Why are houses built higher and higher? Why are more and more houses being built?

On the one hand, land resources are scarce, especially in big cities, where land is expensive, so the building has to be built higher. On the other hand, construction technology is becoming more and more mature, and building high-rise buildings is like walking on the ground, and it can also fully demonstrate its technological and economic strength. So, the building is built higher and higher!

The higher the house is built, why is buying an 18-story house a "watershed"? Industry experts have the answer.

With the development of the property market, not only housing prices, but also height, some people say that the height of a single floor is insufficient, but the overall height of the building has gradually increased, the concept of small high-rise and high-rise has been constantly refreshed, and the real estate in many places has exceeded twenty or thirty floors, and it is not uncommon to have forty or fifty floors of building height.

Recently, it has been reported that the house is being built higher and higher, and the people who buy the house are becoming more and more entangled, and now many people say that it is best not to buy more than 18 floors, which is a "watershed", and the agreeers and opponents are bustling, inconclusive, and there are different opinions on this statement, so what is the basis for this statement, is there any reason? Relevant industry experts have given answers to this question for the reference of home buyers.

First of all, there is indeed a priority floor for the selection of floors, generally from the perspective of living, most of them regard 1 3-2 3 floors as the relatively best floor, which is from the elevator use and the comfort of daily living, there is a certain reason.

However, for the 18th floor is a watershed statement but there is a special reason, for high-rise living, the elevator dependence is very large, once there is a power outage and other unexpected situations, the 18th floor is already a test for the physical strength of the residents, often dozens of floors of high commuting really has too many troubles, life also has a great impact.

Secondly, the higher the floor of the residence, although it looks very tall, but the population density concentration also leads to the high frequency of elevator use, over time, elevator damage is inevitable, so the general community is the higher the floor, the property fee to be paid is relatively high, for residents, the same environment and the same life, the price to be paid is relatively high, so the blind pursuit of height has a certain price.

The vacancy rate of commercial housing in the country has reached, why is there an oversupply of houses, but housing prices have not declined, the more houses are more expensive, the most important and direct factor to promote housing prices is land, land will always account for the majority of the overall cost of commercial housing. The cost of land acquisition by developers is high, and housing prices are naturally low.

Because a city is so big, there is also some space to build public facilities, parks, etc.

In addition, while the new town was being built, many old towns were not demolished because they still had to exist.

Comparatively, there is even less land to build new urban areas.

And people's demand for housing is getting bigger and bigger, can not be developed horizontally, can only develop vertically, to build high, no matter how high it is, the area of the whole building is unchanged.

The higher the house is built, the main thing is to save costs.

Why are houses built higher and higher? The higher the house is built, the smaller the footprint is.

There are many reasons for this situation, such as the lack of new buildings, or the saturation state, or it may be the cause of the impact of the epidemic, etc.

The total number of old city renovations will be reduced. After more than 20 years of urban construction, the situation of "large-scale demolition and large-scale construction" of the old city will gradually disappear.

The housing market has been largely balanced, and there will be no significant increase in the number of housing areas per capita. At present, the per capita area of imitation surplus houses in China has reached 50 square meters, and the requirements for housing improvement of families in difficulty have gradually decreased.

In the future, although there will continue to be a demand for housing improvement, it is only partial and structural, and on the whole, the phenomenon of insufficient per capita housing area will gradually disappear.

Urbanization will slow down. China's urbanization level is already relatively high, and the growth rate will be significantly reduced in the future. The urbanization rate is expected to grow from the current 60% to 70%, the increase in the urbanization rate is facing a ceiling phenomenon, the growth rate of the urban population is slowing down, and it is impossible to grow by a few percentage points per year in the future, and the demographic dividend of urbanization will gradually disappear.

The quality of housing has improved substantially. In 2012, the then Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development issued a residential quality standard, which regulated the construction quality of various commercial houses such as residential and office buildings, and raised the safety standard period of about 30 years for commercial housing to at least 70 years, or even 100 years. This means that after 2010, all kinds of commercial houses newly built in the city can theoretically be used for 70 100 years, which means that the amount of depreciation and renovation in the old city will be greatly reduced.

