The professor of Xiamen University proposed to punish those who did not have babies, whose cheese di

It may be the cheese that has moved the feudal customs, after all, they feel that if they do not have children, it will lead to a decrease in fertility. Ageing is getting worse. The country may not be able to progress.

If you don't have a baby, some industries related to children will go out of business, and many factories will not be able to recruit people.

Some elders are more traditional, they will not allow their offspring not to have children, and if the birth rate is low, it will also have a certain impact on social development, so this professor will say this.

All walks of life, including the economy, including the real estate industry, will lead to a decline in the birth rate, and a decline in the birth rate will lead to an economic downturn, which will also affect the demand for real estate.

A professor at Xiamen University said that to punish those who do not have children, in fact, it is better to reward those who have children than to punish, so that it is a positive guidance.

In fact, I think this statement is too blind and arbitrary. There must be a reason why others don't want to have children.

Xiamen University professor said that he would punish not having children, why is this? Well, actually, I think these are moving, literally nothing else.

Everyone should know about this census. You can tell the numbers. We are Chinese. Aging is very severe. If you don't solve it now, it will be even more troublesome later.

People don't say such things!

With the change of national policy, the state has encouraged more children, but because having more children will bring a problem, that is, having more children, your own economic conditions cannot keep up.

The professor of Xiamen University suggested punishing people who do not have children, and linking the birth of children to pensions, which I think has a certain degree of reasonableness and also certain drawbacks.

The state encourages more children, but progress has been slow. In the past, many people had children, mainly because there was a saying that more people are stronger, but now this is not the case, because everyone is under more pressure, not only to pay off the mortgage, but also to support the elderly and so on.

Everyone wants their children to get ahead, so they will give them the best education, and if they have one more child, then their quality of life will be greatly reduced.

Having one more child means buying one more house, and it is not easy for adults to live, not to mention educating their own children and giving their children the best life, and the most important thing is that there is no one to take care of the children.

A professor at Xiamen University proposed that the birth of children should be linked to affordable housing and pensions, and those who do not have children should be punished. A professor at Xiamen University once said that many people are generally not highly educated, so they urgently need labor to solve the problem of shortage of manpower, and having one more child can earn an extra penny. A professor at Xiamen University suggested that if the state introduces compulsory measures to link the birth of children to capital, and treat those who have children differently from those who do not, so as to promote their enthusiasm.

Personal opinion. In fact, there is some truth in the statement of the professor of Xiamen University, but such a one-size-fits-all policy is not conducive to the policy of having children, because some families are indeed more difficult, so they cannot afford to have children at all, if they cut off the affordable housing and social security that they value most, then they will feel that life is slim, which is not conducive to social stability.

The proposal of the professor of Xiamen University is good, because in a certain way it can greatly promote people to have children.

Epilogue. Everyone's ideas are different, if it is indeed conducive to the implementation of national policies, it can also be considered, but if it is one-sided and one-size-fits-all, then it will make many people disgusted.

I think that having children or not is a person's freedom, and it can't be forced to ask for it, and people who don't want to have children can't be forced to give birth after they have children.

I think his statement is very irrational, there is no one to help take care of the child after giving birth, and many people have taken this issue into account.

I think this is very inappropriate, because if you do this, it will mean that you are forced, and everyone has a different way of life, so there is no need to do it.

I don't think this kind of suggestion is worth advocating, and it is not very feasible, and it is a burden for many families.

This is a test, and a policy will probably come out after a while.

As long as you are a little older, you will see this kind of thing a lot. Step by step to test the people's bottom line, step by step to disintegrate the people's sense of resistance, and finally when the resistance becomes a minority, it is time to enforce it.

The views released by the professor of Xiamen University were not recognized by netizens, and the professor of Xiamen University suggested at the meeting that having children is linked to capital. That is to say, if our country advocates having a second child, advocating having a second child, and advocating having a third child, then the state will also give some subsidies. And the professor said that if there are no children, then the share of capital should be reduced at the level.

