The number of singles exceeds 30 million, and Professor Fudan suggested that polyandry should be

I think polyandry is a major blow to the bottom line of ethics. The custom of three wives and four concubines in feudal society is a kind of dross, and now it is a civilized society where the "monogamy" system is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. If you want to solve the problem of singles through polyandry, and revert to the ugly customs of the feudal period, it is disrespectful to women and trample on civilized society.

According to authoritative data from the National Bureau of Statistics, in 2020, the overall population of the mainland will reach 100 million, including 100 million men and 100 million womenOverall, there are 34.9 million more men than women, but what is more noteworthy is that the sex ratio at birth is still high, that is, for every 100 female babies born now, a male baby will be born, and there are more male babies than female babiesPatriarchalThe problem cannot be ignored.

I think that the problem of singles is only a social problem in the final analysis, but monogamy is the bottom line problem, no matter how far the society develops, it cannot change the rules that should be followed, polyandry is not feasible, and it cannot solve the fundamental problem, it can only produce a lot of new troubles in ethics and morality, and now it is not that feudal society, and those former dross have long been thrown into the trash, I really don't understand what the professor who proposed this plan thinks, and the idea is not not ahead of its time.

The reason for the emergence of singles is also the high bride price, and now the poorer the place in the rural areas, the higher the bride price, which further hinders the marriage of young people of appropriate age, and in recent years, a series of vicious incidents have been triggered by the sky-high bride price, so that this bad social atmosphere has become a hot topic again. The larger the city, the more the economic conditions of the men and women are comparable, the less controversial the bride price. The more remote and economically underdeveloped the rural areas, the higher the bride price.

The custom of bride price has entered a vicious circle in which the more economically backward the bride price burden becomes, resulting in the embarrassment of not being able to marry and not being able to marry in rural areas.

For the singles problem, if the number of singles is too much, it may cause more problems, and it has a great impact on social security and stability, I think it is necessary to strengthen publicity and guide the correct concept of marriage and love, popularize the normal concept of marriage and childbirth, advocate new customs, new fashion, put an end to the style of comparison and sky-high bride price, ** the dregs of traditional thinking of preference for sons over women, so that the gender ratio returns to the normal structure.

At present, the problem of singles cannot be solved in the short term, and single men should give full play to their subjective initiative and make themselves better, so as to get the favor of women and solve the problem of singleness.

No, this could change Chinese society dramatically. The status of men may decline, and you don't have to worry about fate when it comes.

Even if you are a bachelor for a lifetime, you will not accept polyandry, it is difficult to accept polyandry from a moral point of view, and you are unwilling to share your other half with others.

I think that the system of polyandry is not worth advocating, and such a measure is likely to lead to a lot of chaos in society, which is not conducive to the harmonious development of society, and will also lead to a lot of conflicts in the family.

Not very recommended, not that I am more patriarchal personally, and it is also undesirable in terms of moral theory, it requires one woman to have a crush on two men at the same time.

This is not recommended. Polyandry is, in my opinion, against human morality. Because love is single-minded, how can it be controlled on the basis of sharing by many people. Can love be shared? The answer is no.

I agree very much, which shows that the society is constantly developing and the economy is constantly improving, which can greatly reduce the number of singles, and it is also a contribution to society.

I think this is not conducive to the harmonious development of society, and there will be more and more problems in family life, and at the same time, it is also a symptom rather than a cure.

Resolutely oppose polyandry, saying that there are not many realistic love killings, after all, Huang Youguang of Fudan University is a foreigner, and he often sees these men guarding fruit trees at home without going out to work, and can earn a lot of money a year, and his house is still the same, how to find a wife, in Chengdu, Sichuan, a man comes out to work alone, and he paints the wall on the construction site, he can earn 3 to 400 yuan a day, but he can't let go of his itchy hands if he has money, he eats and gambles well, he has his own perfume smell, and his teeth still wear ** teeth, Although I work early every day, I have to sleep on the construction site, and I only work for a few hours a day, so why not find a wife!

Professor Fudan suggested that "polyandry" should be allowed, which I think is unrealistic, and there are enough monogamous family conflicts, so don't look for more trouble.

Take steps as soon as possible to give birth to a girl in a family where the first child is a boy and the second child!

It's not that there are more than 30 million singles, it's that there are 30 million more men than women! Personnel don't understand!

In fact, such a model is impossible to achieve at all, except that there are not enough people in your own country, and you can also intermarry with people from other countries.

Fudan professor Huang Youguang proposed "polyandry" to solve the problem of singles, netizens: It's ridiculous.

Yes, Professor Huang Youguang suggested this, but as expected, his suggestion was directly resisted and criticized by a group of women.

Fudan professor suggests "polyandry". Huang Youguang, a professor at Fudan University, believes that polyandry is in line with China's national conditions and can solve the problem of many men beating singles.

Yes, but such a proposal has caused a lot of controversy, so it has not been implemented relatively, and it is only being discussed at the moment.

This is not feasible. The fundamental problem to be solved is the concept of preference for sons over women, and the improvement of the status of women. In this way, the imbalance between men and women will be alleviated.

It is indeed like this, and this suggestion is very bad and completely does not take into account the reality of the situation.

This is not feasible, although it seems that the status of women has increased, but in fact such a marriage is very painful for women, because one woman is required to serve so many husbands

This is certainly not feasible because it is unfair to men.

It's not feasible, it will make society chaotic, and it will make many men not responsible, and the pressure will be greater.

Later, his proposal was resisted by the people of the whole country, and he was expelled from Fudan University under the abuse of netizens across the country.

Later, this proposal was rejected by everyone, because he thought that his repentant proposal was very illogical, and no one would agree with his suggestion.

But his idea was criticized by many, and people strongly disagreed with his idea, believing it to be impossible.

A Fudan professor pointed out that the main reason why polyandry should be practiced in the current society is that the ratio of men and women in the current society has been seriously unbalanced. It is such a very alternative problem that has attracted widespread attention, and this matter will definitely end in the end of the collection, in today's society, such a system is impossible to achieve and rebels against human morality

1. Violating social morality. The question itself is already contrary to social morality, and there is a great similarity with polygamy in feudal society. In today's modern society, what is more admired is the system of free monogamy, which can better benefit the harmony of the family environment.

If such a system is implemented, it will have a huge impact on society, and it will also produce some social problems that are difficult to solve, and it is a kind of ideological regression, which itself has abandoned the dross of the past and lived in the modern world, but in the end it will have to pick up such cultural dross. <>

Second, men and women should be truly equal. The reason why such statements have been made and sparked widespread discussion in society is because men and women are inherently unequal in today's society. This is because of the rise of feminism, wanting to win more benefits for women, and hoping that everyone can truly achieve equality between men and women, no matter in which aspect they can really know how to respect each other.

The society will become better, and the inequality between men and women will be changed. <>

Third, it illustrates the seriousness of the imbalance between men and women in Chinese society. From this problem, we can also see the seriousness of the imbalance between the ratio of men and women in Chinese society, which has a lot to do with the traditional Chinese concept, many people think that the most unfilial piety has three nos, and they always want to have a boy. Especially in some remote areas, such ideas have always existed, so the current ratio of men and women is very serious, coupled with the impact of family planning, which has further aggravated the problem.

It should be the backlog of social housing prices and bride price, the expectation of marriage is not great, and there is a hope to have a person to talk to.

I don't think that's realistic. In particular, it deviates from traditional Chinese ideology. So there shouldn't be a good ending.

Of course, it is the end of being denied, and this mode of thinking is completely inconsistent with the current mainstream mode of thinking.