Those who are unwilling to lead are really without a future?

I wonder if you're really an introvert? Or - because of the arrogance in his bones, he can't lead with him, which leads to a seemingly introverted appearance. There is a fundamental difference between these two things.

However, no matter which one you belong to, there is nothing wrong with it, and it is not a fatal flaw. What about introversions? Nowadays, social science research shows that introverts have advantages and characteristics that extroverts cannot have.

If you belong to the latter, because you are arrogant, you can't do it to your superiors, it means that you are a person with strong discipline and temperament, or you have a certain ambition, and you are not happy that someone controls and arranges you. It's normal.

Introverted personality, working in the state-owned enterprise system, really suffers. Character determines fate, what kind of personality is suitable for what kind of work. If you don't want to break away from state-owned enterprises for most of the future, change yourself a little.

If you can't do it (the nature of the country is easy to change), it doesn't matter, find other jobs that are suitable for introverts, try it, and you will find something different.

This problem should be divided into two sides, although those who can talk about it are more satisfactory in state-owned enterprises. This does not mean that people who do not know how to stammer will be unsatisfactory in state-owned enterprises. It also depends on the leader.

In fact, on the whole, working in a state-owned enterprise. Do what you have to do. You don't have to bother anyone.

But you have to understand what you need to know. As long as you don't deliberately offend others, it's not much of a problem. Do your own thing and keep your mouth shut.

Be cautious in what you say and do. You certainly won't mix badly in a business.

I don't like to tie up with the leader, but also expect the leader's appreciation, which is a sign of low emotional intelligence. I don't like to tie up with leaders, because I don't like to tie up with anyone, and living my life the way I like is a sign of high emotional intelligence. Mental kneeling and licking, physical kneeling and licking, not pitiful, because it can be beneficial.

Mentally arrogant, physically arrogant, not pitiful, because they are comfortable. It's pitiful to be caught in the middle, and if knowledge and action are not united, it is low emotional intelligence. Learning to communicate appropriately with leaders is a necessary condition for success, either stammering or normal communication.

Yes. Because the workplace is cruel and very competitive, if you have a sweet mouth to lead, your opportunity for promotion and salary increase is just around the corner, and arrogant and lonely people will naturally not be reused.

This can not be generalized, some people themselves have excellent skills, even if they do not tie up the leader, they can also rely on their own efforts to fight out their own side of the world. So it depends.

In fact, this is not the case, some people are naturally arrogant, they are unwilling to slap others, and this kind of people often rely on their own strength to achieve their own future.

I can't say absolutely, but most of them are, this society is like this, and it's very helpless.

Yes, they don't know how to deal with people, they don't handle things thoughtfully, and it's hard for people to see only technology, and even if they do, it's a very few.

First of all, I have to tell you about the "official hat knowledge": the leader has an official hat and wants to wear it on the head of a capable subordinate, but this subordinate is far away from the leader and the leader can't reach it, so he puts it on the head of the person closest to him.

You, the poor, capable man, do you understand? I myself have been a manager for more than ten years, I can be regarded as the leader you say, and I am also familiar with the knowledge of official hats, so I will show up and give you a little inspiration.

First of all, make it clear that if you don't interact with the leader much, the chance of promotion is really not great. Here's why:

First, the ability you mentioned is strong, but the current position is presented.

You think you are very capable, and you have proved that you are good with your performance. But you forget, you haven't been promoted to a position that you haven't done, so how can you prove your ability?

For example, you are now a junior staff member, and the company needs to promote a supervisor, and you performed very well when you were a junior executive, but does that alone prove that you are capable enough to be a good supervisor? You know, what you need more to be a supervisor is team management skills.

Be responsible for overall performance.

2. Don't deal with the leader, the leader doesn't understand you.

Promoting to a higher position, past performance, is only a consideration, leaders also need to consider the potential of management ability, this potential is not quantified, it needs to be observed and accumulated on a regular basis. And you don't interact with the leader, the leader doesn't know you, and of course he doesn't know if you have the potential to be qualified for the future position, and he can't compare you with other candidates. You may think that you are better than everyone else, but that is only your own judgment.

