There are more than 30 million male singles, and experts suggest that polyandry can be solved, is

It's definitely not feasible, polygamy can live in harmony, but polyandry, I think it's hard to get along with, and it will be **, it's better to stick to monogamy.

It may not be able to solve it, and it is not possible to unilaterally only want to solve the single. You also have to think about it, if you are really polygamous, there will be more problems, such as who is the child, whose surname is it, how to raise it, and so on. You can't tear down the east wall and make up the west wall.

Personally, I don't think this is actually feasible, I don't know who made such a ridiculous suggestion, this suggestion is actually really outrageous, and it is impossible to implement it.

I don't think it's feasible, and it will destroy the normal order of society, and it is not conducive to building a harmonious society.

Of course not. Because this will cause social unrest and make many people unhappy.

Nowadays, the problem of singleness in our country is a big problem. According to statistics, as of 2019, the number of male population in China is 30.49 million more than that of female population. From this set of data, we can see that there will be tens of millions of men in our country who cannot get married and have children.

Without a wife, there is no chance of succession. This is indeed a major problem, and in any country, if there is an imbalance between men and women, it will lead to many social problems. If it is not dealt with effectively, there will be greater social unrest.

So how do you solve this problem? Professor Huang Youguang, academician of the Australian Academy of Social Sciences and distinguished professor of the School of Economics of Fudan University, gave an answer, which became popular on the Internet as soon as it was announced. What is the answer? It will cause such a big heated discussion.

Professor Huang Youguang pointed out that according to the current imbalance between men and women in China, 100 women should correspond to 117 men. In other words, there will be a large number of men who will not be able to find wives. Therefore, if you want to solve this problem, you need to consider the practice of polyandry.

To put it simply, polyandry, he actually corresponds to the polygamy commonly practiced in ancient China, but the ancient polygamy system means that a man can marry multiple wives, while today's polyandry is that a woman can marry more than one man. This system allows women to marry more than one man, just as a man is allowed to marry more than one woman.

But if this is the case, it means that a woman is free to marry more than one man, and this practice is recognized and sanctioned by the law.

Professor Huang elaborated on two of these points. First, it is more convenient for one woman to meet the physiological needs of multiple men than for one man to meet the physiological needs of multiple women. Second, marriage is based on sexuality, which means that a man and a woman have a one-to-one relationship.

Therefore, in the context of considering men and women, it is possible to consider relaxing the limit on the number of pairs. In response to this statement, the female compatriots were extremely angry.

But with thousands of male hormone bursts and nowhere to go, this is indeed a pretty serious problem. But if the pressure to solve this problem is put on women, it makes people feel speechless.

In response to Professor Huang's remarks, many people scolded Professor Huang for contempt for women's rights and unfairness to women, and it was also a great insult to women's human dignity, and they hated this concept of women as objects, and called it feudal garbage and the ideology of the old society.

So how do you fix this?

Now that this problem has arisen, then we should go for it. There used to be a very reasonable suggestion on how to solve this problem.

Some experts believe that China can alleviate the problem of singleness faced by men in China by introducing foreign women, or by combining countries with each other. But the idea of bringing in women from Tao Wan, Belarus, Ukraine, Pakistan, Vietnam and other countries is not currently recognized.

Of course, after all, there is a lot of difference between men and women, so many men can't marry wives and become singles, so polyandry will definitely be able to solve this problem.

Fudan professor Huang Youguang proposed "polyandry" to solve the problem of singles, netizens: It's ridiculous.

Yes. This method may seem absurd, but it may be a good way for so many singles.

I don't think so. Because today's girls are more loyal, they girls are unwilling to accept polygamy, and they all want to treat a lover wholeheartedly.

No, if such a system is implemented, it will be even more detrimental to social development, will cause conflicts between husband and wife, and is not conducive to family harmony.

