Can anyone help me distinguish between subordinate farming, serfdom, and so on

Updated on history 2024-07-15
12 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    The differences between the two are:

    1. The social system is different: slaves are in a slave society, and serfs belong to a feudal society.

    Later, after the establishment of a system in which members of the tribe could serve as slaves, sometimes some members of the tribe were used as slaves, but often as a punishment, such as debtors who were unable to pay their debts and sentenced to prison.

    3. The basic characteristic of serfs is that they are bound to the land and have to be attached to the serf owners. The serf owners, on the other hand, took advantage of this personal dependency to carry out supra-economic forced exploitation of the serfs. The form of rent in serfdom was mainly the rent of labour, supplemented by a small amount of rent in kind and money.

    4. In addition, slaves cultivating land for slave owners, etc., are equivalent to cattle and horses, and the land is not their own at all. Serfs, on the other hand, rented land from the landlord to cultivate and then paid rent, and there was no or only a small part of personal freedom.

    The origin of the subordinate farming system:

    1. The subordinate agricultural system originated in the ancient Roman republican period, the subordinate agricultural system has a certain degree of personal freedom and has its own independent economy, but it is essentially dependent on the master, and the origin of the subordinate agricultural system is mainly in the late Roman Republic, when one was a large-scale uprising of slaves, such as the Spartacus uprising.

    2. In addition, the number of Roman slaves overseas was limited due to the cessation of the expansion war, and in this case, the slave owners were forced to change their slave methods, and the slave owners divided many estates into small estates for slaves, which was the subordinate peasants.

    3. The origin of the subordinate peasants was originally some free people in the Roman Republican period, but after the slave owners were forced to give up the slave mode of production, they distributed small pieces of land to slaves, and the slaves who obtained small pieces of land gradually lost their personal freedom and depended on the slave owners.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Slaves have no land, no personal freedom, no personal dependence on the slave owner, no independent family and marriage, no independent property and independent economy.

    Serfs have no land, they have been enslaved to the lord's land for generations, they have no personal freedom, they are physically dependent on the lord, but they have independent family, marriage, economic and property rights, and the serfs pay rent to the landlord, which is mainly the rent of labor, and the lord can buy, sell, and mortgage the serfs, but they cannot kill them at will.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Serfs and slaves are the same, just in different terms.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Compared with slaves, serfs basically have no personal freedom, there is a pitiful amount of private property allowed by the serf owner to legally own and dominate the serfs, Kaifu can legally own a family, and their marriage is legally allowed, the personal dependence of the serf is inferior to the slave, and the serf Xinsun lead is basically a form of slave bound to work and serve on the share of agricultural land, and the personal dependence is stronger but inferior to the slave;In the good history of China, it is divided into personal serfs and Yongye serfs, and Yongye serfs are closer to subordinate farmersSerfs in Western Europe - Serfs had four basic characteristics that distinguished them from independent peasants:

    occupy the land but do not have ownership; to bear the burden of conscription and pay tribute; Dependent on the master, the person is not free; Have the means of subsistence, have your own economy;

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The agricultural and pastoral system is more like our ancient servant peasants, and the characteristic of the serf system is that the serf is bound to the land and has to be attached to the serf owner. Slaves, on the other hand, have no freedom or rights, and are "goods" that belong to their masters

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    The difference between serfs and slaves is that there is no such thing as a slave and a burying faction. And serfs, although their fate was the same as that of slaves, they had a kind of exploitation of exorbitant taxes. Chiga.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    There is no difference between the two, and there is no difference between slaves and animals, just a bunch of people who are at the mercy of others.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The difference between serfs and slaves is that they are referred to differently, cited and used differently, and emphatic are different.

    First, the reference is different.

    1. Serfs: also refers to peasants who are exploited and oppressed.

    2. First slave: a person who works for the slave owner and has no personal freedom.

    Second, the citation usage is different.

    1. Serfs: "To Shaoshan."

    The red flag roller did not pick up the serf halberd, **.