Assuming that a city has a housing stock of 1 billion cubic metres and a depreciation period of 30 years, about 30 million square metres of houses are demolished and rebuilt each year, and if the depreciation period becomes 100 years, the average number of houses rebuilt per year is just over 10 million square metres.

**What is the order of collapse of high-rise buildings when it comes? Which one is more secure in the senior and the lower level when it happens? Complete the expert's explanation.

The current floor can be said to be the higher it is, the tallest building in the world is 828 meters, 162 floors, and then if you encounter **, living at a high level of security or potential security? Many people believe that people who live at the bottom are the safest because they are close to the ground and can easily escape; Plus those who live at the bottom, know that ** is about to reach the senior people.

Of course, some people think that living at the highest level, because high-rise buildings are designed with an increase in the wind resistance coefficient. I've been talking about the internet about this question and everyone's answer is different, and everyone has their own opinion and analysis.

But in fact, no matter how many floors you live in, it's not safe, **level, if it's some small or medium**, then the person who lives at the bottom may be safer, because during ** the house is generally broken, the first collapse is a high-rise house, the bottom is still there, and because of the ground, the chances of rescue are great.

However, if you encounter a level such as Wenchuan, the building collapses from the ground, and the chances of survival this time are basically zero. But if you live in a premium class, you can hide high-rise toilets and small spaces. It may be safe, but don't use the elevator, don't run to the balcony, calm down, you'll chant silently:

You will save me! Security structure location, frame structure, brick hybrid structure, generally high-rise buildings are frames, if it is not a tofu project, please do not look high, it is not folded. The bathroom and the small room are very secure and also safe next to the anvil water pipe.

The corners are relatively safe. It's best to hide** and turn to the relative safety mentioned above. The general problem is not huge.

I think that as the houses in small cities become more and more durable, the urbanization gets better and better, and the houses will definitely become less and less valuable. This is determined by the relationship between supply and demand, first, because the size of the city is not necessarily related to the level of housing prices, second, because houses in well-developed small cities will be very popular, and third, because only houses in cities with poor conditions will be worthless.

The first reason is that there is no correlation between the size of the city and the price of housing. It is a very clear fact that whether a house in a city is worth money or not is closely related to the state of the city. But that doesn't mean that a house in a small city isn't worth much.

There is no correlation between the size of a city and the price of a city. The factor that is really closely related to the ** of the house is the state of development of the city. Only when the city is in good condition can the city house be more valuable.

The second reason is that well-developed houses in small cities will be very popular. Small cities seem to have limited conditions and lack of attractiveness. There are small but well-developed cities that are very popular with small but well-developed cities.

In addition, although the economic development status of some small cities is not too high, the urban environment is very good, the livability is very high, and it is very comfortable to live in such a city, and the houses in this small city will also be very popular.

The third reason is that only a house in a city with poor conditions will be worthless. For a city with good conditions, the development is good and the city is vibrant, and the houses in the city will be very popular. However, for those cities with poor conditions and unsatisfactory development status, few people pay attention to the houses in these cities due to various reasons such as limited economic conditions and a decrease in the number of residents.

All in all, this situation does exist in some small cities that are not in a good state of development. Houses in these small cities are indeed going to become less and less valuable.

1. It is an indisputable fact that there are more and more houses.

In the past ten years, the average annual area of commercial housing completed is more than 1 billion square meters, and in 2017 and 2018, the sales area of commercial housing in the country has reached a historic 1.7 billion square meters.

The main problem is reflected, the housing population in the first and second-tier cities is concentrated, but the ** is insufficient, resulting in higher and higher housing prices. In many third-, fourth- and fifth-tier cities, there is no shortage of housing difficulties, especially resettlement houses, because of the low cost of demolition, the houses in these places can only be digested within the city, and there is no external investment involved. In a word, the geographical mismatch between housing demand and ** is becoming more and more obvious.

In some places, there are too many houses, and in some places, there are not enough houses.

