-
Anonymous users2024-02-13It is from your small things that you can judge whether you have broken the law, and then see if his mood is right for you, and ask questions to help you solve the problem.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-12How terrible can a person who is well-versed in the law and has zero moral values be?
7 in total. Veteran 4200
Concern. A person who is proficient in the law and has zero moral value is a thing that lacks virtue and is terrible (because there is no human taste due to lack of virtue, so he has to use things), because he, in order to achieve ulterior purposes, can not only satisfy his own selfish desires, but also take advantage of the loopholes of the law to play a side ball and let you. It is impossible to grasp the evidence of violations and crimes, and it is impossible to publicly condemn and uphold justice.
There is nothing the law can do with him, because he will not make it public, and it is obvious that he will violate the law. The law enforcement agencies can't catch his hand, so how can they punish him? He can even pretend to be a serious expert, but deep down he is dirty, dark and terrifying.
The purpose of being proficient in the law is to deal with the law, and morality is zero for oneself due to lack of morality. In reality, there may be such people, but there are not too many, because things with zero morality are not only inappropriate for society, but also a burden to people. Therefore, a person who is proficient in the law and has zero moral values is too terrible to say.
Let's just say that the real horror is extreme.
The sky is high and the height is 814
Concern. Why do you like to talk about zero now? Is it taking care of people on opposite sides? What is so terrible about having zero moral values! It's not a loss, you can win him to stand on your side!
-
Anonymous users2024-02-11People who don't understand the law are not terrible, but what is terrible is knowing the law and breaking the law.
Objectively speaking, in any society, there are very few people who understand the law. This is one of the reasons why the profession of lawyer exists.
The fact that the profession of lawyer in our society is rarely applied in various fields is not because we have many people who understand the law, but on the contrary, we are accustomed to the social operation mode in which power and favor are higher than legal principles.
The reason for the smooth functioning of society is not that the majority of people understand the law, but that one of the principles of law is the common moral standard of society. Simplicity of general knowledge and morality maintains the stability of society in daily life.
In fact, the ruling class does not want to see a world where everyone understands the law, and it will certainly not be a stable world.
Know the law, abide by the law, and use the law
To know the law is to understand and know all kinds of laws and regulations.
The law is to deeply understand the content and meaning of the law.
To abide by the law is to exercise one's rights and fulfill one's obligations in strict accordance with the law.
Usage means that the legal rights and freedoms of others will be fully respected; Actively seek legal means to resolve disputes and disputes, and consciously use the law to protect their legitimate rights and interests; will take the initiative to resist acts that undermine law and order.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-10**of**, ignore it.
The service of the summons by the court shall be carried out in accordance with the method stipulated in the Civil Procedure Law, and there is no such method as "** service". The landlord can rest assured.
There are six ways for the people's court to serve:
1) Direct delivery, directly delivered to the recipient for receipt.
2) When the person to be served in retention in custody unreasonably refuses to accept the litigation documents, the person serving the litigation is to place the litigation documents in the residence of the person to be served in accordance with law.
3) Entrusted service: When the people's court responsible for hearing the civil case has difficulty directly serving the litigation documents, it is to lawfully entrust another people's court to serve it on its behalf.
4) Delivery by mail.
5) Referral service, there are three situations of transfer service: 1If the recipient is a military member, it shall be transferred through the political organ of the unit at or above the regimental level to which he belongs; 2.
Where the person to be served is imprisoned, it is to be transferred through the prison or re-education through labor unit where they are located; 3.Where the recipient is currently undergoing re-education through labor, it is to be transferred through their re-education through labor unit.
6) Service of public notices: The court is to make the litigation documents public by means of posting announcements, publishing newspapers, etc., and after a certain period of time, it is legally deemed to have been served.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-09It's definitely ****.
If you are really not at ease, you can call ** to the Intermediate People's Court for inquiry.
The back of each courier company's express bill has stated the exemption clause, you can find that you can find that it is basically stipulated that under the premise of not insuring the price, in case of loss and damage, the courier company's compensation liability is 2 or 3 times the freight, and the maximum compensation is 5 times, depending on which courier company. That's right, this is an overlord clause, but if you need the services of the courier company, you have to accept such a clause, and under the premise of no insurance price, the courier company will pay the original price, which is already good.
There's really nothing you can do. If the trouble is so bad, as long as it doesn't hurt people, it's just a violation of the public security administration punishment regulations. >>>More
This kind of case may be handled by the public security organs as joint fraud, but the premise of joint fraud is that your mother and that person have discussed the matter before, that is, the agreement in law, from your statement, it is obvious that the two did not have a prior agreement, so that the public security organs will investigate and collect evidence, when your mother gave the person's mobile phone and ID card, whether anyone was present at the time, if so, ask the person present to testify and clear your mother's suspicion, and at the same time, contact the person's family, they definitely do not want the son to be arrested, Make your position clear and let them make their own choices; If the police don't file a case, the case is a civil case, and they can ask your mother to pay at most, because that person deceived the family to put the money on the card in your mother's name, and he wants to take out the money, he must go to the bank, and the bank usually has monitoring equipment, and you apply to the court to let them call up the monitoring to prove that your mother has not gone to withdraw the money at all, and the mobile phone is beneficial to your mother.
1. A helps B fight: Did B let A fight, or did B not let A fight or A voluntarily helped? >>>More
The no-fault liability principle applies to this incident, which means that you are liable regardless of whether you are at fault or not. >>>More