Those who have the ability and money can marry a foreign woman, and you have heard of a rich man who can't marry a wife, blaming himself for not having the ability.

is still polyandry, men are very realistic, and women can't marry without five million.

Polyandry will not solve such problems, but will only increase the crisis in this area and increase family conflicts.

Let the experts and professors try it first, and if you can, don't prevent promotion.

First, the professor's daughter, daughter-in-law, and wife were used as test subjects.

Now you can mix up any canine and anything, and be a professor!

Pee, are you having a problem, or is there something wrong?

Isn't there a caring robot?

Start by teaching the next generation to wrestle.

I feel that our society is constantly advancing, and polyandry is a barbaric custom of primitive societies that does not fit into our current society.

Because contemporary society advocates equality between men and women, and there are many problems with polygamy, it is not moral.

There are more than 30 million singles in China, and the professor of economics suggests: is it feasible to adopt polyandry?

According to the National Bureau of Statistics, as of 2019, the total population of Chinese mainland exceeded 1.4 billion. Among them, the male population is 715.27 million, and the female population is 684.78 million, and there are 30 million more men than women, which means that in the future, 30 million men will not find the other half and become singles, and this data may continue to grow.

The serious imbalance between men and women will bring about a major social problem that needs to be solved as soon as possible. So,Huang Youguang, a distinguished chair professor at Fudan University's School of Economics and an academician of the Australian Academy of Social Sciences, has proposed a solution, that is, to implement the "polyandry" system. As soon as this proposal came out, it immediately sparked a strong discussion.

The "polyandry" system proposed by Professor Huang Youguang is also practiced in some countries around the world, such as India, Senegal, Egypt, Sudan, etc., most of these countries are more men than women.

In fact, among some ethnic minorities in China, there is also a "polyandry" system, such as Tibetans, Lhoba, Menba, etc., which still continue the ancient marriage system. So, is it feasible to implement a "polyandry" system in China?

First of all, it is difficult to accept from an ethical point of view, both men and women are not willing to share half of themselves with others, and women do not want to have so many husbands, this is already a consensus on ethics and morality, and it is extremely difficult and unacceptable to suddenly change this concept of monogamy and loving only one person in a lifetime.

Second, "polyandry" does not necessarily solve the problem of the imbalance between men and women, because the concept of preference for sons over women does not change, and there is also the problem of the status of women. Especially in rural areas, many people will use B-ultrasound to check whether it is male or female during pregnancy, and if it is female, this phenomenon still exists. Only by changing the idea of preference for sons over women will the imbalance between men and women be slowly alleviated.

Therefore, the "polyandry" system is not very feasible and has met with opposition from the majority of the people. However, for the problem of the imbalance between men and women, economist Ren Zeping has proposed such a solution: "Give priority to the introduction of young single foreign women to solve the problem of gender imbalance in China." ”

For example, many women from Vietnam, Myanmar and other countries have married in Guangxi, Yunnan and other regions of China, and of course, some of them are illegal transactions. There are also European countries such as Ukraine, and some are married to China. However, this kind of voluntary principle is not easy to implement from a policy perspective, and the effect is not very great.

However, more and more young people are choosing not to get married, and the number of single people is as high as 200 million, of which not only 30 million men are singles, but many women also choose to be single. Therefore, the problem of the imbalance between men and women must first be changed from the concept, and the "polyandry" system is more of a gimmick and is not feasible.

This professor began with the man of his family.

Yes, it's a very big and shocking decision. I'm the first to agree.

I suggest earning more money, and I'm afraid I won't be able to find a wife when I have money.

Which professor said that first of all, let his wife have polyandry.

Find a few men for your wife first and see if you can do it.

This professor is amazing! I wonder if I have children?

It is really not feasible for anyone to claim to be a professor or an expert to ask this questionAsk himself first! Ask him if he would like to give his wife another husband? Huang Youguang, an economist and Fudan distinguished professor, said."Consideration could be given to the institution of marriage that allows polyandryIs this really appropriate?

