China: How big is it if you count the territories that have not been lost and have not been returned

During the Qing Dynasty, China's land area was 13 million square kilometers.

1. Treaty of Shimonoseki.

2. Outer Mongolia-Soviet-Japanese Non-Aggression Pact.

3. Vladivostok and Sakhalin-Beijing Treaty.

4. McMahon Line - Southern Tibet.

5. Ryukyu Islands - Beijing Treaty.

6. Tangnu Ulianghai - Uriya Sutai Boundary Covenant.

7. The Treaty of Jiangdong 64 Tun and Aihui.

8. Nansha Islands.

9. Black Blind Island.

10. Taiwan. Chinese need to keep in mind and welcome additions!!

On core issues such as safeguarding sovereignty and territorial integrity, China has always maintained its policy propositions.

Taking the South China Sea incident as an example, China has proposed to 'shelve disputes and jointly develop', but this premise is that 'sovereignty belongs to us', which is still very different from the claimants in the South China Sea. But these differences can be negotiated, tested by time, and finally resolved.

The Xiangshan Forum, which aims to establish a transparent, open, open and equal mechanism for the Asia-Pacific region, can provide a good reference for resolving disputes and differences between countries. All large and small countries in the forum are equal, which provides a platform for all parties to put forward their own security propositions in order to safeguard security in the Asia-Pacific region.

First of all, it is not the core territory that is lost, I don't believe it, you see how Britain bragged on the Hong Kong issue, and was borne by China.

The second is that China is trying to admit that it is suffocating its head and holding back its big moves, you see that Russia is praised every day, saying that the Russian Emperor is fierce, NB, invincible, the more fierce Russia fights, the happier China is, there is Russia to pull hatred, the firepower of the United States and Europe has gone to Russia, and Russia will repeat the story of China and the United States joining forces to resist Russia. Therefore, a big fight for a non-core territory will only bring the country behind these small countries to take action. China is not strong enough to confront countries behind the scenes, not to mention that China can't, not to mention that no country in the world can do it.

This is not appropriate to discuss here, and it involves core interests.

Hello dear, as follows:

More than 1858<>600 square kilometers.

More than 18<>604 million square kilometers.

In the 80s of the 19th century<> 70,000 square kilometers.

A total of 1.53 million square kilometers were ceded to Tsarist Russia.

The territories that have not been recovered to date include:1Diaoyu Island 2

Outer Mongolia 3Vladivostok 4Sakhalin 5

McMahon Line area 6Ryukyu 7Tangnu Ulianghai 8

Jiangdong 64 Tun 9Burleigh and the Black Blind Island 10Spratly Islands.

Historically, China's lost territories.

Dear, I'm sending it to you, wait a minute, thank you.

Hello dear, as follows:

More than 1858<>600 square kilometers.

More than 18<>604 million square kilometers.

In the 80s of the 19th century<> 70,000 square kilometers.

A total of 1.53 million square kilometers were ceded to Tsarist Russia.

The territories that have not been recovered to date include:1Diaoyu Island 2

Outer Mongolia 3Vladivostok 4Sakhalin 5

McMahon Line area 6Ryukyu 7Tangnu Ulianghai 8

Jiangdong 64 Tun 9Burleigh and the Black Blind Island 10Spratly Islands.

As long as China restores its position in the world during the Han and Tang dynasties, it is not impossible to restore the territorial scope of the Yuan Dynasty.

When it comes to the question of territorial loss, it is first necessary to understand which period it is compared with. Because the boundaries of a country are changing, the conclusions are often different when compared with different historical periods. If China's current territory is compared with that of the late Ming Dynasty, China has not only not lost its territory, but has opened up nearly 5 million square kilometers of territory.

The concept of "modern times" is also a vague point in time. If you count it from Genghis Khan's time, we really lost too much territory. But I never regarded the Yuan Dynasty as my own, it was a foreign invasion.

You should look at the history of the United States, compared to Mexico, we really don't lose much. Before 1846, the territory of Mexico was 4.34 million km2, and now the territory of Mexico is 1.97 million km2, with a territorial loss rate of 116%.

At the height of the Russian Empire, the territory of the Russian Empire reached 24.3 million square kilometers, and now Russia has an area of 10,000 km2. The rate of territorial loss is 42 per cent.

At its peak, the Ottoman Empire had 5.5 million square kilometers, and now Turkey has only a small part of the peninsula of Asia Minor and the Black Sea straits of Europe, with an area of 780,000 square kilometers. The rate of territorial loss is 605 per cent.

Do you need to go on with examples? It's really meaningless, there will always be someone in this world who is worse than you, the key depends on how you look at it. It also gives a lot of people the opportunity to comfort themselves so that they can continue to get drunk and dream of death.

It should be the Ottoman Empire, now there is only Turkey left, the others are not independent, they are annexed, and then it should be China, and the confiscated ones include Eastern Siberia, Sakhalin, Taiwan, Outer Mongolia, and some smaller areas.

Mexico is occupied by the United States for a large area.

It is not clear whether India and Pakistan are countries in modern times.

No, all the troops on the Indian side of Africa have been wiped out.