How do you balance process fairness and outcome fairness?

Process fairness and outcome fairness are not opposites, and the example you gave is not appropriate and cannot be used to discuss this issue. Process fairness involves the process of obtaining results, such as who will divide the food, who will supervise the process, the qualification of supervisors, etc., and there is no question of who will share how much.

The fairness of the result is, of course, the result of looking at the score. Your example only involves the result, not the process, how to weigh it, of course, it is necessary to pay equal attention, not to be biased, because it is not in conflict.

There must be a powerful third-party force to influence the progress of the incident, and the fairness at this time is the fairness in the eyes of the third party. Otherwise, such as the fat and the thin, who can fight is naturally taken to the fairness of whom. There is no need to weigh up, power is fairness, and power is justice.

Rather than seeking Nash equilibrium, we must first ask what the meaning of being full is, if it is just to quench hunger, then according to everyone's subjective feelings, eat the same level of hunger. If it is to supplement physical energy and continue to cooperate, then it should be given more to those who are more capable, whether it is mental or physical supplementation. If it doesn't make sense, then go for it yourself.

As a manager, it should be result-oriented, then the evaluation should also be based on objective results, the indicators that can be quantified as much as possible, and the performance can be evaluated with numbers, which can be objective and fair, and the process, pay, and other factors can be taken into account in the final benefit distribution.

Heard about fairness of opportunity and fairness of outcome, in terms of the way it is distributed. There is also procedural justice.

and outcome justice, in terms of law.

Personally, I think that formal fairness is more in line with public expectations. Some people are not smart, and they will accept it if they look fair. But in reality, many things are difficult to be substantively fair.

The college entrance examination is a fair form of thing, which has changed the trajectory of life for many ordinary people. However, some people actually do not pass the college entrance examination and study abroad to obtain a nationally recognized academic qualification.

That's all for that, I hope it helps you with your questions!

The two should be combined together, but also pay attention to the steady improvement of the process and results, and there should be a good order. We should also pay attention to some of the details, and also pay attention to the process and the result.

Process fairness and outcome fairness are both very important, and only a fair process can produce fair results.

I think we should pay more attention to process fairness, because only process fairness can have a fair result, so we should pay attention to the process.

Process fairness or outcome fairness, I think outcome fairness is more important, but this is just my opinion, which one do you think is more important, process fairness or outcome fairness?

In daily life, there are many people who feel very sad because of some things, but I think this is a normal thing, because I think it is very normal for this kind of thing to happen in the current society, so we must look at it rationally, don't bring unnecessary trouble to ourselves, and I think that whenever something happens, the result is very important, because there are many people who value the result very much, so I think the process fairness is compared with the result fairness, I think it's important to be fair in the results.

In my daily life, I think it is more important to have a fair result, because I think that if the result is fair, it will make a person very happy, it will make a person very confident, and if the situation is very good, it will make a person very good. But if the result is very unfair, then it will make a person become very unconfident, it will also make a person become very inferior, and even make a person's personality become very introverted, not good at communicating with people at all, whenever they encounter something, they don't dare to face it at all, they will only escape, if the situation is very serious, it will also make a person very depressed, so I think that process fairness and outcome fairness are more important than outcome fairness.

In a person's life, there will always be some very unfair things, but when we encounter these things, we must look at them rationally, and don't let ourselves become very sad, because there are many solutions to things like this, I can solve these things by calling the police, I can also file a lawsuit with the court, or I can also report the other party to the relevant departments, so when we encounter these things, we must protect our rights and interests through proper channels, and don't be afraid of the other party. Therefore, it can also be seen that process fairness and outcome fairness are more important than outcome fairness.

Process fairness is more important, as long as the process is fair, two people will get a fair and just result, so I think it is more important than the result fairness.

The fairness of the result is more important, if the process is fair, and the final result is unfair, I think it is more devastating for people, and if the process is unfair, when the result is fair, it can also give us a comfort.

The fairness of the result is more important, for me the process is not important, the most important thing is the result, because everything I am busy with is for something else.