In the face of affection and justice, how will most people choose?

I believe that most people will still choose love. Although love and justice are invisible, the binding force of friendship is often greater. For example, a very simple example, your good friend cheats, can you report him?

Apparently not. At least for me, I can't. Because they are your good friends, there is a deep affection between you, and you don't want to make him ugly.

Although you know that reporting it may be better for her life in the future, I just can't do it. I don't want to hurt her, no one wants to be reported by my good friends, and if I make a mistake, I also hope that my friends can cover me, which is a very selfish and common sense mentality.

In the American drama Vampire Diaries. A mother, as a local police officer, is looking for vampires everywhere, and she is very ruthless with every vampire, and she must be brought to justice. Because she loves all the people who live there.

With a very strong sense of responsibility, she will definitely give them a safe living environment. is such a mother who couldn't accept this fact when she faced her daughter becoming a vampire, and was sad for a while, but she never reported her daughter, but when her daughter was in danger. Came forward and finally cleared up the idea.

You just need to understand your daughter and not hurt others. It will not pose a danger to the current living environment. This was satisfying, and she was at one point shielding her daughter and other vampire friends.

It is true that she gave up justice because of family affection, but this cannot be a reason to blame him, because the vast majority of people will not choose. Maybe when you don't face a real problem, you will feel that you will be righteous, but when you really encounter a problem, you know that family affection will make you unable to let go. Especially for very, very close people, if it is a general relationship, then you may choose justice, if it is your father or mother, then I believe it must be family affection first, justice last.

It is a common phenomenon that most people choose love over justice.

We often hear a saying that goes like this: "It's none of your business, hang high." ”

Many times, when a matter does not involve our own feelings and interests, we will judge it from the moral high ground. But once this matter is related to us, we often can't be so rational.

The same thing happens to someone else, and you will stand in the perspective of justice to judge how well the villain in this story is doing. But if you are really put in the position of that villain, what you really do may not be better than others.

People are selfish.

It's like two girls quarreling over something, and the fault is on one of the girls, but her boyfriend just comes up indiscriminately and messes around, saying what happened to the other girl. Shut up about your girlfriend's faults, and even excuse her.

When you see this little story now, you will definitely think that this boy is like this, is it amazing to have a boyfriend? Do you deserve to be bullied if you don't have a boyfriend? All in all, you will definitely feel that this boy is wrong, after all, it was his girlfriend who made a mistake, and he should discipline his girlfriend well and make a compensatory for his girlfriend.

This is from the perspective of an outsider, and we have chosen to be on the side of justice.

But if at this time, the situation changes, you are the girl who made the mistake. What would you think if you had a fight with someone and your boyfriend asked you to apologize to the other person after learning what had happened?

You may realize that something is wrong with you, but I think most people's first thought is, "Are you her boyfriend or mine?" Why are you turning your elbows outward? ”

When we are in the game, we tend to be on the side of the sentiments.

I will choose love and justice according to the situation at that time. If my friend did something wrong and only I knew, I would let him go for the sake of our affection, but if he did something particularly wrong, I might think about it. Or that many people know that he did something wrong.

I probably won't forgive him and protect him. Because I'm afraid that my cover-up behavior will cause others to think badly about me. Therefore, most people will take not losing their own interests as the premise in the face of affection and justice.

In the eyes of an upright man, justice is his faith, and he will not shield those who make mistakes because of any emotion. This type of person is usually not liked, and everyone thinks they are too iron-faced and ruthless. And in the eyes of a person who values affection, love is everything to them, and they are very willing to pay for their friends, even violating their own morality.

And at this time, everyone felt that they were playing favoritism. Everyone's views are very contradictory, and people are even more conflicted when faced with the choice of love and justice.

I often see a clip in a costume TV series where a poor man steals money to treat his family. From a moral point of view, he was wrong and he shouldn't have stolen. But from the perspective of affection, he was right, he was in order to treat his family, and he was forced to choose to steal.

