My mother s crotch was broken and pulled, how can the forensic identification be a minor injury for

Tentatively minor injuries are not wrong.

Fractures are not used in the criteria for serious injuries.

Serious injuries resulting from limb injuries must be limb absence or dysfunction. In the forensic examination, the determination of functional impairment must wait for a statutory recovery period, which is generally 3 to 6 months. It's not been a month since November 23rd, hasn't it?

Please do not equate the "minor injury" in the mouth of the common people with the "minor injury" in the forensic evaluation, in the forensic evaluation, the "minor injury" is already relatively serious.

It is recommended that you find a knowledgeable forensic doctor (or doctor) and lawyer to help you solve the relevant professional problems.

Personally, I think the most important thing now is not to worry about the appraisal conclusions, the most important thing is your mother's health, try to find a better hospital**, don't be afraid to spend money, anyway, when the time comes, just find the other party. The normal medical expenses must be paid by the other party, and there is no need to save money for others!

If the other party doesn't come out, you just tell him that it's just a tentative minor injury now, maybe it's still a minor injury, if the effect is not good, it's a serious injury, you just wait for a few more years in prison!

Minor injuries are also criminal responsibility, and the public security procuratorate should intervene, and you can urge them to arrest **.

1. If the procuratorate initiates a criminal lawsuit, you can file a criminal case for civil compensation, claiming compensation for your mother's medical expenses, nutrition expenses, nursing expenses, lost work expenses, transportation expenses, disability allowances, etc.

2. If the procuratorate does not file a lawsuit, you can directly file a civil lawsuit with the court to demand that the defendant bear criminal and civil liability for compensation.

If the forensic doctor is biased towards them, you're going to make a big deal out of it. The bigger it gets, the more scared they become.

You have the money, why do you care about it?

1.The above minor injuries are criminal cases, and the public security organs have intervened, so whether the case can be successfully mediated or not, it will eventually go to the procuratorate and the court, but the other party actively compensates you, and the sentencing will be reduced.

2.If you have already mediated, you will not mediate again when you go to court. The procuratorate is the public prosecution organ of the state and does not care about mediation. If the public security organ has already established a criminal case, and the procuratorate finds that the facts are clear, it will definitely transfer it to the court for trialIn such incidents, there is generally no real sentence.

1. Aren't you in China? Hehe.

2. Since everyone has been criminally detained, then wait for the case to be transferred to the procuratorate and court? Why organize mediation.

3. According to what I said, under normal circumstances, mediation can be organized in cases of minor injuries, or the public security organs may be responsible for investigating and transferring the case to litigation at the request of the victim.

4. The case has certainly not yet reached the court, that's for sure. If you can't mediate, wait for the court's decision.

5. Regarding your question, I don't understand how to reconcile and detain people, this is conflicting.

6. The approval of arrest means that the case can ensure normal litigation, and the approval of arrest means prosecution.

If the forensic expert is slightly injured, according to Article 170 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China and the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court, this is within the scope of private prosecution cases, and if you do not file a lawsuit, the court will ignore it. If you settle, then you don't sue, then the court won't care.

Sexual wet lung, pneumothorax, what you said has constituted an injury, belongs to a criminal case, and is not within the scope of regulation. The other party needs to pay criminal responsibility, that is, to be sentenced. You can file a criminal and civil lawsuit with the court in accordance with the law, that is, you will be held criminally responsible, and you will also have him bear your hospital fees and business expenses.

The ribs are all broken, how can it be considered a minor injury? This is already a serious injury!

If there are facts and evidence of the crime, the public security organs shall file a case for investigation, and if the criminal suspect escapes, a wanted warrant may be issued in accordance with law. The police station said irresponsible, call the police. The police will take care of it.

If the public security bureau doesn't care, you can go to the procuratorate.

The procuratorate does not care, and can go to the court on its own to prosecute the other party for the crime of intentional injury.

The public security department shall determine whether the conditions for filing a case are met, and if so, the criminal responsibility of the beater shall be pursued in accordance with legal procedures.

1. Criminal liability. Article 234 of the Criminal Law: Whoever intentionally harms the body of another person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention or controlled release.

Whoever commits the crime in the preceding paragraph, causing serious injury, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years; Whoever causes death or seriously injures a person by especially cruel means, causing serious disability, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years, life imprisonment, or death. Where this Law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.

