How to understand the essence of science is the theoretical relationship between man and nature

The essence of man and nature is that man cannot do without nature, but nature can exist without man (when man is gone). Human beings obtain the necessities of survival from nature, thus influencing nature, and nature gradually changes and changes the living environment of human beings in human activities, thus affecting human beings.

A social material exchange relationship.

Marx: Man himself is a product of nature, developing in and with his environment.

Nature should be the mother of humanity.

The wise ancient Chinese, how did they define the relationship between man and nature? The face is incredible!

One, nature is objective. In dealing with the relationship between man and nature, we must first respect nature and act in accordance with the laws of nature.

Second, man is not powerless in the face of nature. People can understand nature and use it for the benefit of mankind. In dealing with the relationship between man and nature, it is also necessary to give play to people's subjective initiative.

Third, in short, man should not only respect nature, but also transform nature. Learn to live in harmony with nature and be a friend of nature.

Respect nature, love animals, remember their own insignificance, and treat all beings with an equal attitude.

A little superficial understanding, welcome to shoot bricks.

Personally, I think. Exploring or debating the relationship between scientific theories and the natural world is inseparable from philosophy and religion.

Scientific theories are the elaboration of various natural phenomena and natural rules, which can be verified and falsified. For a particular natural phenomenon, there should be only one scientific theory that can explain it.

In religion and philosophy, there are also many theories that are ultimate speculations or assumptions about the natural world, which can be said to be non-scientific, but it cannot be said that they are unreasonable. Before the theory of relativity and quantum science are confirmed by experiments, how different can they be from religion?

Since human beings appeared on the world, they have tried various ways to understand the natural world in which they live. Before the advent of scientific theories, religious theories were dominant, but in those days, people's social activities were also inseparable from science. The astronomical calendar, metallurgical tools, and animal husbandry all conform to scientific theories and rules.

Therefore, the history of science was even earlier than religion, but at that time, a relatively unified and perfect theoretical system had not yet been formed.

The establishment and development of scientific theories have enabled mankind to understand the natural world and master the natural world to achieve great progress and development. Under the guidance of these scientific theories, human civilization has developed rapidly to the glory it is today, and it will continue to accelerate in the next few years.

The natural world and its rules have been there since ancient times, waiting for the gradual discovery and perfection of scientific theories, which are still pitiful compared to the huge information contained in nature. Such a small theory is already huge in the eyes of human beings, and a person cannot grasp everything in his lifetime.

Based on the need to understand the natural world, scientific theories have developed to this day, and they are not like science in the traditional sense.

From classical physics to relativity to quantum science, the development of scientific theories is increasingly pointing to what Taoism and Buddhism call nothingness.

A lot of math ** looks more like philosophy**.

I don't know what the future of scientific theories will look like, whether they will be able to reach or approach the ultimate truth of nature. I'm pessimistic, I'm afraid this will not be completed until human beings have reinvented themselves or evolved.

If there is a box, we can't see the structure inside. The box could not be opened for fear of damaging it. This type of box is called a black box.

According to idealistic epistemology, the natural world is the emergence of the human mind; From the point of view of materialist epistemology, scientific theories are objective reflections of the natural world. Although the conclusions of the above two views are different, they have one thing in common, that is, they both believe that there is only a change in quantity, and that the theory is essentially the same as that of nature. However, this traditional one-dimensional view of knowledge is questionable.

If the theory is correct, the understanding loses the impetus for further development; If the theory is wrong, the knowledge loses its meaning. Moreover, in the course of human understanding, theories are neither gradually approaching a certain limit, nor can they be absolutely confirmed by experiments. For example, the world of classical mechanics is mechanical, the world of general relativity is geometric, and the world of quantum mechanics is probabilistic.

These worlds have nothing to do with each other, and none of them are the natural world, and I believe that in the future, there will be more theoretical worlds. According to the two-dimensional view of cognition, science is the interaction between man and the natural world; As a result of interactions, science is different from the two sides of the interaction, i.e. from man or nature. Although the two-dimensional view of knowledge does not require absolute confirmation from experiments and logical connections between different theories, the question arises as to why theories are so effective in predicting physical phenomena as they are different from the natural world.

In other words, why is it that theories that are valid at this stage will inevitably be replaced by very different theories in the future? If there is no right or wrong (relative to nature) in theory, then what are the criteria for choosing a theory? According to cybernetics, nature is a black box that cannot be opened.

Harmonious coexistence between man and nature is one of the basic characteristics of a harmonious socialist society. In order to achieve harmony between man and nature, it is necessary to correctly understand the relationship between man and nature.

In the materialist dialectics, everything in the world is a unity of contradictions. The devastated real world we are facing is a contradictory unity composed of human society and the natural world, and the relationship between the two is a dialectical unity.

On the one hand, man and nature are interconnected, interdependent and interpenetrating: man is born out of nature and is himself a part of nature.

Human beings can use nature and transform nature, but in the final analysis, it is a part of nature, and we must take care of nature, and we must not override nature.