Yu Minhong and college students were criticized for saying that money is proof of ability , what do

It's not the first time that Yu Minhong has said the wrong thing, and I don't think it will be the last, this is to cause controversy and make it a little hot? Or is it low emotional intelligence and has no intention of leaking out? Yu Minhong is also a celebrity, a public figure, and he is from an educational background, which is different from those copycat stars.

Some people take his history of struggle as an inspirational story, as a role model, so what he says in public has a certain influence, and because of this, he should be cautious in his words and deeds, so as not to cause a bad impact on his words. <>

In a public speech last year, Yu Minhong said that "the criterion for Chinese women to choose men is that men can make money, and it doesn't matter whether their conscience is good or not, so the degeneration of Chinese women has led to the degeneration of the country." As soon as this remark came out, one stone stirred up a thousand waves and aroused condemnation from netizens. Although these remarks represent the thoughts and ideas of some people, it is fine if they complain in private, and if they are ordinary people, it is nothing, at most they will be angrily reprimanded.

Yu Minhong seems to have forgotten his identity as a "celebrity", ignoring the impact of his remarks, "If you want to wear the crown, bear its weight first", since you are a public figure, you naturally can't say it, even if you think so, you can't express it in public. Of course, Yu Minhong also apologized to the women comrades across the country, thinking that he would grow wiser after eating a trench, but he didn't want Mr. Yu to throw out the high theory that "money is proof of ability", and even the people couldn't stand it. <>

Money is a proof of personal ability, and when your salary is half less than that of your classmates, half of your life has been wasted", Yu Minhong fired another shot! Again, such a view represents the thoughts of some people, maybe Mr. Yu Minhong thinks so, but you are a public figure, and your words will affect many people, and this kind of concept that is obviously inconsistent with the mainstream view of society is better to say less. The common people can say that Mr. Yu can say it in private, but he can't say it when he is speaking!

Can money represent ability? At least not exactly! Look at the laureates of the Order of the Republic of our country, there are scientists, there are scholars, there are veterans, there are cadres, do they have money?

I don't think compared to these rich people. But are they incapable? Who can compare their contribution to the country?

In addition to money, there are many things that can explain ability, and this is a matter of everyone's values.

Conclusion: Compared with these rich tycoons, I admire those old people who have won the "Order of the Republic", they are the backbone of the nation, and their ability cannot be measured by money. The country can do without Yu Minhong, but it can't do without them!

I think that's right. The salary of students entering the workplace is high and low, and the size of the work ability is an important indicator to measure the level of salary.

I think Yu Hongmin is right, it is difficult to move an inch in society without money, and only with money can you achieve everything you want.

First of all, I think this sentence has a certain truth, "money is the proof of ability," first of all, it reflects that an ability is the ability to make money, if you don't have the ability to make money, then where do you get the money?

This quote is the greatest insult to those who are willing to give. Because there are many bigwigs who dedicate themselves to scientific research, the money is not high, because they are all invested in research.

When they gain economic freedom, but they can live comfortably on the capital itself. When they lie down and can cut leeks, they can drink tea naturally. They can stand on the banks of a dry river and brag about themselves.

What can they say about poetry and distance, what lies on the beach to bask in the sun, what money is time. Yu Minhong claims to be an educator, but under the guise of education, he openly undermines the values of young people who are not yet fully developed, sells anxiety, equates life with money, intends to confuse young people, and promotes the Bible of New Oriental training.

After the reform and opening up, there are indeed people who associate time and money, and this is not wrong. We should make full use of time, improve production efficiency, liberate and develop productive forces, create wealth, and pursue a happy life for everyone. But when do we see "money" as "life"?

When can we boast that if we don't make money, we're going to waste our lives?

Your life depends on you. Everyone can have a different life. It doesn't have to be money.

Capitalists want to combine your spending power with who you are, your earning power with the meaning of your life. In fact, the expansion and reproduction of capital is a logic. The products produced need to be in demand, and they should be profitable.

At first, the capitalists just did these things in silence. Now, since the doctrine of brotherhood and the doctrine of good fortune, the capitalists are increasingly eager to gain a voice. Now they have become bayonets on the ground of values.

I think there is truth to it, but this sentence will have a certain negative impact on people.

Yu Minhong said yes, money is the proof of the current social ability. He said one less thing, money is also one of the main reasons for the degeneration of society today.

I think there is still some truth, if there is the ability to make money, then it means that this person is still quite good in all aspects.

The bitter criticism is right, not everyone puts money first, like the great revolutionary, the proletariat, whether there is money or not is related to many factors, such as the family where he was born, what kind of relatives and friends, the era he has caught up, whether he values money or not, and so on.

It makes so much sense. Live in the moment. No money is better than a dog. Money is needed in every way. You can have everything, but you can't borrow poor. I don't know until I'm poor.

I think it makes sense, he's a proof of ability, isn't it?

Ability does not necessarily have to be reflected in earning money, but being able to earn money means that it must be capable.

Absolutely! It's just that one premise has to be set: don't discuss where the money is going.

With this condition, this sentence is undoubtedly correct. Because in different contexts, money can only be earned by different methods and means. The means used are the embodiment of ability, and if moral standards are added, it will not be the result, because there is a saying that a gentleman loves money and takes it in a good way.

A gentleman's talents cannot be brought into play in an environment that lacks morality, and a gentleman also despises money at this time. There is also a saying in the Analects: There is no way in the state, and the rich are noble and shameful.

In a social environment that lacks morality, if you want to make a fortune, "Thick Black Studies" is the best guide.

"Money is proof of ability" is not true! The key is money