Buddhist Consciousness and Dialectical Materialism Seek detailed science Thanks!

Updated on history 2024-07-27
15 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    Tang Xuanzang's "Theory of Enlightenment" is about enlightenment.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    You can take a look at Master Taixu's "The Theory of Law and Wisdom".

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Consciousness, also known as mindfulness, refers to the laws of the world, which are manifested by mindfulness, because all laws are not separated from consciousness, so it is called wisdom.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The meaning of the concept of consciousness.

    In Indian Buddhism, the Middle Mahayana Buddhist sect that emerged after Madhyamaka Buddhism is called the "Yoga School". Yoga should be translated as "correspondingly" and is a practice similar to meditation. The "yogis" of Buddhism are Buddhist practitioners who take "only the perception of the Dharma" as the core and "turn knowledge into wisdom" to achieve Buddhahood.

    After the texts of the Yoga School were translated into China, a sect was formed in the Tang Dynasty, commonly known as the "Dharma Aspect Wisdom Sect".

    Resources.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    The theory of entering the bodhisattva line promoted by Khenpo Sodaji is explained from the perspective of Madhyamaka.

    The Great Khenpo is a descendant of the Madhyamaka Prasangika school. He is a famous contemporary monk.

    Regarding Madhyamaka, the judgment of the teachings of the Enlightenment School, the theory of entering the profession has been clearly stated.

    I'm going to say here about the teachings of Madhyamaka by the Enlightenment School:

    What I studied was the Dharma-Xiang-Consciousness School of the Enlightenment-only sect. That is what Khenpo Sodaji said, the Truth Enlightenment Sect).

    The Enlightenment Sect judged all the teachings of Shakyamuni Buddha as the Three Seasons Teachings.

    Among them, the Hinayana Buddhism is judged to be the first "teaching", which is what the Buddha said to the Xiaogen people.

    Among them, the Madhyamaka school, with Prajna as the core, is judged to be the "empty teaching" of the second time. It was the Buddha who said it to the people of Nakone.

    Among them, the Enlightenment School that solves the deep secrets is judged to be the "Middle Taoism" of the third time. It was the Buddha who said it to the Shanggen people.

    In this way, the core of the controversy between the Enlightenment School and the Madhyamaka School is the controversy between the second and third teachings.

    Both sides have all of them, concrete evidence from the Buddhist scriptures.

    The evidence of the Enlightenment Sect is that in the Profound Tantra, there is no self-nature.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    One is everything, and everything is one.

    Look at the protons, neutrons, and electrons of atoms, like the sun, moon, and stars in the sky. Macro ** goes, its big is nothing else; Micro ** go, its small no inside. Emptiness gives birth to all things, and all laws return to emptiness.

    Eternity is instantaneous, and eternity is instantaneous.

    The Vimala Sutra says: "If there are sentient beings who are happy to live in the world for a long time, and those who can survive it, the bodhisattva will act for seven days as a calamity, so that the other sentient beings will be called a calamity; Or if there are sentient beings who are not happy to live for a long time, but they can be saved, the bodhisattva will make one eons become seven days, and the other sentient beings will be called seven days. ”

    The roots and dust are of the same origin, and the bindings are the same.

    Human perception of sight, hearing and perception and the natural environment of the outside world are produced in time, and it is meaningless to have only eyes, ears, nose, tongue and body without the external world and only the external world without eyes, ears, nose, tongue and body. Bondage and liberation are all in the human mind; There is no bondage without a mind, and there is no liberation without a mind.

    From the dust, there is a phase because of the root.

    Because of the external realm, people have the awareness of seeing and hearing; Because of people's eyes, ears, nose, tongue and body, there are all kinds of complicated worlds.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    The Buddha only talked about how you practice, because it is only through practice that you attain enlightenment that you can find the exact answer. is the so-called "now" that his old man pays attention to.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    These are all things that people think, and if there is no one, there will naturally be no gods and Buddhas.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Too lazy to look at you so much, God does not exist, we live in the objective world, ancient science is not developed, ancient people did not understand some phenomena, explained as gods, but the development of modern science, many things that were considered gods in ancient times have been explained, and if there are more explanations, God is gone.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Of course, Buddhism also speaks of God, but this god is not another god. The gods of Buddhism are a higher form of life called "celestial beings", that is, beings in the heavenly realm. This sentient being also has death, but it has a longer lifespan, and it is more spiritual than humans.

    --Buddhism is atheist. The so-called gods in Buddhism are only deified thoughts.

    The problem with my friend is that you are taking China's Ma Zhe as materialism. China's Ma Zhe cannot be called a philosophy in the strict sense, but only an ideology. Don't compare the many inconsistencies in Ma Zhe's work, even those Marxist-Leninist experts have been unable to justify themselves for many lifetimes, and if they really justify themselves, won't it really become a systematic ideology?

    Do you still need to call it an academic joke?