    Hang the Overlord Whip high. ”

    2. Slave: Ba Jin.

    Perdition, Chapter 10: "But my mother died because she had no love in the world, and my cousin was forced to be a slave. ”

    Third, the focus is different.

    1. Serf: a person who is forced to do farm work.

    2. Slaves: people who are forced to do low-level labor.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Serfs, because the land depends on the serf owners, help the serf owners farm the land free of charge, and obtain a little bit of labor products by themselves, and have personal freedom and autonomy.

    Slaves are goods that belong entirely to the slave owner, and all the labor gains belong to the slave owner. The slave transport department has no freedom at all, and the slave owner enjoys the life and death of the slave, and can decide the life and death of the slave at will.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    There are significant differences between feudalism and serfdom in the following ways:

    1.Productivity level: The productivity level of feudal society was higher than that of slave society.

    In feudal society, peasants had more freedom and rights, they could own their own property and could earn income by cultivating their own land. In a slave society, slaves were treated as property, unable to own their own land and property, and the fruits of their labor were all owned by the slave owner.

    2.Characteristics of production relations: In feudal society, the landlord class held the ownership of the vast majority of the land, and the peasants had no land or little land.

    In order to survive, the peasants had to rent the landlord's land, and they were not allowed to stop or depend on the landlord, and they were not entitled to real freedom. Whereas, under serfdom, serfs were tied to the land and had to be dependent on the serf owners.

    3.Form of land rent: In feudal society, the peasants paid most of the products of their labor to the landlords as rent, and only a small part of them survived. Under serfdom, serfs were required to cultivate the lord's land without compensation, perform various forms of labor, and hand over most of the products of their labor.

    To sum up, there are significant differences between feudalism and serfdom in terms of the level of productive forces, the characteristics of production relations, and the form of land rent. Under the feudal system, the peasants were relatively free and had their own property and land, while the serfs were completely dependent on the serf owners and had no freedom and rights.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Slavery: two classes, landlords and slaves. Slaves had no personal freedom. Everything produced must be handed over to the landlord (note: all hands over).

    Serfdom: landlords and serfs. Serf Na Quarrel was a union of peasants and slaves.

    But as a serf, he had personal freedom compared to the slave who served him; Although he was bound by the land and had to pay a certain tax to the landlord, he could keep it, although it was pitiful, but it was better than the slave's complete handover.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Linong: A kind of land exploitation and personal dependency relationship in ancient Rome, Linong originally referred to the tenants who leased other people's land, and were free people who enjoyed civil rights.

    Serfs: During the feudal period, feudal lords or serf owners owned most of the means of production such as land, mountains, forests, grasslands and rivers, and partially owned serfs; The serfs received a share of the land from the serf owners, and in return they had to cultivate the lord's land without compensation, perform all kinds of labor, and turn over most of the products of their labor.

    A slave is a complete loss of personal freedom, a complete loss of personal family, marriage, and property, and a serf is different, he is not free, but he has a relatively independent economy, and he has a small piece of property assigned to him by his lord.

Related questions
6 answers2024-07-15

Summary. Hello, I'm glad to answer for you, the following is the answer to your query, I hope it will help you: the seventh day of the sixth month of the lunar calendar in 1995 is about 6 7 o'clock to give birth to a girl. >>>More

13 answers2024-07-15

To apply for business, the GMAT applies to all majors, but the specific requirements of each business school are different, and some business schools may agree to the GRE instead of the GMAT, which needs to be verified by the school you want to apply to**. However, for students who are looking for business schools, taking the GMAT is the best choice. You can take one of the GMAT and GRE tests, and you don't need to take both tests. >>>More

5 answers2024-07-15

I think that to distinguish the usage of some prepositions, it is better to find the corresponding scene, so that the understanding will come quickly!

5 answers2024-07-15

Love in**. If a boy had ever stood on the moon.

Heaven will gather their angels. >>>More

11 answers2024-07-15

Juwan Howard.

In the 1999-2000 season, Juwan Howard ranked second with the Washington Wizards in points per game. >>>More