3. Don't associate with the leader, the leader is not sure whether you are suitable for his management style.

Trust is based on knowing your character and abilities. When a leader promotes a subordinate, he definitely needs a person with strong obedience ability and high execution ability. If you don't interact with the leader, you may not know his management ideas, and the leader is certainly not sure whether you will obey his instructions, and no leader will promote someone who works with him.

Actually, you're not sure if you can adapt to his management style, because you don't really know him.

Fourth, what you say about strong ability may be self-talking and self-drawing.

Ideas without feedback can be wishful thinking. Because you don't interact with the leader, of course you won't get feedback from the leader that you are capable, who said that you are capable? It may be a colleague, but does the colleague have a say in your promotion?

Of course, there are also many companies that implement competitive promotion, and our company is, the on-site scoring is announced on the spot, which is very bright and fair. However, but, it is also necessary to have a pre-appointment talk, comprehensive evaluation, and then appointment.

In short, if you want to improve in the workplace, get closer to the leader, there is no harm at all, even if you are not promoted for promotion, it is rare to get the opportunity to learn management, after all, what you lack is management, he is good at management.

Such people have the hope of promotion. The current workplace environment is still very good, and promotion is linked to work ability, not that you can be promoted if you are a leader.

I'm very direct to him, a person has the ability to work, but he doesn't have much contact with the leader, there is a high probability that he will not promote you, but he will use you to death, anyway, you have a strong ability to work, so you don't have to use it in vain. It's a bit cruel, but most of the time.

In fact, this is a lack of ability, don't deny it! A lot of people like to say that they don't get promoted because "I don't like to pat my boss's ass, I don't want to build relationships!" "Never think of yourself!

This kind of person, when he or she gets promoted because he or she is too close to the boss, will say behind his back: "That person is promoted because he or she is a sycophant and too close to the boss. I just can't keep doing this!

Is it true that approaching the leader means slapping the leader's ass? Is it a sycophant? It's a completely confusing concept, just an excuse for yourself that you can't find the ability!

And ugly people always like to say: "What's the use of a handsome guy, you can't eat it as a meal"!

People with low education always like to say: "What is the use of high education, ability is more important!" ”！

Such a person, it is not that there is no future, if it is just work, it is even more difficult, unless there is a powerful technology! But if it is your own business, it is equally difficult, and entrepreneurship needs to walk with others! In any case, now, there is more than one way to develop the future, but there are some things that we must improve.

In fact, even relatives, not to mention leaders, can become less intimate if they don't move for a long time.

This is the truth that "a neighbor is better than a distant relative". In fact, as long as "I don't like to please the leader and don't want to be emotional" as an excuse to cover up the fact that I have not been promoted, basically the purpose of this kind of person's work in daily life is too utilitarian and even a little selfish! Perhaps only when their own vital interests are affected will they want to find a leader, and in normal times, they may not take the leader seriously.

Even think that when the work is done, you have to rely on your own ability, and you don't care about the help behind the leader, and you are not grateful. So, whether it's in the workplace or relatives, it's the same! The relationship of moving every day does not mean flattery, flattery!

There is a kind of person who is like this, he is selfish, but on the contrary, others are flattering and flattering! The point is that this statement is incorrect and there is an element of fiction. Normal people walk, it is a must, and relatives, without any contact with each other, get together, it's just normal communication between friends, play mahjong, drink together, enhance feelings!

Instead of not contacting others like these people, think about other people's affairs! So why would anyone want to talk to you? In addition, the idea is dark, always with malice to guess the actions of others, and also likes to say sarcastic things!

Herd effect: Don't please him, I have become an alternative, of course, contrary to the elite team, and then it is easy to be isolated and not please the leader, then you are an alternative, and then in the integration into the team will be extremely uncomfortable, and then have to change their behavior, follow to please, so that the team members accept themselves, people are social ** and affirmation needs. In order to please the leader, in order to make it easy and very leader's work, you can get a good income and more opportunities to be promoted, graded and raised, etc., but you also have to invest some "give up":

Only follow the arrangement, make the leader happy, and give gifts or money in private.