2. The reasons for the increasing number of "real estate" are deep-seated.

In the city, many of the upstairs and downstairs of the houses we live in are not interconnected, and you don't know what the situation is next door to you or the landlord next door, except for self-occupation, there may be investment, and there may be financial institutions seized. In a city, there must be some unfinished buildings that have been idle for many years. And all this, not only market factors, but also financial problems, lead to the real "real estate" of the house.

Many counties, including some prefecture-level cities, except in the hot period of the property market, most of the time it is still difficult to sell houses, but why in addition to the demand for local investment, most developers are still happy to build houses day after day? The logic insiders know that the house, as a disguised financial product, can be sold better, and if it can't be sold, it can be mortgaged to the bank for money.

3. Finally, on the issue of taxes and fees.

As land prices get higher and higher, developers are taking risks when they get land. You are afraid of the risk and do not take the land, the early stage of the land is sold out, and then face the green and yellow, you try your best to "fight" with other developers to take the land, whether it is the price limit or market reasons, it is possible to lose money. One of the important reasons for this is the "state tax", more than half of the cost of the house we sell is various "taxes", which are included in the entire real estate development process.

Finally, in the long run, relying on real estate to develop the country's economy is obviously unsustainable, and ultimately it is necessary to rely on industry and manufacturing to promote economic and social development.

First of all, the city has a large scale, a high degree of intensive land utilization, a high overall level of land price, and a high proportion of floor land price in the unilateral development cost of housing, and the effect of reducing the unilateral development cost of housing by reducing the floor land price is obvious, while the degree of intensive land utilization in small cities is low, the overall level of land price is low, and the unilateral cost of housing development is mainly affected by the unilateral cost of housing, and the effect of reducing the unilateral cost of housing development by reducing the floor land price is not obvious. Moreover, if the number of floors of the house reaches a certain value, if the number of floors continues to increase, the cost of unilateral projects will be increased;

In addition, large cities have more systematic urban planning data, land development is controlled more strictly, and small city planning control is generally not strict, the determination of the floor area ratio is often arbitrary, many places do not have the floor area ratio of this index limit, or there is, but the control is not strict, and some places ** for the tree city image, often encourage the development of buildings to the air, the higher the better, the floor area ratio in these small towns lack practical significance. Therefore, the larger the scale of the city, the more obvious the impact of the plot ratio on the land price, and the greater the change of the land price with the plot ratio.

Stand higher so you can see farther.

Is bigger a house better? No! The size of the room depends on your own situation and population.

As the saying goes, "too much", advocating the idea of "moderation". The size of the house should be modest. If the house is too large and the population is too small, a sense of emptiness is created, which will lead to more yin and less yang, frequent dark illnesses, and constant entanglement and trouble; However, it is not good to have a house that is too small and too populated, which will not only bring crowding and depression to the occupants, but also affect people's aura, resulting in a situation where there is more sunlight and less shade, making the occupants feel violent, and most members of the family are not the subject of lawsuits.

The house is too large and wastes energy, and as the house grows, the corresponding air conditioning and heating costs will increase significantly. If you can't afford electricity, you can walk two steps from your home and experience the double days of snow and snow.

For large public spaces, relying on a single ordinary cabinet and suspended air conditioner for cooling is basically ineffective, so it is necessary to use ** air conditioner, and the refrigeration speed is much slower.

In addition, a large area of water is dispersed, and the hot water pipes are long. In order to unscrew the faucet so that hot water can flow out, a backflow pump needs to be installed, which also causes a certain amount of gas waste; Don't install it. Putting out a lot of tap water before using hot water is still a waste.

For some families, buying a big house is a heavy burden, just like buying a large displacement car, they will need to continue to burn money in the future, and they even have to give up their original lifestyle to save electricity.

In third- and fourth-tier cities, they can't afford to live in big houses. In order to save money, they decorate very poorly, use electricity to pick and search, and they don't live in the quality of a big house at all.

For many friends, the most immediate burden brought by a large apartment is that it is too difficult to clean! The house is big with many rooms and a lot of furniture. Even with the help of a cleaning robot, the dust on the furniture still needs to be wiped by a human.

It's a very painful thing to put it in the south.