2. Procedures for reporting crimes. Article 166 of the "Provisions on the Procedures for the Handling of Criminal Cases by Public Security Organs" provides that public security organs shall immediately accept citizens' renunciation, reporting, accusations, or reports, or the voluntary surrender of criminal suspects, ask about the circumstances, and make a record, and after verifying that there are no errors, the person who turned them in, the person who reported the case, the accuser, the informant, or the person who voluntarily surrendered to the case shall sign and leave a fingerprint. When necessary, an audio or video recording shall be made.

Article 175:Where, after public security organs accept a case, upon review, find that there are facts of a crime that need to be pursued for criminal responsibility, and that they are within their jurisdiction, they are to file the case with the approval of the responsible person at a public security organ at the county level or above; Where it is found that there are no facts of a crime, or that the facts of the crime are obviously minor and do not need to be pursued for criminal responsibility, or that there are other circumstances in which criminal responsibility is not pursued in accordance with law, the case is not to be filed with the approval of the responsible person at a public security organ at the county level or above.

In cases where there is an accuser, and a decision is made not to file the case, the public security organs shall draft a notice not to file the case and serve it on the accuser within 3 days.

Article 187:Public security organs shall promptly conduct an investigation into criminal cases that have already been filed, and comprehensively and objectively collect and collect evidence of the criminal suspect's guilt or innocence, or the severity or seriousness of the crime.

, also a college student. Let me first express my opinion on the way you handle things, you have to reason with him so much, it is meaningful, you not only have to remember that you are a college student, but you are also a human being. No matter who is right or wrong, he is like that when you say everything, you are still chirping with him, and the three of you are afraid of one.

MaoLine. Let's fight first, real chicken.

. Everyone else has beaten you like that, and you don't know each other yet... Speechless.

You should stay in the hospital for now. Minor injury to the other party constitutes a criminal offence and is intentional injury. This crime is in principle an indictable case, but it can also be mediated.

However, the victim can also directly go to the court to file a private prosecution. I guess the police station is ready to mediate for you. Immediately it's not like thinking more than one thing is better than one less thing, big things into small things, small things into nothing, nothing is the best, .

Personally, I feel the tune. He. Mother.

Go and sue him, day. He. First.

Person. But your character, I guess.

You stay in the hospital now. Keep all your ** lists. Anyway, the hospital has it.

It's better to hire a lawyer for this case, aren't you a college student? The school has such an institution. Go for help.

Believe brother, if you don't mediate, the criminal case will be attached to the civil case, and you will make people and money. Exercise yourself by the way.

First of all, you called the police, which is the right choice.

Secondly, after you wait for the forensic examination, you can choose two ways to solve the problem. The first is to request the first case to be filed, if the case is not filed, then you can ask the local procuratorate to supervise the filing of the case. The second is to directly choose to initiate a civil lawsuit attached to the criminal case. Claim compensation for various losses.

The above comments are for reference only.

If the conditions for criminal responsibility have been met for minor injuries, you may hand over the injury appraisal to the public security organs for criminal responsibility in accordance with the law. You can also pursue their civil liability through the courts.

If you don't mediate with him, sue him

Minor injury refers to an injury in which various external factors such as physical, chemical, and biological factors act on the human body, causing a certain degree of damage to the structure of tissues and organs or partial dysfunction, and do not constitute serious injuries but are not minor injuries. Impairment of human limbs or appearance, partial impairment of hearing, vision or other organ functions, or other injuries that are moderately harmful to personal health, including minor injuries of the first degree and minor injuries of the second degree. The standards for forensic appraisal of minor injuries are formulated in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, on the basis of the theories and techniques of medicine and forensic science, and in combination with the practical experience of forensic medical examinations, to provide a basis for the appraisal of minor injuries.

The Standards for the Appraisal of Minor Human Injuries were promulgated by the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, and the Ministry of Justice of the People's Republic of China on July 1, 1990, with a total of six chapters and Article 56. The identification of the degree of injury should be based on the primary injury and its consequences directly caused by external factors to the human body, including the injury at the time of the injury, the complications and sequelae caused by the injury, etc., and a comprehensive analysis and comprehensive assessment.

If your husband's injury is a perforated eardrum, it meets the standard of minor injury, and the other party's behavior violates Article 234 of the Criminal Law, which is suspected of intentional injury and should bear criminal and civil liability in accordance with the law.

If mediation fails, you can request ** to file a lawsuit against the perpetrator, and then you can go to the court to apply for a civil lawsuit attached to the criminal case.

The first question: traumatic perforation of the tympanic membrane is already a minor injury, and if the nasal bone is fractured, a comminuted fracture is also a minor injury, except for a linear fracture of one side of the nasal bone. If there is a contusion of the eyeball, it is recommended to repeat the orbital CT to see if there is a fracture of the orbital wall, and if so, it is a minor injury.