In this way, it can make having a child a meaningful thing, and it can also motivate everyone to be more willing to have children.

The university professor's statement was not recognized, and what the university professor said was indeed not recognized, and he felt that having a child was completely up to personal wishes. Moreover, the state advocates having three children, and if there is a subsidy, then if you don't have a child, that is, if there is no subsidy, why should you reduce the original capital of others? I don't want to have children, that is, because everyone now thinks that raising a child does cost a lot of thought, and it also costs a lot of money.

In addition, some young people mature relatively late, and they may still feel that they are a child, so how can they educate the children who are born?

Having a baby is a matter of personal wishesIf the parents' minds are immature and they have to give birth to their children, then is it irresponsible for the children? Nowadays, many young people like the post-90s, as well as the post-00s themselves, say that it is very selfish to say that a month's salary may not be enough for their own expenses. If you want to get married and invest your salary in the family and your children, this is not enough, and many young people also feel that this kind of married life is a headache to think about.

The premise of having a child is that parents can take responsibility, but some young people feel that starting a family also requires marriage and having children, so everyone's thoughts are different, and this university professor's statement is too one-sided. In fact, some overly absolute statements will indeed make netizens feel angry, and if this university professor can look at this matter from a neutral point of view, he will not be scolded so badly.

Such a view can have a serious impact and will reduce one's reputation, and many people will hold an objection because people do not have children because the pressure of life is too great, and the fundamental problem is not solved at all, and it will also be resisted by many young people.

The harm is particularly serious, which will lead to an increasingly serious aging population, which in turn will lead to a lower and lower birth rate, and finally lead to a slower and slower development rate of the country, and will also affect the social process and international status, which is simply not reasonable.

It will provoke the contradiction between single, unmarried, infertility and other people, resulting in social differentiation and social injustice; violates the notion of the freedom to marry; It can also lead to a massive brain drain; Crack down on the enthusiasm of the masses for labor.

I think his mind is distorted, and he probably didn't have to have his own children to have such a strange idea. Let's not talk about anything else, let's just say that the matter of having children is everyone's freedom, and no one has any reason to decide whether others should have children or not, do you still live in a feudal society? Do you also have to take care of other people's children?

So have you ever considered why so many people don't want to have children? His kind of thinking is completely a manifestation of standing and talking without back pain, and punishing people who don't have children, try it yourself.

Why do so many people choose not to have children now? Because the pressure of having a child is not something that an ordinary family can afford, who doesn't want to give their child the best living environment and educational conditions, but before he was born, he knew that he could not provide a good environment for his child, so why choose to give birth to his child and suffer? In fact, every pair of parents is great, no parent will not like children, but who will solve the pressure caused by having children?

Even many married couples do not have the money to buy their own houses, not even houses, and it has become difficult to settle down, not to mention that now children need school district housing, otherwise they may not even be able to go to school, under this heavy pressure, how can they ensure that they raise a child healthy and happy, no one wants to let their children suffer from pain and have a future that does not see the future at all.

In addition to these objective conditions, there are so many pregnant women with depression who continue to lose their lives every year, who will solve these problems? An unhappy marriage, can having children give him a happy family? We have watched so much news and witnessed the birth of so many tragedies, who would want to choose such a life, no one does not yearn for a happy life, not to mention that the divorce rate is so high now, how can you raise a child with such a relationship?

The values of this professor are very interesting. Reproduction is something that must be done in the development of human society until now. Therefore, it is also necessary for every family to have children.

Not true, such values are not desirable, everyone has the freedom of their own life, and it cannot be forced to have children or not to have children.

Such values are incorrect, everyone has different ideas, and some people just feel that children are particularly irritable, so they are reluctant to have children.

Of course, I disagree with the professor. I think everyone has the right to make their own choices in life, and we shouldn't make choices according to other people's ideas.

I think this professor's proposal is very bad, everyone has the right to choose whether to have children or not.

I disagree that women are not machines for giving birth to children, and there should be no punishment for having children, and this suggestion has violated women's reproductive rights and freedoms.