    You should go and study Western philosophy, where materialism, idealism and materialism in Chinese Ma Zhe, idealism are not the same thing at all. I won't say much here, it's not so easy to explain, if I make it clear so easily here, what kind of philosophy major is there, what kind of doctor of philosophy do you want?

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    I admire the landlord for being so shrewd! It's hard to find!

    Albert Einstein's **, these words:

    If there is any coexistence of religion and modern science, it is Buddhism. He added: "Buddhism is the source of strength for all science. He also talked about whether in his autobiography he was a religious believer, but if so, he wanted to be a Buddhist.

    Time, space and matter are only fantasies.

    I perform my suffering, which is usually non-a**, is relative, is the theory of relativity of impermanence...> for the transcendent relative only to use "unbelievable" it. In fact, here the "incredible" incomprehensibility is not unthinkable, but should not be used solid?

    There are limitations to the way people think, to understand.

    But they can't say that we can only play **, because too many people who can't understand the first point of the road, just too much of our understanding of the beginning of the road to the end, though!

    Like an 80-year-old man and a 15-year-old child who say, "I know what love tastes like", mostly belong to the latter.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Albert Einstein said that time and space are just human illusions... So all that's left is human consciousness. Buddhism says that all laws are only aware of the present, and practice is also the cultivation of thoughts. . .

    The doctrine of the world is inherently contradictory and unified, Buddhism talks about mutual ability, and when it comes to the ultimate state, both can die, and the doctrine of the world is not immutable, Newton was rebuked by Einstein, Einstein was rebuked by Hawking, Buddhism is the law of truth, no matter what age and what race is constantly troubled and delusional, Buddhism is the law of destroying delusions, which will never deteriorate.

  13. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Well, so the meaning of 'material' in dialectical materialism is not 'material', but more abstract material existence.

    Broadly speaking, um, you know, um, it's not exactly the same, but at least at some level.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    "The Buddha said Maitreya. The primordial bodhisattva plays about the immeasurable faults. I will say that there are twenty kinds.

    What is the name of the cloud twenty kinds? One is that there are many afflictions in the present. The two grow resentment, retreat, and endure humiliation.

    The three are annoyed by the resentments. The four demons and the demons are all happy. The five are not born, and the good roots are not born.

    The six have given birth to good roots, and can make them retreat. The seven increase the heart of fighting and resentment. The Eight create the karma of hell.

    The Nine deserve the fruit of ugliness and unkindness. The tongue of the ten is not soft, and the words are astringent. The teachings of the eleventh cannot be remembered.

    The twelve are unheard and unheard. The thirteen are all good and knowledgeable. The knowledge of the fourteen evils should be encountered quickly.

    Fifteen cultivators are difficult to renunciate in the Tao. Sixteen are unhappy, and the words are often heard. Seventeen are in the midst of many doubts.

    Eighteen people often have difficulties and do not listen to the Fa-rectification. There are many obstacles to the practice of the White Dharma. Twenty are used for many grievances.

    Maitreya. It is for the Bodhisattva to talk about twenty kinds of dramas. “

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    I really like to read the Profound Tantra....The most important classic of Consciousness-Only, but I really haven't turned over any of the texts of Consciousness-Only, so naturally I read the commentaries and explanations of this Consciousness-only Buddhist scriptures, and I also repeatedly and arbitrarily speculated on some concepts, and sometimes I can happen to be correct about the above point. But I still like to read....I am not ready to have a plan for the study of only knowledge, as some of the predecessors of the study of Buddhism have admonished: only knowledge must not be refined.

    Foolish me personally, "Amitayus Sutra", "Sutra of the Altar of the Six Patriarchs", "Diamond Sutra", "Chinese Mahayana Buddhism", "Zengyi Aham Sutra", "Explanation of the Profound Secret Sutra"...I studied all the way, but I didn't pay attention to understanding only consciousness, because Buddhism has to be realized.

Related questions
7 answers2024-07-27

1 False, the difference between humans and animals is that humans have subjective initiative, animals only have instincts, and humans can change the status quo through breeding efforts, while animals can only continue to adapt, but the essence of social life has objectivity. >>>More

6 answers2024-07-27

The dialectical materialist view of matter is that the physical object and the material are nothing more than the sum of all kinds of things, and the concept of matter is abstracted from this sum. Matter is the philosophical category that marks the objective reality that man perceives through his senses, which exists independently of our senses, and is reproduced, photographed, and reflected by our senses. The material category of philosophy is defined by the relationship between matter and consciousness. >>>More

9 answers2024-07-27

The basic feature of the dialectical materialist view of nature is the unity of materialism and dialectics. >>>More

9 answers2024-07-27

One: We often divide animals and humans into two different species. (This is the premise, that is to say that in philosophy man is not an animal, they are discussed separately) >>>More

11 answers2024-07-27

First of all, dialectical materialism is definitely correct, and secondly, it means that matter is the origin of the world, and some of its statements are scientific, such as the connection between development and contradiction.