The second question: If the public security organ has already filed a case, it is recommended that you take the color ** of the eardrum, the CT of the nasal bone, the orbit and the report sheet, as well as the power of attorney of the public security organ to the forensic appraisal agency for injury evaluation. The appraisal conclusion is that the minor injuries constitute a criminal case, and the public security organs can use your injury appraisal to deal with the relevant responsible persons, and there are two results:

If the mediation fails, the other party will be investigated for criminal responsibility, usually up to 3 years in prison, controlled release or criminal detention.

Hello, according to the situation you said. This one already constitutes a minor injury. It should be identified as a minor injury.

This kind of thing should be reported in the first place. Then let the person go to the forensic examination. If the injuries of the person concerned are found to be minor, then the attacker can be held criminally and civilly liable.

However, if the parties constitute minor injuries, the settlement of this kind of matter is generally a negotiated settlement, that is, private, and only the civil liability of the other party is investigated. The cost of this compensation can only be calculated according to the actual situation. The items of compensation mainly include the reasonable expenses involved in the parties' medical expenses, lost work expenses, hospital meal subsidies, transportation expenses, etc.

The first must be an examination in a people's hospital at or above the county level**, or an examination in a hospital designated by the public security**. Second, the doctor of the above hospital shall issue a diagnosis certificate of clavicle fracture and **. The third is that the forensic doctor will determine whether it is a minor injury according to the regulations.

If the forensic doctor finally determines that your injury is not a minor injury, you take out their forensic evaluation criteria for minor injuries and reason with him, and if he ignores it, you can also find a higher forensic authority for evaluation, and finally make a judgment according to the evaluation of the higher forensic authority. But you must not be arguing, you must follow the facts.

It is only a civil dispute, and this kind of civil dispute can be completely private, mainly to apologize to the other party, and then compensate him for taking the forensic appraisal to the police station, and the police station is only mediation. If he insists on suering, the court will too.

The forensic examination is valid for life, and there is no issue of statute of limitations.

Depending on the plaintiff's claim, he may claim compensation for medical expenses, lost work expenses, nursing expenses, nutrition expenses, disability compensation, and solatium for mental damages.

1. Personal injury compensation.

Articles 17 and 18 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases clearly stipulate the scope of personal injury compensation:

1) Where the victim suffers personal injury but does not result in disability or death, the compensation obligor shall compensate the victim for all expenses incurred for medical treatment** and the loss of income due to lost work, including medical expenses, lost work expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, accommodation expenses, hospital meal subsidies, and necessary nutrition expenses.

2) Where the victim is disabled due to injury, the compensation obligor shall compensate the victim for the necessary expenses incurred due to the increase in living needs and the loss of income due to the loss of the ability to work, including disability compensation, disability assistive devices, and living expenses for dependents, as well as necessary expenses, nursing expenses, and follow-up expenses actually incurred due to nursing care and continuation.

3) Where the victim or the deceased's close relatives suffer mental damages, and the person with the right to compensation requests compensation from the people's court for compensation for moral damages, the "Supreme People's Court Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Determination of Compensation for Moral Damages in Civil Torts" is to be applied.

2. Judicial appraisal constitutes minor injuries and must also bear criminal responsibility.

Article 234 of the Criminal Law: Whoever intentionally harms the body of another person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention or controlled release.

In the case of injury, when it is reported to the public security organs, it should be examined according to the facts of the case, and for the version that should be investigated for criminal responsibility, it should be established as a criminal case and compulsory measures should be taken against the criminal suspect.

As you said, your injuries constitute minor injuries, and if the evidence of his injuries to you is conclusive and can prove that a case of injury has occurred, then the police should promptly file a case and take coercive measures against the suspect (which can be criminal detention).

In addition, you mentioned the question of whether the police station detains the suspect during the re-evaluation of the injury. I don't think this question makes sense objectively. Because after reporting the case, the public security organ in the case has already reached the conclusion of minor injuries through the entrusted evaluation of the injuries, which shows that the criminal responsibility of the criminal suspect should be investigated, and corresponding criminal coercive measures (release on bail pending trial, residential surveillance, criminal detention) should be taken against the criminal suspect.

Even if the criminal suspect disagrees with the appraisal conclusion and submits an application for re-evaluation, it should not affect the normal handling of the case, that is, he should still be under the compulsory measures taken before. If the re-appraisal concludes that it does not constitute a minor injury, then the case will be transferred to the administrative case handling procedure, the mediation will be adjusted, and the administrative penalty will be imposed with an administrative fine or detention.