To please the leader is to tilt resources for yourself, so that you give priority to choosing the first job, there are many opportunities to grasp well, this will have more opportunities to excel in the ear of locust, take the so-called shortcut. The above is more common flattering effect, so this does not do to obtain, lies in your self-efficacy, and whether you guess whether friends are willing to take out and give up to exchange, cover their true values to obey, adapt to the new environment, today's society is a sinister person, which type of leading cadres are there, but pay attention to the selection of their own style of leading cadres, if you have been in the internal structure of the system, only let yourself to adapt, because private enterprises are not like enterprises, there are so many choices.

There is a kind of leader called no need to please, rest assured to get things done, and also need to find ways to help you get things done. There is a kind of leader, you wrap him for dinner, he will have a variety of different reasons to find a reason to push you, you give him a gift or bring something to eat, he considers the preciousness and lightness of the gift to determine whether it needs to be accepted: lighter can, more than 50 yuan below the most basic polite decline.

If he focuses on doing things well and drawing conclusions about relationships and affairs, he has the following work habits.

Not only will you observe your own level and growth potential, but also continue to observe your values, evaluate whether your values are in line with the team, improve and guide you correctly, so that you can correct your behavior and help yourself integrate into the team. In terms of evaluating your personal ability, not only do you see the present, but also let you make a feedback form: where you have been improving, how far is it from the estimated progress of the task, where can you improve and alleviate, apply for a training plan or help apply for training resources, etc.

Tell what is good for a person's estimate, let you set your own performance appraisal, and evaluate whether it is feasible with the leader, let you network resources, put a certain amount of power to let you do it alone, and report the work on time, the evaluation of a person is according to high requirements, so that you can develop more independent, efficient and powerful.

Not exactly, pleasing the leader will make the leader remember you and give you a chance, and some people do like to be flattered, accept gifts from employees and so on.

I think this kind of person is not without development, as long as he has a certain professional ability, he can also develop very well. Many people feel that in the Hashima workplace, if they can learn to talk about pure leadership and positive associations, they will have a very good development prospect. In fact, this is not the case, because for some people who have the overall strength at work, even if they do not have to lead and walk to associate with them, they can still let themselves shine in the workplace.

Therefore, people who have development prospects in the workplace are not necessarily people who like to lead and walk together.

They have all become successful people who start their own businesses, because they don't approve of this practice of leading by tying up leaders, so they become leaders themselves.

In the end, they were appreciated elsewhere and showed their value, because gold always shines, and they need to prove themselves with strength, not to lead.

Those who don't like to lead are all flat in the end. There will be no outstanding results. Being diligent at work doesn't do much good.

can only become a person who works, without them when the leader promotes people, and without them when the salary is raised, they will completely become a small transparent.

Such people will still have a future. Because even if this kind of person doesn't like to be a leader and is unwilling to take the initiative, as long as he can make himself have a certain working strength.

Many people think that if they have good eloquence in the workplace and are willing to move around, they will definitely be able to have a better future. At the same time, they will think that people who don't like to lead and don't want to move around have no future in the workplace. <>

Such people will still have a future.

But I personally feel that this statement is wrong. Because I think even people who don't like to tie up with leaders and don't want to move around relationships. As long as you have a certain strength in the workplace, and you can have a relatively large value in your own job.

In this case, it will still have a better taste. Because as long as you have relative work strength, you will definitely be able to be appreciated by your leaders and bosses. So as to be able to have a better development space in the market.

There are a lot of people who don't like to be leaders.

And judging from the current situation, in fact, most people don't like to tie up leaders. Because this part of the people feel that the leader is too hypocritical, and it will also make the leader feel that he has no work strength in the process of work. Therefore, this part of the people not only does not like to lead, but also thinks that some people who like to lead are too hypocritical.

And in the process of carrying out work, I will also keep a certain distance from these people. <>

Approach work with the right attitude.

Finally, I would like to say that each of us should keep ourselves in the right position in the process of carrying out our work. And let yourself have a better attitude in the process of work. Because only by working in this situation can you feel that the content of the work will be easier.

At the same time, I can also get the appreciation of my colleagues in the process of work, so that I can maintain a good relationship with my colleagues.