The turnover rate of teachers in some township schools is as high as 45, and it is difficult for out

The iron-clad battalions are flowing soldiers, but the "flowing water" of township schools is too fast and too frequent. It is normal for units to transfer personnel, but if the transfers are too frequent and the area is too large, it will certainly affect the work, stability, and development of the unit. In a township school, the teacher turnover rate is as high as 45% in five years, and half of the teachers have changed, which is really not a good thing for education.

However, this kind of thing is not news in the countryside, but a relatively common phenomenon. <>

I am the principal of a village-level primary school, and I have been transferred to this school to serve as the principal for five years, and now I am the veteran of this school, and none of the other ten teachers has been here for more than five years. In the past five years, I have been accustomed to being transferred in and out, almost every semester is a big change, and the sign-in sheet and class schedule of each semester need to be re-arranged, and even several times in a semester, because there are still people who are transferred out during the semester.

Teachers change too often, which directly affects students' grades, and students don't have time to establish a relationship with a teacher, so they change to a new teacher. And the new teacher was transferred away before he could remember the names of the children in the class, so that the students and teachers were always running in, and the grades naturally could not go up.

Why has the township become a springboard for many teachers? At present, the treatment of teachers in townships and towns has been improved a lot, and many places have also implemented a subsidy policy for teachers in remote mountainous areas, with a corresponding monthly subsidy of 200 to 500 yuan according to the degree of remoteness, and Jiangxi Province has made up 6,000 yuan a year for teachers in the most remote mountainous areas. This policy has eased the pressure of teacher mobility to a certain extent, but it has not fundamentally solved the problem.

In the past two years, the education authorities have seriously dealt with the phenomenon of in-service supplementary classes in urban areas. But there is no phenomenon of in-service teachers making up classes, but it is turned underground, more hidden, a class is less than fifty or sixty people, more than seventy or eighty people, more than half of them participate in make-up classes, 400 students a month, so calculated, the income is much higher than what remote subsidies, how not to make rural teachers envious? So the rural teachers tried to transfer to the urban areas.

Secondly, the loss of high-quality students has also led to a decrease in the sense of achievement and gain of rural teachers. There are more than a dozen or even three or four students in a class, and the classroom atmosphere is difficult to mobilize, and many young teachers feel that the value of their lives cannot be maximized, so they will be transferred after a year or two.

Again, the living conditions in the countryside are indeed very difficult, and most of the teachers assigned now are oriented normal students, in their twenties, all of whom are post-90s, and even post-00s, who are the pearls of their parents at home, and drive to the countryside, seeing that the conditions are so difficult, there is no separate bathroom, no bathroom, and even the dormitory is a classroom transformation, many girls quit their jobs on the spot, and some have survived for a semester or two, and they really can't stand it, and they also resign. Those who stayed were also tested by one mind.

Conclusion: The reason why rural teachers have this phenomenon is not only the problem of treatment, but also the problem of teachers' value, sense of achievement and sense of gain.

The turnover rate of teachers in a township school is 45%, and the outstanding teachers in the countryside are difficult to continue, which is directly reflected in the problem of the loss of excellent township teachers, and the reason for the loss of teachers in township schools, there are certain reasons, in order to avoid the increase in the loss rate, it is necessary to find a way to retain the outstanding teachers in the countryside.

1. Reasons for the loss of excellent teachers in rural areas1. Low salary income

The main reason for the loss of many outstanding rural teachers is because of the low level of salary income, many excellent rural teachers have been in the front-line positions for many years, but the salary income level has risen slowly, and the salary received a month is only two or three thousand, which can only meet the basic needs of life.

2. Personal development planning

Another reason for the loss of many outstanding rural teachers is that excellent rural teachers have their own life development plans, for example, some rural teachers do not plan to engage in the job of teaching all their lives, they have a clear personal development plan, and after completing a certain number of teaching years, they choose to develop in other fields.

3. It is difficult to promote professional titles

Another reason for the loss of many outstanding teachers in rural areas is that the road to promotion is not easy, many outstanding teachers in rural areas have worked for several years, but it has been difficult to rise to high professional titles, which also discourages the enthusiasm of many outstanding teachers in rural areas, so that they finally choose to leave their teaching posts.

2. How can we reduce the turnover rate of excellent teachers in rural areas? 1. Improve the salary of rural teachers and increase their income level

To avoid the problem of the loss of excellent rural teachers and reduce the turnover rate, the most fundamental way is to improve the salary of rural teachers and increase their income level.

