What kind of value is the source of use value?

As far as the use-value of commodities is concerned, labour is not the only source of material wealth consisting of use-value. There are two sources of use value, namely natural matter and human labor. In the words of William Petty, quoted by Marx, labor is the father of wealth, and land is the mother of wealth.

But there is only one source of commodity value, and that is the abstract labor of human beings.

The source of use value is exchange value. Use value is the material basis of exchange value, and together with value, it constitutes the duality of commodities.

The value of a commodity is expressed in the form of the property of a commodity that is exchangeable with other commodities. Exchange value is first expressed as the proportion of the amount of one use value exchanged for another.

Use value note:

From the perspective of commodities, there must be both use value and value at the same time. This is because, if an object has no use value, even if people have labored for it, it has no value; An object, although it has a use value, has no value if it is not a product of labor.

There are two sources of use value, which are natural matter and human labor. Labor is not the only factor that creates use value, it is not only labor that creates use value, but also non-labor factors of production such as land, equipment, and raw materials also contribute to the creation of use value, and labor and various non-labor factors of production together constitute the source of use value.

Use value is one of the common attributes of all commodities, any item must have a value that can be used by human beings in order to become a commodity, otherwise, an item with no use value will not become a commodity, and the use value is the natural attribute of the item.

The use value and value of commodities are opposites and unity

1. Uniformity is manifested in the fact that as a commodity, it must have both use value and value factors.

2. The antagonism is manifested in the fact that the use value and value of commodities are mutually exclusive, and the two cannot be both. For example, A produces leather shoes, at this time, A has the use value of leather shoes, and if you want to obtain the value of leather shoes, you need to sell the shoes. The value is relatively abstract, so the value is expressed with **, for example, the production of tanks will cost a lot of human labor, so the value is higher and more expensive.

At this time, consumers need to spend money to buy shoes, that is, transfer value to obtain use value, and producers to transfer use value in exchange for value. Value and use value, can only have one of them, can not have both, other provinces have examined cases, can not have both value and use value reflects the opposite.

3. Use value is the material bearer of value. Examination: Use value is the material bearer of value (correct); Value is the material bearer of use value (error).

The purpose of transferring value is to obtain use value, such as buying a computer or a water cup, because it is useful, people are willing to buy it, and the material bearer is the purpose of acquisition.

Abstract labor. It is the source of value. Abstract labor refers to human labor without distinction from the concrete form of labor.

There is no qualitative difference in abstract labor, only quantitative difference. Abstract labor is the only source of value, but abstract labor is not equal to value, and abstract labor can only form value when it is condensed into commodities. Abstract labor and concrete labor are two aspects of the same labor, abstract labor creates value, and concrete labor creates concrete value.

Abstract labor is the source of value. Abstract labor refers to human labor without distinction from the concrete form of labor. There is no qualitative difference in abstract labor, only quantitative difference.

Abstract labor is the only source of value, but abstract labor is not equal to value, and abstract labor can only form value when it is condensed into commodities. Abstract labor and concrete labor are two aspects of the same labor, abstract labor creates value, and concrete labor creates concrete value.

The source of the value of the great lack of coincidence is (

a. Specific labor).

In the process of producing use value, labor, capital, land, and technology are indispensable, and Marx affirmed the equal importance of various factors of production in the production of wealth, saying: "Labor is not the only source of the use value it produces, that is, material wealth." As William Peddy said: . .

Labor is the father of wealth, and land is the mother of wealth. "Concrete labour and the various factors of production together constitute the source of use-value. Value is different, value is the undifferentiated human labor condensed in commodities, abstract labor is the entity that forms value, and labor is the only source of value creation.

The material element is only the material condition for value creation, it does not create any value atom.

Concrete labor creates the use value of commodities, but labor is not the only source of use value, and there are two sources of use value, namely the means of production and human labor. If, based on the fact that the production of use value is inseparable from the means of production (the tools of labor and the objects of labor), we think that the value of commodities also has two sources, and that both the means of production and the laborers create value, we are cognitively confused with the different attributes of use value and value, and thus with concrete labor and abstract labor.

