Why is justice always late, and why is justice late?

First of all, your point of view is not very correct, and then I will analyze why you have this point of view.

Because the vast majority of people are in a situation of fairness and justice, unfair treatment will be infinitely magnified, and everyone is willing to watch and report. I believe that the vast majority of people have a fair and efficient system around them, but if there is a fish that slips through the net, everyone will pass on ten, ten to hundred. Don't generalize.

If justice was always late, society would have been in turmoil, and I don't believe in the free United States, that landscape.

Because it takes time to research. Justice often needs to be carefully examined, so it can't be done right away.

Hehe, this society is too realistic, and there are not many people who dare to tell the truth. The people who stand up are true heroes. Most of the time, people are watching from the sidelines.

I will answer why justice is always late, because justice is the most realized and the most reliable.

Do you want to live a 1984-style life, do you want to live a minority report-style life? That kind of society is extremely terrifying.

If you don't want to, then justice must be late, because the damage has already happened, and all we can do is shorten the time of lateness.

That will allow you to experience His justice and make you more grateful to Him.

Late justice is justice.

Jurist Chen Ruihua in "Visible Justice".

from the judicial process.

reflected on "justice delayed". In his view, "delayed justice is injustice not because the substantive conclusion is wrong or caused by substantive injustice, but because the substantive conclusion is delayed and the procedural process is unfair".

"Delayed justice" is also the pursuit of substantive justice, so it does not mean that delayed justice is not needed, but the injustice it causes in terms of procedure is thought-provoking.

Note. As the basic value of the human legal system, justice generally has two manifestations, namely substantive justice and procedural justice.

Substantive justice is mainly embodied in substantive law, implemented in the conclusion of judicial adjudication, and constitutes a kind of substantive moral restriction on judges.

From a static point of view, substantive justice has a clear set of value criteria. The legal principles put forward by criminal law scholars, such as the legalization of crimes, the proportionality of crimes and punishments, and the equal treatment of similar cases, can generally be regarded as the main content of substantive justice.

Justice delayed is not justice, justice delayed is injustice.

One might argue that justice that is delayed is also justice, but that justice is only one step late. In fact, belated justice is not just because the substantive conclusion is wrong or caused by substantive injustice, but because the substantive conclusion is delayed and the procedural process is unfair.

This delay in justice undermines the timeliness of the administration of justice.

First, look at the consequences of slowness.

Generally speaking, the delay in the formation of adjudication conclusions will lead to an arbitrary extension of the case closure cycle, a large amount of evidence related to the case may be lost, and witnesses who know the facts of the case may have blurred or lost their memory, or even die. Even those "public prosecutors" who were directly responsible for handling cases "back then".

They will also be unable to provide some of the necessary clues about the case due to the passage of time. As a result, the truth of the case becomes more and more difficult to ascertain over time, and the chance of an erroneous verdict increases. It can be seen that the sluggishness and inefficiency of the adjudication process may not lead to a fair adjudication conclusion.

Taking a step back, even if a belated decision is still a just conclusion, the parties involved are directly harmed by the belation of such a conclusion.

No.

Justice delayed is injustice. Believe that justice should be time-sensitive.

Because life is finite. Rehabilitated after death, justice at this time means nothing to the deceased. Such justice is not worthy of being called justice, and the dead cannot hear it. At best, it can only be regarded as a consolation to the family of the deceased.

Introduction

First, from the point of view of natural philosophy, the so-called principle of universal justice is customarily taken as a proposition of natural philosophy, that is, all things or all beings arise and return to their place. When all things in the universe are born and die, life and death, it is the first principle (or universal justice) that plays a dominant or dominant role behind the diversity of all things. All things are produced from it and will return to it, according to necessity; For according to the procedure of time, they will be punished and judged for them.

Secondly, from political philosophy.

From this point of view, this principle indicates that the more fully the individual (individual) realizes the universal necessity in his own existence, and the more accurately he adheres to the sphere of existence prescribed by the whole, the more the fate of the individual will be changed by it. And in the discourse of the necessity of the world (the law of justice) and the existence of the individual, implicit is the question of what is crucial to the emerging order of the state: how the real individual treats the norms, laws, and traditional laws of the state of universal validity.

There are many reasons why justice may be late, including but not limited to the following:

1.Design and implementation of systems or laws. Justice may not be achieved in a timely manner if there are no clear checks or restrictions on certain injustices in a society's institutions or laws, or if there are loopholes or difficulties in the implementation of the law.

2.Social or group cognitive biases. People may have preconceived prejudices or misconceptions about certain social groups or events, which may lead to the failure of justice to be fairly assessed and served.

3.Abuse of power and corruption. If power is abused or corrupted, justice can be hindered because it distorts or undermines fair and just rules and procedures.

4.Socio-economic inequality. Socio-economic inequalities can lead to inequitable distribution of resources, preventing some people from receiving adequate legal aid or other just support, thus affecting the achievement of justice.

5.The conflict between the literal god Zheng and the values. Different cultures and values may lead to differences in people's understanding and pursuit of justice, which can lead to controversy and conflict, which can delay the reality of justice.

It is important to note that the realization of justice is a complex process that can be affected by a variety of factors. Therefore, in the face of injustice or injustice, we should actively seek support and help from various sides to promote the realization of justice.

1. Justice that is late is not justice to the parties; 2. Justice is a socialized term, which is for the public, whether it is late or not, it is justice, and the purpose is to tell you that there is justice in this society; 3. Writers and historians like late justice the most, and looking at the long river of history, the most meaningful thing to write about and discuss is late justice, because at this time, everyone's dramatic attention to events exceeds the attention to justice; Fourth, the late justice that happens to others is justice, but no one wants it to happen to themselves, and they all want it to take effect immediately.

watched a movie "The Silent Truth" for more than four hours, the plot is confusing, the characters in the play who died in vain, a case that has lasted for nearly ten years, and after going through thousands of difficulties and dangers, finally got justice for the victims, gave the society an explanation, and maintained the dignity of the law.

If a person does evil for a while, it is impossible to get away with it for a lifetime, no matter how rich and powerful a person is, you can't beat the law in the whole world. It is precisely because of people like Jiang Yang, Yan Liang, and Zhu Wei that power is locked in the cage of the system and the society runs in a stable manner.

It is often said that justice may be late, but it will never be absent. But if all are so disciplined, why can justice be late? Why? Why? Ever thought about the consequences of the belated arrival of justice? I don't know how many people will be wronged or even die in vain!

Although four years have passed since the arson case of so-and-so that is boiling on the Internet, I always feel that there is something strange, and many mysterious questions have been picked up by netizens, and there is no way to know whether it is true or not. At that time, when the case was heard, there were many doubts, some evidence did not have a reasonable explanation, and one lawyer even left the scene in anger. There is also a doctor who is said to have provided evidence, who has been intimidated several times.

But the case ended with the nanny setting fire to death.

From the bottom of my heart, I very much hope that the nanny did it alone, and I don't want to believe that Lin Moumou is responsible for all this. Because I can't believe the ugliness and cruelty of human nature, I can't believe that the four mother and son died tragically at the hands of their loved ones!

What kind of truth is it, many people are looking forward to it. Justice, why have you not arrived?