-
Anonymous users2024-02-13It is a great pleasure to have this friendly debate match with the opposing debaters, and allow me to make concluding remarks on our behalf.
First of all, let me elaborate on my argument further, we do not deny that there are a small number of people in the mass media who deceive and create rumors, but this does not affect the fact that the mass media brings us the truth, nor does it widen the distance between the truth and the public. In the opening argument, we argued that in terms of the motivation and ability of the mass media, the mass media has indeed narrowed the distance between the public and the truth.
We have told you from the three levels of production, operation and final output that the history of the development of mass media is the history of mass media adapting to the objective laws of the media and better meeting the needs of the public. The information disseminated by the masses is moving from a single perspective to a pluralistic one, from chaos to professionalism, and from a flat to a three-dimensional.
The details are more sufficient, the excavation is more profound, and the feedback is more timely, which is what we see today. In fact, the more detailed the information, the more evidence, and the more diverse the perspectives, the more valuable our analysis and comparison become, and the more likely we are to get closer to the truth of the matter. That's why we say that the mass media shortens the distance between us and the truth.
Throughout the debate competition, our side accidentally grabbed the big problem of the opponent's debater, but due to the limited time, I will only list the more serious problems below.
The first question, 1, defines the problem:
2. Changing the concept: Failing to grasp the focus of this debate competition.
3. Partial generalization: The other party's partial generalization is really a blind man touching the elephant, and a leaf is blind.
4. Malicious evasion: The other party repeatedly avoids talking about xx and repeatedly evades our problems, is it that the other party admits that he is at a loss?5. Taken out of context.
6. Turn the object upside down.
The truth is not black and white, and neither of us is omniscient. Therefore, the search for the truth should not only be a result, but also a process of our search. In the process of seeking the truth, we judge, analyze, and compare the information, and strive to restore the facts that are closest to the truth.
Therefore, our evaluation of this debate today is actually to see whether the mass media has helped us in the process of seeking the truth. What we are pursuing today is not really seeking an answer, just like a debate, it is a matter of argumentation that the process trumps the result. This process is the process of approaching the truth, not the conclusion itself, and now, now, the mass media is still developing, and anything that develops will inevitably have shortcomings.
The point of our discussion today is how do we view the mass media? Should we affirm him, or deny him? Do we push him or strangle him in the cradle?
Should we give more control to the press? Or do you give more opportunities for all walks of life to express their voices? A truth-seeking society should be a more inclusive society and one that encourages diverse voices.
If China wants to truly become open and transparent, it must fully develop the mass media and make the mass media their own media! Thank you!
Debate competitions, also known as debate competitions, debate meetings, etc., are generally conducted in the form of multi-person teams, and the form is a competition activity in which both sides participate in the debate on a certain issue, and in essence, it is a related knowledge competition around the debate issue. The debate competition not only tests the thinking ability, reaction ability, expression ability, etc., but also tests the team's cooperation ability and comprehensive ability. >>>More
The construction of a harmonious society depends on personal quality or social quality.
To the pure ostrich Lu foundation.
The free debate session is also an opportunity for the four debates to be brought into play, but it is generally placed in the first half, and when the time for the summary of the four debates is approaching, it is time to prepare to speak. >>>More
Summary. Hello dear, you can choose the position of one debate if you are less able, but due to the different rules of the competition system, there may be some differences, and sometimes four debates are also OK. However, the three debates should be more aggressive and not suitable for novices. Fourth, it is important to argue with difficulty. >>>More
Debate: Internet language poisons China's language and culture. >>>More