How to implement the spirit of justice and equality

We should uphold Marxist thinking, give full play to our subjective initiative, proceed from China's actual conditions, and take the road of socialism with Chinese characteristics.

With China, justice and peace can be implemented.

Hello! It can be understood in this way: A fine spirit of the legal system is the embodiment of a country's vigorous vitality!

Then it is precisely in this way that the people's life and social order will be guaranteed, and the people will establish a more advocable moral quality, so that justice and fairness in the social order will also be reflected, which is the legal system to promote mankind, human beings to promote society, and finally jointly safeguard the homeland....

There are no rules. Only when there is good order can people's society not be chaotic. It also restricts the recklessness of some people.

It is easy to understand that the law can protect social fairness, and people will be equal to each other.

From the perspective of the social contract, people give up some of their powers to the state to carry out, and at the same time get the rights they enjoy as citizens of the state, including the rights protected by law. When it comes to death row prisoners, the nature becomes completely different, first of all, the law deprives death row prisoners of their political rights, which creates inequality. At the same time, the execution of a condemned prisoner must have an executor, so that another perpetrator is born.

The power of this executor is due to the fact that social restraint concentrates all the power of the people in **, and then ** gives this power to the executor to exercise the death penalty. Then, from the perspective of equal responsibility, we are all perpetrators. So, how does the law stipulate the sentencing of murderers?

You may say that death row inmates have done something illegal to do so, and they will be deprived of all their rights. However, you must understand that the original purpose of the law was to protect everyone's right to happiness. So, what if it is because of the existence of the law that some people have to break the law and get happiness?

So, is the very existence of the law still just? The law itself becomes a bondage. And the one who makes the law becomes the author of all inequality.

In modern times, law has moved from rationalism to positivism, which has directly led to many problems that run counter to the original purpose of law. Nowadays, more legal provisions are born to maintain social stability, rather than to guarantee the basic rights of everyone. So, is this deterioration of the law still a law!?

Does it still represent justice!? It is undeniable that such a law does represent the power of a person, and it does represent justice for them, but what about others? Are these two groups of people equal before the law?

The conflict between justice and equality originates from the incomplete coverage of the law, because everyone is different, and it is difficult to find a law that applies to everyone, and only a larger part of the population can be accommodated, and thus disagreements arise. Proponents see it as justice, while opponents see it as an unequal treaty. (Of course, it cannot be said that there is indeed a part of the existing law that does take care of everyone, but these alone are not enough to maintain social stability and operation.) ）

It's good to keep a kind heart, but be careful to be kind and principled!

Stick to your own moral bottom line, abide by your own principles, do your best, and not be affected by people or things that deviate from the direction.

Don't fall into the trap Don't hurt others and yourself Don't look down on others It's basically a good person I also want to be a good person I want to experience my own social value So I want to use my knowledge and ability to help netizens more by knowing this platform.