Whether scientific research is practice or understanding

1. According to the research objectives, it is divided into exploratory research, explanatory research and descriptive research.

Exploratory research is a type of research in which a preliminary understanding of the object or problem is studied, in order to obtain a preliminary impression and perceptual understanding, and to provide a foundation and direction for more thorough and in-depth research in the future.

Descriptive research, also known as narrative research, refers to the research whose results are to correctly describe the characteristics or overall picture of some population or a certain phenomenon, and the task is to collect data, discover situations, provide information, and describe the main laws and characteristics from the chaotic phenomena.

Explanatory research, explanatory research is also known as causal research. This type of research mainly explores the causal relationship between a certain hypothesis and a conditional factor, that is, on the basis of recognizing what the phenomenon is and what its condition is, further clarifying or understanding why things and phenomena are the way they are.

2. According to the content of the research, it is classified into basic research and applied research.

Scientific research is practice.

1. For example, people didn't dare to eat crabs at first, but the first person practiced "eating crabs", and people "recognized" that crabs could be eaten. So practice is cognitive.

2. Columbus.

He was once a poor boy by the sea, he loved the sea and longed to sail.

His dream of sailing inspired him to study geography and he went to Portugal in every possible way.

England and France, but both were rejected, and later, with the support of the King of Spain, he led his fleet four times into the Atlantic.

Approaching the discovery of the American continent after a lot of hard work.

3. Sima Qian.

Writes about the state of Wei. In history, I heard that in order to destroy the Wei State, Qin once diverted the Yellow River to flood the capital of Wei.

In order to find out the epic, he went to a large number of people, came to the city wall, climbed high and low, looked for traces of the year, and asked local old people to investigate patiently, and finally mastered a large amount of information to confirm the Qin State of that year.

It is true that there was a lot of flooding, and this historical fact was recorded in the "Historical Records".

The driving force of development

Without practice, there can be no knowledge, and understanding practice cannot be understood correctly. Awareness arises from the need for practice, and the purpose of practice is to change the world to meet human needs. To change the world, we must know the world.

The need for practice and its development is the source of knowledge, the generation of knowledge and the driving force of development. In modern times, the development of practice has led to the emergence of scientific achievements and the birth of new sciences.

The endless development of human practice determines the endless development of understanding. At the same time, practice is the purpose of knowing. Recognition must meet the needs of practice and serve practice. Practice offers the possibility of understanding.

Only practice can provide the information necessary for understanding. At the same time, it is only through practice that people can acquire and continuously develop the ability to process information, that is, the ability to sharpen their thinking. Practice is the only criterion for testing the truth of knowledge.

Whatever is in line with objective truthful understanding will inevitably be successfully transformed into objective reality through practice. On the contrary, any erroneous understanding is bound to fail in practice. With social practice.

As the criterion for testing truth, practice is also developing and perfecting historically.

It is hoped that by comparing the differences between the two, it is revealed that the practice of science is not intended to replace science**, but a way of teaching the teaching content of the emerging field of engineering. The two are not antagonistic in themselves, or they may even form a complementary relationship in the process of students' scientific learning, so that students' scientific literacy will be more perfect. In the process of discussing the difference between the two, the content of the two, the way of solving the problem, the situation of the problem created in the classroom and the background of the creation of the two are compared.

There are three key differences from hands-on teaching.

First, in terms of concept, ** can be regarded as an independent activity, while practice can only exist in a relationship of interdependence and interaction;

Second, practice places more emphasis on the epistemological aspect of science, and the exploration of this level can only be carried out in combination with specific subject knowledge.

Practice is cognizant and right.

First of all, practice puts forward the need for the generation of knowledge. People's cognitive activities are produced to meet the needs of practice and to solve and accomplish the problems and tasks raised by practice. The tasks of scientific research and the topics of scientific work are put forward by the needs of practice and revolve around the needs of human practice.

Secondly, practice also provides the possibility for the formation of understanding and turns this possibility into reality. Practice directly and realistically connects the subject and the object, so that the subject can obtain real and reliable information from the object. Only through the intermediary of practice can objective things be transformed into the subject's cognitive object and content.

Test the truth. Dialectical materialism holds that practice is the only criterion for testing truth, which is determined by the nature of truth and the characteristics of practice.