To put it simply, it is ridiculous that it is impossible to happen in practice, and although polygamy existed in ancient times, it has been proved that this system is still wrong, so the old ideas can no longer be continued. Not to mention the polyandry system that is being proposed now, how much social contradiction does this have to produce?

Many self-proclaimed "experts" always like to talk about opinions that go against common sense, such as Wang Chongfu, a professor of economics at Peking University, who previously said: ".The peasants are useless, they can only sweat profusely and exert great efforts, and only by completely eliminating the peasants can we achieve national prosperity and strength”；There is also a professor at Peking University, an "expert" specializing in agriculture, who said something like this: ".Burning large stoves in rural areas causes environmental pollution and kills hundreds of thousands of people every yearIt should be canceled across the board, it's simply thatNonsense

In this case, why is the overall air quality in rural areas still better than in cities?

On the contrary,There are also many women who think it is good and are complacent。Isn't it clear that the background of this sentence is based on "China's more than 30 million singles"? In short, the point of the professor is to treat women as a tool for childbearing, a solution to the problem of too many singles!

There are too many problems between monogamous people after marriage that are difficult to solve, let alone polyandry. male".Territorial awareness"StrongerThe "emotional s" problem that often occurs in daily life, it is enough to show that the contradictions caused by emotions are the most likely to make people lose their minds and commit vicious behaviors that endanger the safety of others' lives. The professor is really a public figure in vain to talk so eloquently on the basis of no investigation.

Talking about a simple but sensitive question, such as the kind of activities that need to be carried out between couples, big data shows:Under normal circumstances, twice a week, women come to menstrual leave for a week, polyandry, and after a month, it is estimated that there will be no ...... time for restTerrible!

Of course it is not feasible because it is unfair between men and women.

Feasible. Because in this way, the imbalance between men and women can be solved, and people's spending power can be greatly improved.

I don't think it's feasible. This is very detrimental to the equality of men and women, and it is also very unscientific. This is contrary to basic moral ethics.

It's impossible.

01. The concept of "polyandry" is difficult for men to accept. According to statistics, the number of male singles in our country has exceeded 30 million, I am not surprised by the figures, now it is indeed difficult for men to marry wives, the main reason is that the ratio of men and women is out of balance, but if it is said that the implementation of polygamy, I personally think it is impossible.

This will definitely make many men resist, our China has a history of 5,000 years, from the matrilineal society, basically monogamy and polyconcubinage, that is, a man can marry more than one woman, this culture has not changed until recent years, monogamy.

Monogamy, men are still acceptable, after all, it means that men and women equally respond to the slogans of the times, if soIf you are polyandry, then they will definitely not be able to accept it, this contrast is too great, and basically men will not agree.

02. Just because there are more women and men, there will be no "polyandry". Now because there are fewer women and more men, women do have the "right" to choose their partners, such as making some demands, but this effect is only that, and its influence is not enough to implement the "polyandry" system.

In ancient times, why there was monogamy and multiple concubines, it is not because there were many women in ancient times, but it was men who dominated society at that time, so to speak, and it was men who provided food, clothing, and shelter in the family.

It is equivalent to saying that this is still an era to see who creates higher value, and now although there are professional women, this ratio is far from enough, at least it must surpass men, but this situation is basically difficult to climb.

03. The root cause of many male singles. And even the current ratio of men to women is not suitable for the promotion of polyandryAccording to the data, there are almost 105 men who are now like this, and only 5 men will become singles, just this gap is not enough to implement this thing, think about polyandry, will there be a large number of female singles?After all, those with good conditions, those with money, and those with more choices (provided that men still have to accept it).

Now there are many male singles, in addition to the fact that there is a little gap between men and women, there are other reasons, although it is not monogamous and polygamous, but some women now, as far as their concept has been problematic, they think that money is king, and then commit themselves to money. There are also some women who are influenced by the idea of independent women, and some women who are not married have appeared.