The error of the metaphysical view of time and space, the metaphysical theory. Toto mistakes. For ex

To put it simply, it's out of reality!

To be is to be perceived!

Let's start with the age-old question: came first, the chicken, or the egg. The traditional way of thinking, the way to solve this problem is:

Yes is yes, and no is no, so in this world, if there is not a chicken first, there is an egg first. However, this way of thinking is in an embarrassing situation here: if there is a chicken first, then how does that chicken hatch?

Rather, in the long process of biological evolution, such a form was gradually formed. This jumps out of the circle of either/or thinking, completes a "unity of opposites", and solves this problem.

Time and space are isolated, static, one-sided, there is no relationship between the two, one does not change with the change of the other, as in Newtonian mechanics.

It seems to be the philosophy of the third year of high school, let me explain mine, materialism you can imagine as objectively existing, that is, matter determines consciousness, acknowledging the materiality of the world, but interpreting the world from an isolated, static, one-sided point of view.

The mechanical materialist view of space-time is metaphysical materialism. It acknowledges the primacy of matter, which is materialistic. But to think that everything is isolated, static, and unchanging, is mechanical or metaphysical.

Newton's philosophical ideas are basically spontaneous materialist ideas. He acknowledges the objective existence of time and space, but sees them as detached from moving matter. Although the metaphysical view of absolute space-time proposed by him can be well applied to solve the laws of motion of objects moving at macroscopic low velocity, it is powerless when it leaves the condition of macroscopic low velocity.

Newton believed that time and space exist objectively, but at the same time, he also believed that time and space are separated from moving matter and have no necessary connection with each other, and then put forward the so-called concept of absolute time and absolute space. Newton was a long-time president of the Royal Society, and he also served as a member of the British Parliament, knighting him. He died in 1727 and was buried in Westminster Abbey, a great honour.

Absolute space and absolute time.

A metaphysical materialist view of time and space.

Although it acknowledges the objectivity of space and time, it believes that space-time has nothing to do with the movement of matter, can exist independently of the movement of matter, and the specific characteristics of space-time are not affected by the movement of matter and are absolutely unchanging. The germ of a metaphysical view of absolute space-time appeared as early as ancient Greek philosophy. The ancient Greek philosopher Democritus believed that space is a "void" in which atoms move.

The concept of a "vacuum" without matter has also appeared in the history of science. These notions of space without matter also include the notion of time without matter, because "emptiness" and "vacuum" also experience the process of time passing. This view developed into the mid-16th century and was further theorized by Newton.

According to Newton, time is a pure continuity that passes absolutely uniformly, independent of the movement of matter; Space is the frame of absolute emptiness detached from matter, which can be filled with matter, but it itself is never changing.

Newton called his understanding of time and space "absolute time" and "absolute space". This metaphysical view of absolute time and space once dominated the history of human cognition until the beginning of the twentieth century. Modern natural science has proved that there is no absolute "void", and the "vacuum" in physics is not really empty, but there are special substances such as gravitational fields and electromagnetic fields.

In particular, the recognition of non-Euclidean geometry and the establishment of the theory of relativity profoundly revealed the dependence of the properties of time and space on the motion of matter, and the absolute view of time and space was denied as a mistake. Dialectical materialism holds that all material movements always have to go through time and occupy space, which is absolute and unchanging; However, the spatio-temporal characteristics of each concrete thing are relative and changeable, and it is determined and restricted by the characteristics of the movement of specific things. Insisting on the view that space-time and the movement of matter are inseparable not only overcomes the metaphysical view of space-time, but also enables materialism to carry out the problem of space-time to the end.

The absolute view of space-time holds that the measurement of time and space has nothing to do with the state of motion of the inertial frame of reference, and that the kinematics (e.g., coordinates, velocity) observed by the same object in different inertial frames of reference can be related to each other through the Galilean transformation. This is the principle of relativity of mechanics: all laws of mechanics are immutable under Galilean transformations.

In other words, time and space are relatively independent and unrelated to each other, which is absolute. Modern science, on the other hand, believes that time and space are interrelated and constrained. Therefore, the error of the absolute view of time and space lies in the inconsistency of the inertial frame of reference when considering the state of motion, which causes time and space to have their own inertial frame of reference, that is, to recognize the variability of time and space.

By "simultaneous" we usually mean absolute simultaneous, which is the result of assuming that the signal is measured to infinity, or that it is at a distance from two events, and the signal travels the same time. Relative simultaneity, which is related to the measurement speed and position, is subjective simultaneity, not objective simultaneity. For example:

The person in the middle of AB hears AB at the same time, and the person close to A hears ** at A first, and then hears ** at B, and the result he hears is not at the same point in time, it is at different times.

At the beginning of the expansion of the universe, space-time can have curvature, and time can be distorted by gravity, with space-time tunnels, so space-time is variable. The absolute view of space-time holds that space-time is absolute, has nothing to do with matter, and is unchanging.

Newton's view of space-time is absolute.

Its worldview is mechanical.

The absolute view of space-time uses the Galilean transformation.

A to C velocity is U

The speed of b to c is -u

Then the rate of A to B is 2U

The mechanistic worldview sees the world as a linear system.

Just give an initial value that is precise enough.

Based on this, you can calculate what will happen next.

Corresponds to the isolate and static worldview typical of philosophy.

The concept of space-time in the theory of relativity obeys the principle of relativity.

The results obtained under the above conditions depend on the velocity u

The specific calculations are performed according to the Lorentz transform.

There is a phenomenon of shrinkage and time dilation.

Thought Experiment: The speed of light does not change in any frame of reference.

PS: Attention.

This man: Albert Einstein, the founder.

Probation period. The first-level argument is false.

Newton's view of space-time can be applied to both inertial and non-inertial frames.

Could it be on an object that is moving at an accelerated pace.

Is Newton's law invalid?

The inertial force is just a technique that was introduced later to facilitate the handling of non-inertial frame problems, and it is not a theory at all.

The same is true of the theory of relativity.

The calculation of relativity in both inertial and non-inertial frames has to be considered and different effects are used in different calculation methods.

However, the relative view of space-time in the theory of relativity itself does not say that it does not hold up in the Fei inertia system, and even this most basic concept is not clear.

Please don't speak casually and mislead!!

Science is rigorous and serious!!

Newton's and Einstein's view of time and space, one claims absolute and the other claims relative, who is right?

D Question Analysis: The classical view of space-time believes that time and space exist independently of the movement of objects and hailstones, while the relativistic view of space-time believes that the collapse of time and space is related to the object and its motion, so A is correct and B is correct; Classical mechanics is only applicable to macroscopic objects, low-speed motion problems, not to high-speed motion (relative to the speed of light), so c is correct; When the speed of motion of an object is much less than the speed of light, the conclusion of relativity and classical mechanics is not much different, so classical mechanics is applicable, so d is wrong; If you choose the wrong question for this question, you should choose: d