So in the face of this situation, what decision should we make? In fact, I think that our life should not have the multiple-choice question of affection and justice, because the answer to the multiple-choice question is too simple, and because affection and justice are equally important, if there is no emotion in this society, how can there be justice.

Therefore, it is really difficult to talk about the multiple-choice question of love and justice, but I believe that most people will choose justice when they encounter this choice.

Indeed, this is a problem that plagues many people in life, and sometimes we are always in a dilemma between justice and affection. Maybe some people will choose friendship and do some bad things, but I think most people in society will still choose justice, because justice will win after all.

We will also encounter a lot of such things in our lives, the most common is to drag the relationship in our work, this phenomenon has many people will be entrusted with the relationship at work in order to sell a friend's face, and then let the friend's child enter the company to work, and then squeeze other people down, this is the so-called in the face of justice and affection, choose affection, I think it is very immoral to do this first. Your friend's request for you also shows that his character is not very good. So in this case, I think it's better to choose justice.

Many people think that if you choose justice in the face of justice and affection, it is equivalent to abandoning the righteousness, so that we will lose our friends, but I don't think that's the case, I think a real friend will not let you make a choice in the face of justice and affection, so if your friend lets you do such a thing, it means that he is a friend who is not worth making deep friends for you, then I think this kind of friendship should not be done.

Therefore, I think that in the face of affection and justice, most people will choose justice, because only when we choose justice, we will not violate our conscience, and our lives will not be psychologically troubled by this choice. We must stick to our principles and not do anything to do things. Only those who stand by their principles can be respected by others.

I think most people will choose friendship, which is a manifestation of human selfishness, but how many people will do it to hurt their relatives and friends for justice?

A few days ago, something happened at my cousin's house: my cousin-in-law was driving a long-distance bus, because my cousin wanted to pull more guests, so he picked up work at the bus station in advance, and at this time there was a conflict with other drivers. My cousin was beaten.

After receiving my cousin's **, my cousin and I took a taxi to the passenger station to reason with others, and then the police came, and after asking the reason, it was determined that it was my cousin's fault, but my cousin and I were pursuing the matter of others beating people.

In this matter, I chose not to be righteous, although we were wrong, but we could not suffer the loss of being beaten. When this happens, I think 90% of people will be like me!

For example, when I was in school, we encountered countless choices like this, but my choice was still on the side of love and righteousness, although sometimes it was cruel to others:

When Xiaoba was a freshman in the dormitory, his girlfriend was unexpectedly pregnant, Xiaoba belonged to the kind of good baby who had just left his parents, and he was at a loss, and his brother Seven gave him an idea, and he must call his parents.

After the parents of both parties found out, they decided that the child could not stay. The girl went to the hospital, and less than half a year after being discharged, the two broke up.

The reason is that Xiaoba is empathetic and don't fall in love, and the seven of us have a heart-to-heart talk to Xiaohachi and abuse it, which can't change the ending. Although what he did was scummy, we forgave him later, and when his ex-girlfriend came to him again, we chose to help him escape.

Now it's just a joke we use to gossip, but it shows our selfishness! But there's no way to change that1

In the case of breaking the law and committing crimes, I will choose justice, and in terms of social morality, I will choose affection. I know very well that it is wrong to break the law and commit crimes, and if an important person around me has committed a crime or crime, then I will choose to call the police and help the police arrest him, and I firmly believe that I am doing it for his good. He will thank me when he comes out in the future, I am avoiding his continued mistakes, people can't be wrong for a lifetime, so there are no exceptions to this situation, and I can even do it if I kill my relatives in righteousness.

But if the people around me are not doing well because of social morality, then I will choose affection and righteousness, and I will help them to correct it slowly until they do it well. For example, my lover accidentally bumped into an aunt while riding a bicycle, and my lover apologized positively, but the aunt had to ignore people and said that my lover was very bad, so I would stand up and defend her, and maybe I would reach out and hit this aunt if it was serious. I know it's not right to do this, it's just protecting my shortcomings, but I'm willing to do it, and I'm willing to be the one who doesn't have the quality.

