will coexist for a period of time, and slowly transition!

If you blindly suppress fuel vehicles, and electric vehicles can't keep up, that's even more sad thing!

It may be a bit conservative to say this, hoping that electric vehicles or other new energy vehicles can have a big development breakthrough and have a bright future.

A major breakthrough in battery capacity, the harmless treatment of waste batteries, and the rapid storage of electric energy, if these three are not solved, everything is a floating cloud.

If it is given for free, it is estimated that 30 people can accept.

At present, as far as the existing battery technology is not better, it will not be replaced!

The legs of current electric vehicles are too short, and the batteries are expensive and unused.

Can't replace it, electric donkey, it's okay to commute to work, it's not okay to travel in winter and winter, and you can't make a stove in the car to take temperature.

Energy vehicle charging pile is difficult to match, charging time is long, the cost of the battery is too high, especially in many cities in the summer, floods, a power outage for more than ten days, have you considered the feelings of refueling car owners.

The composition of electric vehicles is also high, and the battery will be scrapped after a few years, and it is quite not as expensive to buy a new car as it is to replace it once.

In 20 years, the earth's oil will be in short supply, and it will be extracted in about 50 years

It's not a big deal to see two barrels of oil.

With the breakthrough development of battery technology, it is the general trend for electric vehicles to replace fuel vehicles, but there is still a long way to go to completely replace them, most passenger cars will be replaced by electric vehicles in about ten years, and trucks may take forty or fifty years.

I heard that more than 10,000 batteries will be repaid in 2020.

Replacing the battery body is too large to consider electric vehicles

According to the current point of view, the possibility of cars replacing fuel vehicles is very high, and it is also a trend, and it will not take a hundred years to replace fuel vehicles.

If you have a car, you can imagine when you go out

The ideal is very plump, the reality is cold, first of all, the problem of the charging pile, a charging pile can draw several cars a day to charge, even if your car is fast charging, if your car is charged during working hours, full of who will move the car for you to let others charge, and go to work your car down who can move the car to the charging pile during working hours to charge, and your car will not be fast charging it. Just roughly calculate, how many charging piles are there?

There is no major breakthrough in battery technology, everything is fake.

Now the electric vehicle technology is not mature, and the main problem now is to solve the problem of converting the kinetic energy of the electric vehicle into electrical energy, so that the electric vehicle can fully achieve its own charging cycle through the wind power when running, after all, the current charging pile can not be everywhere, and the electric vehicle mileage is low.

4 aspects to compare:

1. Economy:

Electric vehicles use electricity, while the fuel used by ordinary fuel vehicles fluctuates with international oil prices. Compared with the cost of fuel, electric vehicles are definitely more cost-effective than gasoline vehicles. Electric vehicles are basically not limited by lottery, and in some cities they will also save a sum of money.

The purchase tax exemption policy for electric vehicles has obvious advantages. Therefore, electric cars will go to fuel vehicles to save more money.

2. Power:

In terms of power, electric vehicles use electric motors, and fuel vehicles use engines. One uses electricity and the other burns oil. They vary in terms of power depending on the model.

Their respective powers also differ. However, one thing is for sure, the power of the electric motor comes faster than that of the combustion engine. Therefore, we can also see that the starting speed of electric vehicles is generally relatively fast, but the follow-up power of electric vehicles is not as good as that of fuel vehicles, one of them is like a sprint champion, and the other is a marathon champion.

3. Daily use:

In the process of daily use, new energy vehicles have the characteristics of good comfort and low noise. This is incomparable to fuel vehicles. However, this is said to be a substitute for transportation in our ordinary cities.

Once you run a long distance, you say that there are a few people who dare to use new energy vehicles. When people are running long distances, the most worrying thing is the battery life. If something goes wrong along the way, then you have to wait to call a tow truck.

In the process of running long distances, ordinary fuel vehicles do not have to worry about this aspect at all, because the fuel is not enough, we can add it in the service area. However, there is not enough electricity. Whether there is a charging pile in the service area is still a problem.

4. Service life:

In this regard, it can be said that fuel vehicles are completely victorious. An ordinary fuel vehicle has been running for more than ten years, and there is no problem for hundreds of thousands of kilometers. However, the battery of new energy vehicles will gradually decrease with the increase in the number of charging times.

If you change the battery of a new energy vehicle halfway, the cost is half of the whole vehicle. Therefore, in this regard, new energy vehicles are at a disadvantage.

High efficiency is the most significant feature of electric vehicles in terms of energy utilization. In cities, there are many vehicles on the road, and traffic lights are often encountered, and vehicles must constantly stop and start. For conventional combustion vehicles, this not only means that a lot of energy is consumed, but it also means more exhaust gases.

Car engine noise is the main noise during driving**, and electric vehicles have an absolute advantage in this regard compared to fuel vehicles. It is basically quiet in driving and accelerates without the roar of a gasoline engine, making it ideal for driving on urban roads where noise pollution needs to be reduced.

