What are the methods of argumentation and what are the functions of each

Argumentation methods include factual argumentation, truth argumentation, comparative argument, metaphorical argument, causal argument, citation argument, and theoretical argument.

3. Arguments of positive and negative: right and wrong are clear, right and wrong are clear, and they are impressive, making the argument more powerful or attractive.

4. Figurative argumentation: the truth is easy to understand, the language is vivid and vivid, and it is easy to be accepted.

5. Cite arguments: Quote famous sayings or quote some ordinary people's statements to make them more authoritative and popular, and make the argument powerful.

6. Causal argument: let people figure out the cause and effect of things, and the ins and outs.

7. Theoretical argumentation: The purpose is to prove that the argument is universal and regular.

There are methods of argumentation.

Exemplary argumentation: cite conclusive, sufficient, and representative examples to prove the argument;

Reasoning argument: use the incisive insights in the classic works of Marxism-Leninism, the famous sayings and aphorisms of ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities, and the commonly recognized theorems and formulas to prove the arguments;

Comparative argumentation: Compare the positive and negative arguments or arguments, and prove the argument in the comparison;

Figurative argument: Use well-known things as metaphors to prove an argument. In addition, in the rebuttal arguments, the method of refutation of "the spear of Eli and the shield of the attack" and the method of "reducing the fallacy" are often adoptedIt is often used in combination in the majority meeting.

Inductive argumentation is also called "factual argument".It is a method of demonstrating a general conclusion by giving specific examples.

Deductive argumentation, also known as "theoretical argumentation", is the method of demonstrating individual cases in terms of general principles or conclusions. That is, to justify the argument of particularity with the argument of universality.

Analogical argument is the method of deriving examples of similar things from what is known, that is, the method of argumentation from the special to the particular.

Causal argumentation, which proves an argument by analyzing facts and revealing the causal relationship between the argument and the argument. Causal arguments can be based on causality, or causal evidence, or causal evidence, or mutual causality.

Quotation argumentation: a kind of "truth argument", citing famous sayings as arguments, citing classics to analyze problems and explain the reasoning. There are two ways to refer:

One is an explicit quotation, which explains who said the quoted words or their sources, and the other is an implicit quotation, that is, they do not explain who said or the source of the quoted words.

It reads as follows:

1. Argument by example: Demonstrate by giving specific examples, so as to make the argument more concrete and convincing.

Answer format: The argumentation method of example argument is used, and the ...... is given(summary example) proves ......(If there is a sub-argument, write the sub-argument it proves, otherwise the central argument) so that the argument is more concrete and persuasive.

2. Reasoning argumentation: prove the argument by reasoning, so that the argument is more generalized and deeper.

Format of answer: The argumentation method of the rational argument is used to demonstrate the ......so that the argument is more generalized and deeper.

Note: If you cite famous quotes, aphorisms, and authoritative data, it can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument; Cites celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to read it.

Answer format: The argumentation method of citing arguments is used, by citing ......Proof ......points of view to make the argument more convincing. (Or more interesting to entice the reader to read on.) ）

3. Comparative argumentation. The role is to highlight.

Format of Answer: The argumentation method of contrastive argumentation is used, which will be ......and ......The comparison highlights the ......point of view.

4. Figurative argumentation: The truth can be explained in an easy-to-understand and easily accepted manner. Make the content of the argument more vivid and vivid, and more conducive to the reader's understanding.

Answer format: The argumentation method of figurative argument is used, which will be ......Likened to ......, proving ......so as to expound the abstract and esoteric truth vividly and vividly, and it is easy to understand.

Argumentation method: Make your own point of view have a way to substantiate.

What are the different methods of argumentation?

Common argumentation methods include factual argumentation, truth argumentation, comparative argumentation, metaphorical argumentation, etc., and the common argumentation methods and functions are shared for reference.

1.Factual argumentation

Introduction: Factual argument, also known as example argument, is a method of argumentation from material to point of view, from individual to general, and is a form of reasoning that summarizes a common conclusion from the analysis and study of many individual things. In this way, it is generally a matter of first dividing the argument and then concluding it, that is, putting forward the thesis straight to the point, then using materials to prove the argument layer by layer around the topic, and finally summarizing the conclusion.

2.Justification

Introduction: Using the method of reasoning, using the incisive insights in classic works, famous quotes from ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities, and recognized scientific principles, theorems, formulas, etc. to prove the viewpoint. The logical form of theoretical argument is deductive reasoning, that is, the inductive arguments are measured by scientific principles known to mankind.

Function: If you quote famous quotes, aphorisms, and authoritative data, it can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument; Cites celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to read it.

3.Contrasting arguments

Introduction: Comparative argument is the abbreviation of positive and negative argument, also known as comparative method, which is an argumentation method that compares and compares two things, deduces the differences between them, and makes the conclusion reflect the conclusion. This is a commonly used, persuasive method of argumentation.

The characteristics and essence of things are most easily revealed in contrast, especially the comparison of positive and negative things, which has great distinctness and can leave a deep impression.

Function: Compare two contradictory or opposing things, and reason from both positive and negative aspects, so as to reveal the essence of things, and make the expounded facts more profound and convincing.

4.Figurative argument

Introduction: Figurative argument refers to the argumentation method of using the reason of the parabler to demonstrate the reason of the analogue. Between two things, there is only a need for similarities to be used as a metaphor for one thing for another, thus demonstrating a more abstract matter.

The analogy between the parabler and the analogized is the same. Only when there are differences in class can we make a parable; Only when the reason is the same can we reason and argue.

Function: Through metaphorical argumentation, the truth discussed is simple and thorough, easy to understand, and has stronger persuasive power.

(1) Argument with examples: more convincing. Strong arguments.

2) Reasoning argumentation: more authoritative, more convincing, and powerful argumentation.

3) Metaphorical argumentation: use facts to make the argument easy to understand, vivid and easy to accept.

1.Factual argumentation: Use true, reliable, and representative examples to prove an argument. Function: Concretely and forcefully prove the central thesis, enhance the persuasiveness, interest, and authority of the article, and make the article easy to understand.

2.Comparative argumentation: Compare the positive and negative arguments or arguments, and prove the argument in the comparison; Function: Highlights the argument and makes people impressed.

4.Cite Arguments: Cite famous quotes, aphorisms, authoritative data, celebrity anecdotes, jokes, and anecdotes to argue. Function: Quoting celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers.

1.how the argument is presented;

2.how the argument is proven (what truths and facts are used, whether there are pros and cons of the analysis);

3.Relate to the structure of the full text, whether there is a summary.

Discussion, also known as reasoning, is a style of analyzing things, discussing facts, expressing opinions, and putting forward propositions. The author ascertains whether his views are correct or wrong and establishes or denies certain propositions by presenting facts, reasoning, and distinguishing between right and wrong. The proposal should have clear views, sufficient arguments, concise language, reasonable arguments, and strict logic.