Do people with low morals have a low social level?

People with low morals have a fixed social layer. The high-rise has to be loaded, and you will drink half of the coffee on the low-rise, and bring it back to the full, no problem, it is not easy to make money, how can you wait for the waiter. Only this is not enough, and there are those who catch up and surpass later.

At this time, it cannot be as detached as the upper layer and as natural as the lower level. It's easy to have psychological and personality problems. There is no choice when it is stressful.

TK: "Actually, the first time I heard that I was going to oppress someone, I refused. Because, if you can't let me press it, I'll press it right away.

First of all, I want to try (the venue), because I don't want to add some stunts after the pressure is finished, and the road "bangs", which is very hard and fake, so that the audience will definitely scold me when they come out, there is no such road at all, which proves that the one above is fake. Later, I also confirmed that the road on the square was indeed real, and I pressed it for about a month, and I felt very cool, not only for myself, but also for a group. Later, when I pressed it, I also asked them not to add stunts, because I wanted the audience to see that this is what I look like after I press it, and you will be like this after I press it. ”

The bottom of the social hierarchy and the moral underground are actually the problem of chicken and egg, and they are cause and effect of each other.

The author himself has a fault, deliberately provoking contradictions in society. I don't believe the author of this question and answer, his life is not satisfactory, and he should belong to the category of exterminators.

Hehe, hehe, hehe, hehe!

In order to live, they have to stick to low-level positions, and employees in this atmosphere can better understand the hardships and helplessness of life.

They gradually turn their noses up at their dreams, realizing that people at the bottom like themselves, if they don't work hard and improve themselves, then they can only pay for the quality of life of others forever.

In the workplace, ordinary employees are at the bottom and are under the direct supervision of their supervisors. They are running for life, and their dreams of the past are sealed in the depths of their memories by Dusty Zen.

In the workplace, they may be criticized on a daily basis for the poor quality of their work. But for supervisors, they only care about their own tasks and indicators, and it doesn't matter whether the employee's work process is difficult or not, as long as they can get satisfactory results in the end, there is no problem.

As a result, many employees are in a vicious cycle of staying up late to work overtime, being criticized, staying up late and working overtime, and being criticized. For employees, the overdraft of their energy is about to crush them, but their superiors never take into account their feelings.

In fact, if these supervisors or leaders are replaced, they are not necessarily better than the employees, or even worse than the employees, and the reason why they show off their power is because they have enough social status, or the dexterous person is the economic base.

Or contextual relationships.

Because people at the lower levels of society have no ability, no ability, and are even less economically.

So there are those that are not taken seriously.

The first reason is that historical problems have caused social forces not to maintain the moral level, but to eat the old moral roots. All levels of the upper and lower classes are looking at money, which leads to a continuous decline in the moral bottom line.

The second reason is that the distribution problem has led to the inability of many enthusiastic people to uphold morality, and the wrong rule of law has led to the law being greater than morality, and correct moral behavior has been judged to be illegal.

The third reason is that institutional problems lead to social problems that cannot be quickly reported to the upper echelons, and it is difficult to quickly adjust erroneous policies, which in turn accumulates political problems, leading to the corruption of the political core and lowering the moral level.

The human heart corrupts its morals and makes society disharmonious.

There is no truth to this statement. There is no direct relationship between an individual's moral quality and the level of education he accepts, and the cultivation of moral quality is cultivated according to future generations, so the lower the level of education, the lower the moral quality, this sentence is unreasonable.

It doesn't make sense. The level of education shows that the knowledge is profound, and the high and low cannot be the existence of high and low quality, but can only show the difference between high and low quality.

No, it doesn't make sense. The level of education and education does not correspond to the level of moral quality, just like a beggar who picked up tens of thousands of yuan and sent it to the police station, while the female doctor knocked down all the warning signs and garbage cans in the scenic spot.

Educational level and moral quality are two different concepts, and they cannot be equated, let alone proportional. People with a high level of education do not necessarily have a high moral quality, and people with a low level of education do not necessarily have a low moral quality. The level of education can only represent how high a person's knowledge level is, and the moral quality represents how a person's ideological quality is, which is not the same thing, so it cannot be confused.