The Buddha said that everything is empty, but only one is not empty, what is not empty?

Cause and effect are not empty. In Buddhism.

, pervasively resembling something similar to "nihilism."

For example, the so-called emptiness of all dharmas, the absence of self in all dharmas, only the nirvana of the Buddha.

realm to see the truth of the facts. But in Buddhism, there is an attribute that, in terms of Buddhist teachings, is that it is not nothingness, but a kind of tangible being that we can feel and associate with. What is this property?

It is what the Buddha called "cause and effect." The so-called "good and evil will be rewarded in the end, and the way of heaven is good reincarnation." ”

Cause and effect are different from concrete things. In the teachings of Buddhism, he does think that all appearances, that is, the phenomena of things that we see, the so-called phenomena of things that actually exist, and the properties of things themselves, are nothing. Because from a Buddhist point of view, that is to say:

Everything has no self-nature. These things themselves do not have a will of their own, they are all determined by various beings, that is, beings, whose development is determined by the combination of causes and conditions. But cause and effect are not the sameCause and effect is a chain relationship and a chain reaction, such as the so-called "what if" that we like to hearMound machineDidn't pass by Niujia Village".

That's why Buddhism advocates letting vengeful people put down their butcher knives, because "when is the time for retribution".Cause and effect do not have a moment to stop, as long as you do it, it will definitely happen.

The Buddha could not interfere with cause and effect. The Buddha is the highest realm in Buddhism, that is, the "Buddha Fruit Position", the enlightened person of the Buddha realm, who has boundless and infinite supernatural powers, saying that they are in the three realms and six realms.

Anything is possible, and it's not much worse. But there is also such a saying in Buddhism, which basically means:The Buddha's supernatural powers are not as good as the Buddha's wishes, but the Buddha's wishes cannot shake cause and effect.

That is, the influence of cause and effect is like a big net that actually exists, and once you are bound, even the omnipotent Buddha can't help you, the horror of cause and effect can be seen.

To sum up, the Buddha said that everything is empty, but cause and effect are not empty, and as long as cause and effect are created, they will not stop, and even the Buddha cannot solve them.

It is said that cause and effect are not empty, what you plant is what you reap and what you are doing, what you are doing now is what you have chosen yourself, so we have to be a kind person.

The Buddha said that everything is empty, but the Buddha also said that cause and effect are not empty. Sowing good gets good, sowing evil gets evil, good and evil will be rewarded in the end, and everyone's karma cannot escape.

All laws are empty, but cause and effect are not empty. "Source: Buddhist Sutras. The literal meaning is roughly as follows: all dharmas are empty, and all dharmas are empty.

Connotation: Because all things are produced by the combination of causes and conditions, there is no single, fixed, and constant existence in the forest. Therefore, in the end, it is not available.

Everything we are talking about here is the Ten Thousand Laws. It includes the visible objects, the invisible minds, and even the Dharma itself.

So it's all things. All follow this law (everything comes into being due to the combination of causes and conditions). It is precisely because of this law that all laws arise and perish. In fact, the cause and effect of dependent origin and extinction are cause and effect. Because of the cause, so the effect.

All laws are empty, but cause and effect are not empty. The literal meaning is roughly as follows: all dharmas are empty, that is, all dharmas are empty. But only cause and effect are not empty. This sentence is convenient to say. There is an intrinsic meaning to it.

"All laws are empty" means that all "illusory" and "wonderful" things are "unreal" and "illusory". In other words, these two sentences are actually one sentence. All laws are empty, that is, all laws are dependent on their origins and extinctions. Cause and effect are not empty, and they are also the origin and extinction of all laws.