When the battle line is too long, how should the assault group face the enemy s counter assault?

Improves the message flow of the front and speeds up some movements.

In the theory of great depth, the breakthrough theory and the pursuit theory are the two most critical components, which constitute the core content of the theory of great depth. Breaking through the enemy's defenses is a prerequisite for conducting a large-depth campaign, and without the completion of a breakthrough, there can be no talk of an offensive in depth.

The theory of great depth holds that by adopting combat reconnaissance, we can detect the enemy's attempts in a timely manner, correct the commander's erroneous judgment, maximize the role of our own artillery fire, inflict huge losses on the enemy, and at the same time pave the way for the offensive of our own follow-up attacking forces and reduce the number of assault troops.

The theory of great depth holds that the commander of a group army should consider a series of factors when choosing the direction of the main assault, such as the campaign intentions of the commander of the front army, the defensive nature and group programming of the enemy army, the terrain conditions, and the condition and capabilities of his own army. In general, two basic requirements must be met to determine the direction of the main assault, that is, it is necessary to break through the enemy's tactical defenses on the first day of the campaign and to ensure that one's assault group advances to the flanks and rear of the defending enemy. Once the main direction of the assault has been determined, the corps with the best equipment and the strongest combat effectiveness should be placed in the direction of the main assault and a high degree of concentration of forces should be concentrated in order to form an advantage over the enemy.

Sudden fire assault is an important means to effectively kill and injure the enemy, and to minimize the time interval between fire preparation and the start of an assault by infantry and tanks, and is also an important condition for achieving a breakthrough.

The Soviet doctrine of large-depth operations was formed by Soviet military strategists on the basis of the experience of the First World War and the Civil War. The theory of large-depth operations emphasizes assault and pursuit, and at the same time takes into account counter-assault.

Marshal of the Soviet Union M. N. Tukhachevsky was the founder of the theory of great depth.

The first to study the idea of the Great Deep Campaign was Trian Dafilov. He proposed that in order to achieve a complete victory over the enemy, it was necessary to carry out a series of successive assaults in order to strike at all the forces of the enemy, disrupt the enemy's organization, and make it impossible for him to continue stubborn resistance.

Operational Theory: Focusing on how to effectively carry out the offensive, Soviet military strategists formed the concept of large-depth operations on the basis of the experience of World War I and the Civil War.

After the First World War, the development of the army and the armed forces was very rapid, the army had new technical equipment, and at the same time new branches of the army had been established in the army. These military advances have greatly increased the power of the offensive, so the military strategists put forward the basic principle of fighting in great depth, stipulating that in the combat formation of corps and troops, an assault group, a diversion group, a reserve group, and a firepower group should be established. Assault groups are used to carry out the offensive in the main assault direction:

The diversion group is used to assist the assault in the direction of operations, and its task is to divert the enemy's attention and ensure the smooth attack of the assault group; Reserves are used to complete tasks that suddenly arise in the course of the battle; The main task of the firepower group is to ensure the rapid breakthrough of the assault group.

Initially, Soviet military experts believed that in order to crush the enemy's huge army group, it was necessary to carry out a series of battles that were connected in time and could lead to victory on all fronts. After analyzing the experience of several wars at that time and the development of new weapons, they came to the conclusion that the enemy could be destroyed by carrying out a series of successive campaigns.

The essence of the theory of continuous campaigns is to consider and prepare the next campaign in the process of implementing the first campaign, so as to prevent interruptions and transport blockages, achieve continuity in combat operations, and not give the enemy time to change deployments and organize battles. The success or defeat of successive campaigns depends mainly on whether the logistics can keep up. According to this theory, the Front Army was considered a strategic unit that carried out the tasks assigned to it by the High Command.

It should command the armies in a theater of operations and should be able to carry out attacks in several operational directions in order to solve a general strategic task. The width of the offensive zone was set at 300-400 km, and the depth of the campaign was set at 200 km. However, with the armed forces equipped with a large number of new and technological weapons, the theory of continuous battles is no longer suitable for the requirements of future wars.

As a result, the theory of large-depth operations came into being.

"Crow" (Germany's) "On War" and Sessler's "Future Shock" and "Infinity".

Hehe, what school are you from? Lu Zhi's? I also wrote about this theme back then. Look at it:

Blitzkrieg has three important elements:

1 surprise attack and 2 episodes.

3 Speed is written around three points, and tactical theory also has three points:

1."Collapse" the space in the shortest possible time;

2.Get the maximum impact with the fastest possible maneuver;

3.Transform spiritual power into combat effectiveness;

Blitzkrieg is mainly divided into these phases:

1.Pre-war preparation stage. The key lies in concentrating a relatively large number of rapid breakthrough troops in relatively concentrated locations without attracting the enemy's attention, so as to form a local advantage of fighting more and fighting less.

2.A quick breakthrough after the start of the war. This is the essence of blitzkrieg, and the "offense" will run through the entire battle.

It's too difficult, Xinhua Bookstore has professional books in this area.

100 points! It's worth copying upstairs very carefully!

Through the flank of the enemy's battle line, carry out long-range attacks to the enemy's rear, and the target is not usually the rear communication buttons, strategic points, command organs, etc., to form an encirclement posture against the enemy in the front; Examples: Operation Left Hook in the First Gulf War, the Battle of Kiev and the Battle of Stalingrad on the Soviet-German battlefield in World War II, etc.

The detour and depth are well understood, all from the guerrilla strategy, to go around to the enemy and give a hard blow.