Theoretically speaking, love and justice coexist, there is indeed an opposing side, and when the opposition is often the last thing everyone wants to see, but there is no way to choose one side after all. The above two choices are my own, and I firmly believe that this choice is what I think in my heart and will be implemented. Other people may choose love, after all, many times justice does not make us feel better, but will bring me a lot of trouble.

So there are people who don't go back and choose justice. There is a measure in my heart, for the people I care about I do, I will do it out of the good for them, I want them to live better instead of deceiving myself and harming them.

Justice is the most important, because justice is a person's most basic belief, and it is also the most basic thing a person does.

My opinion is that justice is always more important than human feelings, because fairness and justice are so important in this society, and if you only value the relationship between people, you are likely to wronged many righteous people.

Justice and human affection are very important. None of them can be missing, and if one of them is missing, then we must have a flawed character.

Justice is the most important, justice is above everything, otherwise what do you want the law to do, it is used to restrain citizens, so justice is the most important?

I think it depends on what you're dealing with. If you don't break the law and discipline, you have the ability, it's naturally good to be able to take care of people's feelings, if you break the law and discipline, justice must be the most important.

Both are important, in some cases we must choose justice, and we must not lack human affection, the most important thing in human life is these two points, and we will understand more and more when we get older.

Personally, I feel that both are very important, which is the most basic principle of getting along with others, and only when these two are combined can we have a good relationship.

Justice is more important because society is bound by law, and sometimes you can't go against your true thoughts because of human feelings.

Compared with justice, I think the most important thing is justice, because the most important thing for us to be a human being is to be true and sincere, to uphold justice, and not to be vain.

I want not only to be loved, but also fair and notarized. Love should exist as equals. Family affection and justice, in fact, are different things, have different emphases, and cannot be generalized!

Life is like a glass of boiled water, family affection occupies half of the boiled water, salty, which should be savored. But justice is also very important, and the truth can only be slowly experienced and realized in your life! In the face of family affection and moral justice, I personally believe that moral justice should be chosen.

If you describe such a result, everyone will have a dull pain in their hearts, and it will eventually hurt the family affection.

From the point of view of the social contract system, people cede a part of their power to the state to enforce it, and at the same time gain the rights enjoyed by the citizens of the country, including the rights protected by law. When this issue involves death row inmates, it is of a completely different nature. First, the law deprives death row prisoners of their political rights, leading to inequality.

At the same time, there must be an executor to execute the death row inmate, thus producing a perpetrator. The power of this executor is because the social restraint system concentrates all human rights on **, and then **gives this power to the executor to exercise the death penalty. Well, from the point of view of equal sharing of responsibility, we are all perpetrators.

How does the law stipulate the sentencing of **? You might say that death row inmates have done something illegal, which is why they are deprived of all their powers. However, you must understand that the original purpose of the law was to protect everyone's right to happiness.

So, is it because of the existence of the law that some people have to break the law in order to be happy? So, is the very existence of the law just? The law itself becomes a bondage.

And those who make the law become the initiators of all inequality. In modern times, the law has shifted from rationalism to positivism, which has directly led to many problems that are contrary to the original purpose of law.

More legal provisions were born to maintain social stability, rather than to guarantee the basic rights of everyone. So, is this law of degradation still a law? Does it still represent justice?

It is undeniable that such a law does represent a person's rights and justice towards them. What about the others? Are these two groups equal before the law?

The conflict between justice and equality stems from the incomplete coverage of the law, because everyone is different, so it is difficult to find a law that applies to everyone, and only a large part of it can be taken care of, thus creating differences. Disclaimer: Part of this article is **** on the Internet, and the data and related information marked with ** are all cited.