Pure electric vehicles are pure electric vehicles with alternative fuel vehicles sooner or later.

With the increase in the number of cars, China's environmental pollution is also getting heavier, which has a great impact on people's health. Therefore, the state has further improved the tail row and encouraged everyone to buy pure electric vehicles, introducing various subsidies and discounts.

New energy vehicles have fuel economy and environmental protection, which is also the future development direction of automobile enterprises, electric vehicles as a representative of new energy vehicles, also have unique advantages, due to the reduction of the engine, so in the body silence is significantly more than the fuel preparation of ordinary cars, it uses a motor as a driving device, but in daily driving, the speed is also very fast.

In addition, the only power source for electric vehicles is currently high-capacity lithium batteries. Compared with gasoline vehicles, the battery energy density is low, and the speed is slow, it is afraid of heat and cold, and poor durability is also its biggest disadvantage, so this is also the disadvantage of electric vehicles.

The pros and cons of new energy and fuel vehicles are as follows:

Advantages: Pure electric vehicles are used for charging, which eliminates polluting exhaust emissions at the root. Since there is no need to refuel, pure electric vehicles are more economical; The energy released by fuel is high, the endurance is strong, and it relies on the traditional engine and gearbox to output and transmit power, so the driving experience of fuel vehicles is better.

Disadvantages: The demand for charging piles for new energy vehicles is too large, and the poor endurance is the main disadvantage; When the fuel vehicle starts, there is often a sense of frustration, the speed is relatively slow, and at the same time, because the engine equipped on it will produce vibration, sometimes there will be noise, and the exhaust gas emitted is also harmful to health and pollutes the environment.

What is certain is that electric vehicles can completely replace fuel vehicles within 10 years. Why the development of dual-force drive technology has been successfully developed due to the breakthrough of the biggest technical bottleneck of electric vehicles, the bottleneck of battery and charging technology. The technical attributes are basic research and original innovative nonlinear mechanical theoretical systems, combined with invented products.

Electric vehicles with dual-force drive technology do not need to be recharged, as it is similar to solar energy, and all the required energy comes from existing natural energy sources.

In fact, in nature, the greatest amount of energy** is the structural interaction force between the object and the universe. Human civilization has not entered this field for thousands of years. The root cause is not the wrong conclusion of force and energy.

While nuclear physics has entered the application of the structural forces of radioactive elements, the use of methods to destroy the structural forces of uranium to obtain large amounts of energy is evidence, but unfortunately, there is no further progress. So, is the fission of the uranium element after the structural force is destroyed the root cause of force or energy? No one will investigate!

As a result, today's nuclear physics only studies the embarrassing situation of roaming particles.

Although a variety of charging facilities continue to expand, but there is still a considerable gap from seamless docking, most areas can not guarantee that electric vehicles can run unscrupulously, individual first-tier cities in the urban charging pile will have a certain guarantee but far from no dead end coverage, a period of time electric vehicles can only be used as a family short-distance scooter. It has nothing to do with the depletion of fossil fuels, just like the end of the Stone Age, it has nothing to do with whether there are stones or not. If you want to talk about the reason for the inevitability of history, good things will always replace old bad things, and technological progress will always lead to social progress.

New energy vehicles are likely to replace fuel vehicles in the future, which specifically refers to new energy vehicles, not pure electric vehicles. And at least in the energy supplement efficiency, as well as the mileage to achieve the experience of fuel vehicles, the people will be willing to pay for it, the country will raise oil prices, urban traffic restrictions, all bus taxis electricity, whether you like it or not, the cost of the car is high.

Never question this, because times are advancing, and now technology is getting faster and faster, isn't it?

If this electric car has this advantage, that is, in the process of its use, its use cost is relatively low. There is also his electric car, which has better acceleration and handling, stronger power, and this electric car can be hung with a green card, and this is not limited to driving. But his shortcomings are that the performance is not very stable, the failure rate is relatively high, and the maintenance cost is relatively expensive after the failure, and the long-distance running is more troublesome and needs to be charged.

If this fuel vehicle has this advantage, that is, it runs long distances, and there is no need to worry about charging, and its performance is relatively stable, and the failure rate is relatively low. That's what he said about this shortcoming. There is a city it will be limited.

Abstract] This electric car has this advantage, that is, in the process of its use, its use cost is relatively low. There is also his electric car, which has better acceleration and handling, stronger power, and this electric car can be hung with a green card, and this is not limited to driving. But his shortcomings are that the performance is not very stable, the failure rate is relatively high, and the maintenance cost is relatively expensive after the failure, and the long-distance running is more troublesome and needs to be charged.

If this fuel vehicle has this advantage, that is, it runs long distances, and there is no need to worry about charging, and its performance is relatively stable, and the failure rate is relatively low. That's what he said about this shortcoming. There is a city it will be limited.