How do you evaluate and explain a point?

Each of us can evaluate and elaborate on a point of view, and now many debate activities are more popular, many people like to watch strange sayings, for the evaluation of a point of view, we should analyze it objectively and rationally.

First, a clear definition of keywords. This definition must be clearly explained, and there cannot be more than two interpretations. If the original definition is misunderstood, your point of view is likely to be misunderstood, resulting in ineffective communication.

For example, when someone says something like "most people are irrational."

This sentence is a very vague argument, first of all, we need to see if the definition is clear. What exactly does "majority" mean? If it's more than 50 percent, it's the majority.

So does 51% count? : Some accommodations are changed to 60% or more to be called a majority. At this point, there will be no ambiguity in the understanding of the majority.

When looking at this sentence, there is a core word that is "rational". But what is rationality? Everyone's understanding here is different.

At this time, we need another skill, to search for the ** and academic definition of the word. Remember that it is an academic definition, not your own definition, of course, you can also define the vocabulary yourself, but it is up to you whether others agree with it and are authoritative. Then we need to look for this traditional definition of "rationality".

Second, the query of the definition, and the repetition, to examine the reliability of the information. Annotation definition and some kind of interpretation.

Third, quantify all verbal definitions and indicators. Try not to have loopholes as much as possible.

The analysis and evaluation must be closely integrated with the reality of the literary work, and avoid leaving the work to conduct rambling analysis, or infinitely exaggerating some of one's own speculations and materials without evidence.

Objective evaluation.

Objective and fair evaluation should be given to the ideological content of the work and the writer's viewpoint and attitude, that is, the correct ideology should be taken as the theoretical basis, the dialectical method should be the basic analysis method, and the work should be analyzed and evaluated in combination with the unique artistic laws of the creation of literary works, rather than arbitrarily commenting on personal likes and dislikes. In the specific evaluation, the background of the social era, the writer's life thoughts, and the actual creation of the work are all important factors that must be considered.

How to make a proper self-evaluation.

Everyone inevitably has to sell themselves and play a certain role in society, and the key to the success of sales lies in whether we can correctly understand and evaluate ourselves, and how to conduct correct self-evaluation.

So, how do we conduct self-evaluation? "Taking people as the mirror in front of the mirror" is the main content of people's self-evaluation.

However, there is no such thing as an absolute flat "mirror", and anyone's evaluation of us is inevitably affected by their own personality, life experience, level of understanding, and intimacy with us

(1) The state can promote social equity, improve people's lives, promote the rational allocation of resources, and promote the smooth operation of the national economy through finance. Therefore, the state finance plays an important role, and we should vigorously increase fiscal revenue. (2) However, this does not mean that "the more revenue, the better".

This is because, under the condition that the total national income is fixed, there is a certain limit to fiscal revenue. Excessive fiscal revenue will affect the income of enterprises and individuals, and will affect the expansion of reproduction and the improvement of people's living standards. Too little fiscal revenue will affect the country's macroeconomic construction, affect the state's ability to carry out macroeconomic regulation and control of the economy, and then affect the development of the national economy and the improvement of the people's overall living standards. Therefore, the growth of state fiscal revenue should be consistent with the development of enterprise production and the improvement of the people's living standards.

The state should formulate a rational distribution policy to ensure the steady growth of the state's fiscal revenue, and at the same time promote the sustainable development of enterprises and the continuous improvement of the people's living standards. (3) To sum up, the point in the question is one-sided.