The so-called value and abstract labor embody the economic relations between people, and all social material wealth can only be formed through human labor. It is in this sense that we say that the substance of value is human abstract labor, and that the only source of value is labor. The failure to recognize labour as the sole source of value is an attempt to conceal the essence of exploitation by the bourgeoisie, which takes advantage of its appropriation of the means of production and the uncompensated appropriation of the labour of others.

The source of value is demand. For example, if a diamond is not needed by people, then it has no value.

In fact, it feels like the most simple supply and demand relationship, these are the standards that can be measured by value, of course, sometimes it is really beyond expectations and its own value, such as antiques, these are after all, some are to study the habits of the ancients and other methods and means, but personally, Huai Min These are just a value preservation items, how much cultural precipitation there really is. It would take some research on these by collectors to be able to do so.

The source of commodity value is abstract labor.

1. Commodities are labor products used for exchange, which have two factors: use value and value.

The use value of a commodity is the attribute that a commodity can be used to meet a certain need of people. For example, clothes keep out the cold, and food is full of branches.

Use value is the natural attribute of the commodity, reflecting the relationship between man and nature in material transformation.

The value of a commodity is the general, undifferentiated human labor (abstract labor) condensed in the commodity. Originates, mental activity, physical exertion.

Value is the social attribute of commodities, reflecting the relationship between people in exchange for labor.

2. The duality of labor in the production of commodities determines the two factors of commodities.

Concrete labor creates use value.

Abstract labor forms value.

3. The source of commodity value is different from the source of use value.

There are two sources of commodity use value: one is concrete labor; The second is the means of production (the means of labor and the objects of labor).

Marx pointed out in Capital: "Labor is not the only source of the use-value it produces, that is, material wealth. As William Peddy said, labor is the father of wealth, and land is the mother of wealth. ”mnq-23

There is only one source of commodity value: abstract labor.

The value of a commodity derives from its use, and if there is a use, then there is value.

It is the essential attribute of the commodity, and it is the commodity that can bring use value to people. It is also the usefulness of things.

Commodity value refers to the important factors that affect the development of the international metropolis of the renminbi, and its source is the method we choose.

There are two sources of use value, which are natural matter and human labor. Labor is not the only factor that creates use value, it is not only labor that creates use value, but also non-labor factors of production such as land, equipment, and raw materials also contribute to the creation of use value, and labor and various non-labor factors of production together constitute the source of use value.

Use value is one of the common attributes of all goods. In order for any commodity to be a commodity, it must have value that can be used by human beings. Conversely, a commodity without use value will not be a commodity, and use value is a natural attribute of the commodity.

Natural matter is the basis for the usefulness of commodities, and the reason why a nail is useful enough to be driven into an object and connect with other objects is that the nail is made of steel, and the hard texture of steel is shaped by nature. Nature shapes the usefulness of things like texture.

The production of commodities carried out by human beings is a transformation activity carried out on the basis of natural materials, and the specific labor of human beings in this activity further creates the use value of commodities. In addition to the solid texture given by nature, the shape, size, and weight of a nail are transformed on the basis of natural substances according to the needs of human beings, so that it can eventually become a nail, otherwise it can only be a piece of steel. The labor involved in producing the use-value of a nail is concrete, which means that the labor involved in producing the use-value of different kinds of commodities is substantially different and different.

This question touches on some basic concepts of the theory of value and economics. In economics, value refers to the degree to which people demand a certain good or service, or how much people are willing to pay for a certain good or service. The source of value can be many factors, such as scarcity, demand, supply, production costs, etc.

To some extent, it can be said that use value is the source of value. Because only when people use a certain item or service can they experience its value and will be willing to pay for it**. For example, the value of a book lies in the knowledge and entertainment it provides, and it is only when people read the book that they can experience its value and be willing to pay for it**.

However, use value is not the only source of value. In some cases, the value of an item or service may not be related to the use value. For example, some works of art are valued by their rarity and historical value, rather than their use value.

In addition, the ** of some commodities may be affected by factors such as supply and demand, production costs, policies, etc., and their value is not fully correlated.

Therefore, it can be said that use value is an important source of value, but it is not the only one. In economics, the value of value is a complex issue that needs to be considered by a variety of factors.