Improving the income level of rural teachers will also help improve the social status of rural teachers, so that they can be more recognized and respected, and the income level will be improved, and more outstanding talents will be attracted to join the team of rural teachers.

Some normal universities in our country have recruited publicly-funded normal students, and publicly-funded normal students can be free of tuition, but after graduation, they need to be designated to teach in fixed primary and secondary schools, and must complete the required teaching years, normal universities can continue to improve the enrollment policy of publicly-funded normal students, expand the number of enrollment places, and can supplement certain talents for the team of rural teachers, and to a certain extent, it can alleviate the problem of insufficient talents in the rural teacher team, and colleges and universities can also encourage graduates to teach in rural areas. The state should also give certain economic subsidies to college graduates who have completed a certain number of years of teaching.

I am an "education craftsman", answering interesting and informative questions attentively, if it helps you, welcome to click to follow!

The child of a friend in the countryside of my hometown is in the first grade this year, but the school has not hired a math teacher, which means that there is no math teacher to teach

From this point, it is not difficult for us to analyze that it is a fact that the people say that "the turnover rate of teachers in townships and towns is very high", especially in some poor areas, so if this continues, it will cause great unfairness in education.

The background of the problem, but there is no way, because the economic standard of living in the township is low, so the economic pressure that needs to be borne is greater than that of the position of teacher. <>

The man went to the heights, and the oxen went to the grass

This sentence is indeed more thorough, teachers are not immortals who don't eat fireworks, they have parents and children, and they are also like you with a lot of financial pressure. So if they want to improve their current life, they must have a better platform, so many teachers in townships and towns will actively prepare for the exam and teach in the city.

If this problem is not addressed amicably in the coming years, the distribution of educational resources will be extremely unfair for urban and rural areas.

I didn't solve the problem when it happened, it wasn't just a verbal appeal, so how do I deal with it? <>

Problem analysisFirst of all, I think we should improve the treatment of rural teachers, at least let them know that there is no need to worry about their own lives excessively, if this is not possible, how can a teacher be relieved to teach on the podium?

The second is the issue of the assessment system, and they should have more opportunities to teach at the grassroots level. This opportunity is the problem of the current education system, which should have the same starting point as teachers in the city. <>

It does not mean that when a certain work is to be carried out in the future, teachers must be required to have teaching experience in key high schools.

If this point is put on the township is body, this is obviously impossible, now it is necessary to enter the city, so the township teachers in order for them to have a better way out in the future, it is precisely because of the existence of such a problem that the loss rate of rural teacher resources is very large.

I think this needs to appropriately improve the treatment of teachers in township schools, and also needs the respect and support of the whole society for teachers in township schools.

In fact, this phenomenon is inseparable from the hollowing out of the countryside. Because young parents now choose to take their children with them and go out to work, the number of students in the countryside is relatively reduced. What's more, there are also town schools poaching people.

This is a manifestation of the uneven distribution of educational resources, and also reflects the difference in the treatment of urban and rural teachers, which leads to the inability of rural schools to retain people, and the relevant departments should improve the treatment and welfare of rural teachers.

What's so strange about it? People go to the good, and the water flows low. Since they cannot be given the treatment they deserve, they should abolish the village schools.

There are many people who want to be teachers, and it is better to give up their positions to those who are willing and capable.

We are a rural middle school with 61 establishments and 42 students in the actual class. The average age is 40 years.

Xuecheng District, Zaozhuang City, deducted the teacher's salary, pressed for a month, and then paid it, right?

It's not as much as the takeaway brother.

I think this is an inevitable stage of social development, because everyone wants to live a good life, and the countryside is not a place where good development can occur.

This is a very bad sign. Rural schools should find ways to retain these excellent teachers, for example, by improving their salaries.

I think this is a shortcoming of China's current education system, the salary income of township teachers is too far from that of urban teachers, and the state should improve the treatment of township teachers in order to better retain them.

Who said that the salary of urban teachers is higher than that of rural teachers, and urban teachers do not have the living allowance of rural teachers. Is it a few hundred yuan less per month than a rural teacher?

Rural teachers have a worse income than urban teachers, so most teachers have to go to success, why should they stay in the countryside?

The salaries of excellent teachers in the countryside are too low and the pressure is huge, and they are worse than in the cities.