Truth is subjective and objective understanding. In order to determine whether subjectivity conforms to objectivity, it is necessary to compare subjectivity and objectivity, that is, as a criterion of truth, it must have the characteristic of linking subjectivity and objectivity. It is impossible to find the criterion of truth within the scope of human subjective understanding, and we cannot test subjectivity with subjectivity and test cognition with cognition, because subjectivity cannot practice subjectivity.

Nor can objective things themselves be the criterion for testing truth, nor can objective things compare subjective knowledge with themselves. Practice is what the spirit sees in matter and the subjective sees in objectivity.

In addition to the advantages of universality, practice also has the advantages of direct reality. The so-called "direct reality" refers to the fact that practice can turn correct understanding into direct reality. In this way, practice becomes a bridge between the subjective and the objective.

Practice is knowing. Practice is the only criterion for testing truth. Only practice can make people realize the true appearance of things, so understanding is the origin of understanding things.

Practice is the driving force of understanding, and only practice can improve the level of understanding things, and people's cognitive ability grows with the growth of practical experience.

Position in practicePractice is the essence and foundation of social relations. Analyzing the essence of social relations into social practice is a distinctive feature of Marx's thought on social relations, and it is also the requirement of Marx's practical philosophy.

Marx believed that man is not only the subject engaged in social material production and human production itself, but also the subject of social relations, "Man is the essence and basis of all human activities and all human relations." In reality, the essence of man is the practice of free and conscious labor; Therefore, we can say that practice is the essence and foundation of all human social relations.

Practice is the foundation of understanding: Fundamentally speaking, practice is the foundation of understanding. All understanding, fundamentally speaking, is acquired by man in the practice of transforming the world, so practice is the foundation of understanding.

For individuals or people of a certain era, knowledge can be obtained through the study of indirect experience, that is, through the study of the experience of predecessors, but the experience of predecessors still comes from practice. Therefore, the root of knowledge is practice.

Practical activities

Practice creates a humanized natural and man-made world. Anthropomorphic nature is the opposite of "free nature". It refers to the object world that is related to the practical activities of human beings, created by the essential power of human beings, and occupied by the people of society.

It is an idea expressed by Marx in the 1844 Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts through the discussion of "object activity", which is the opposite of alienated nature. Marx believed that labor is the essence of human beings, which includes the relationship between man and nature.

Man regards the natural world as the object of labor, and the fundamental content of labor is objectification, that is, the laborer condenses and embodies his own essential strength in the natural object as the product of labor, so that the natural world is marked with the imprint of human activities, and the effective ability of human beings becomes the attribute of natural objects. The objectification of labor necessarily presupposes the natural world. Because without nature, without the sensual external world, the worker cannot create anything.

First, practice is cognitive. Second, practice is the driving force for the development of understanding. Third, practice is the only criterion for testing whether an understanding is correct or not. Fourth, practice is the ultimate goal of understanding.

There is a gap between thinking and doing, there are practical conditions to do things, only after doing it can you know what is wrong, so as to make improvements, accumulate experience, and have understanding.

First of all, the need for practice determines the generation of understanding, that is, people's need to transform the world gives rise to the need to understand the world. Second, practice produces true knowledge, and all human understanding, whether direct or indirect, comes from practice in the final analysis.

First, the understanding of the best in practice.

The ultimate in knowledge is practice. There are two kinds of knowledge, one is practice, and the other is inheritance, the former is such as measuring the boiling point of water, and the latter is such as students learning knowledge from books. But the understanding of inheritance also comes from the practice of others.

Practice and inheritance are the relationship between source and flow. The ultimate in knowledge is practice.

2. Practice is the only criterion for testing understanding.

Whether the understanding is correct or not can only be known in practice. Whether the boiling point of water is one or the other can only have a say after measuring it yourself. As the saying goes, facts speak louder than words, and that's it.

3. Cognition is used in practice.

The relationship between understanding and practice can avoid blind action and empiricism and dogmatism. In the dialectical relationship between practice and cognition, Marxist philosophy first emphasizes that practice is the foundation of cognition and that practice plays a decisive role in cognition. Practice is the first thing to know, practice is the driving force for the development of knowledge, practice is the criterion for testing understanding and whether it has truth, and practice is the purpose of understanding.