What is the role of the argumentation method, and the role of the commonly used argumentation method

1. Argument by example: Argument through typical examples, so as to make the argument more concrete and convincing. 2. Reasoning argumentation:

Prove the argument by reasoning, so that the argument is more generalized and deeper. 3. Figurative argument: prove through metaphor to make the argument vivid and easy to understand.

4. Comparative argumentation: The role of comparative argument is to highlight it.

Exemplary argumentation: cite conclusive, sufficient, and representative examples to prove the argument;

Reasoning argument: use the incisive insights in the classic works of Marxism-Leninism, the famous sayings and aphorisms of ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities, and the commonly recognized theorems and formulas to prove the arguments;

Comparative argumentation: Compare the positive and negative arguments or arguments and prove the argument in the comparison.

Figurative argument: Use well-known things as metaphors to prove an argument. In addition, in the rebuttal arguments, the method of refutation of "the spear of Eli, the shield of the attack" and the "method of reduction of fallacy" are often adopted. It is often used in combination in the majority meeting.

Inductive argumentation is also called "factual argument". It is a method of demonstrating a general conclusion by giving specific examples.

Deductive argumentation, also known as "theoretical argumentation", is the method of demonstrating individual cases in terms of general principles or conclusions. That is, to justify the argument of particularity with the argument of universality.

Analogical argument is the method of deriving examples of similar things from what is known, that is, the method of argumentation from the special to the particular.

Causal argumentation, which proves an argument by analyzing facts and revealing the causal relationship between the argument and the argument. Causal arguments can be based on causality, or causal evidence, or causal evidence, or mutual causality.

Quotation argumentation: a kind of "truth argument", citing famous sayings as arguments, citing classics to analyze problems and explain the reasoning. There are two ways to refer:

One is an explicit quotation, which explains who said the quoted words or their sources, and the other is an implicit quotation, that is, they do not explain who said or the source of the quoted words.

Argumentation methods include factual argumentation, truth argumentation, comparative argument, metaphorical argument, causal argument, citation argument, and theoretical argument.

3. Arguments of positive and negative: right and wrong are clear, right and wrong are clear, and they are impressive, making the argument more powerful or attractive.

4. Figurative argumentation: the truth is easy to understand, the language is vivid and vivid, and it is easy to be accepted.

5. Cite arguments: Quote famous sayings or quote some ordinary people's statements to make them more authoritative and popular, and make the argument powerful.

6. Causal argument: let people figure out the cause and effect of things, and the ins and outs.

7. Theoretical argumentation: The purpose is to prove that the argument is universal and regular.

The slag refers to the number of sales representatives of the study of potato beams.

Argumentation method: Make your own point of view have a way to substantiate.