The income of township teachers is not low, but they deal with farmers every day, and they have no future, and there are not many social resources, so young people with some ability and resources are not willing to stick to it for a long time.

A friend of mine, a teacher friend, also resigned, and he didn't care about supporting his family with a salary of more than 3,000 for 20 years, and now he still lives in a rented house.

We should learn from Ma Yun's way and give rural teachers a high salary and income every year, each teacher starts from 300,000 per Chinese New Year's Eve, only in this way can rural teachers work and fulfill their responsibilities with peace of mind, now that society is not in the past, low income will only reduce people's fighting spirit and poverty.

The essential reason is that there are no students in the township, how can there be a few students in each class, and more than a dozen students? The second is that the salary is high, and it is not respected, how to keep people.

No matter how you say it, it's air conditioning, and the comparison between the countryside and the city must be doubled, otherwise it's all nonsense.

The phenomenon of rural schools is the inevitable result of urbanization, and improving the remuneration of rural teachers is not the fundamental solution to the problem, but narrowing the gap between urban and rural areas is the right way.

The Internet has not been spraying teachers with high salaries, light work, red envelopes, and ...... running classesNow the trolls are satisfied!

It's easy to solve, you don't need to take the teacher qualification certificate, you can recruit people directly, and anyone can use one plus one to teach.

To ask me what I think, I said I was too lazy to look.

There is a choice, who wants to travel hundreds of kilometers every weekend.

Not only is the salary low, but the students are really difficult to teach, basically left-behind children, regardless of the intergenerational belt, developed a very bad habit, who teaches who has a headache, parents do not cooperate at all, and if they are not good, they will be complained, who wants to do it?

If the good ones in an industry want to stay, and the bad ones flow out, then the industry is a good industry, and on the contrary, there are many problems.

It is an exaggeration to say that there is a "shortage of teachers", because the shortage of teachers is not a common phenomenon, but a phenomenon in a local area, which of course is a remote village with underdeveloped economy. The "teacher shortage" in these schools is already very serious, and only the principal of a rural school has 10 teachers, and the rest are temporary teachers, which is unimaginable, but it is real. Not long ago, Guangxi recruited teachers, and no one applied for more than 2,000 positions!

On the contrary, in some economically developed areas, teacher recruitment is as hot as civil servants, such as Suzhou City in Jiangsu Province, where even rural schools recruit teachers, the competition is quite fierce, not only "short" but also quite hot. This is in stark contrast to Guangxi's recruitment of no one cares, showing Qinsun pants. Some people say that there is no shortage of teachers, but this is lying with an open eye, and in some villages, it is very serious.

But in economically developed areas and large and medium-sized cities, it really does not exist.

In some rural schools, young people cannot be retained, because the conditions are difficult and the salary is low, how can they be retained? Male teachers can't afford to marry wives, so female teachers try to transfer them away. What about the backbone teachers?

When people go to higher places, backbone teachers have relatively strong professional ability, and it is easy to find a position with a higher salary and more suitable for themselves, and it is easier to change jobs.

Take Jiangsu as an example, the teachers in southern Jiangsu are highly paid and the school conditions are good, while relatively speaking, the northern Jiangsu region is much worse. The competition for recruitment in southern Jiangsu is very fierce, and the northern region of Jiangsu can be said to be very easy. Some outstanding teachers in northern Jiangsu, after creating their own brands, many directly jumped to southern Jiangsu.

The author has four or five colleagues, all of whom went to Suzhou, Nanjing and other places in southern Jiangsu.

How to solve the problem of the shortage of teachers in rural schools in economically underdeveloped areas is actually very simple and rude. For example, as in Ningxia, subsidies are increased for rural teachers, and for rural teachers, they are promoted to intermediate and senior teachers according to the number of years they have been engaged in teaching work for a certain number of years, and there is no threshold or post restrictions.

The shortage of teachers seems to be caused by the economy, but in fact it is artificially created, and it is not enough attention to rural education and rural teachers. For example, the teacher who recently dealt with corporal punishment of students in the Taihe Education Bureau turned out to be "transferred to teach in rural areas". Under the guidance of such thinking, young teachers cannot be retained, backbone teachers fly away, and rural school teachers are in short supply.

Leave this problem to the professionals. Friend, do you think there's a better way?

Text: Contemporary teachers say; Figure: Network).