What are the advantages and disadvantages of Qualcomm Xiaolong 625 and Kirin 950?

Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 advantages: Snapdragon 625 is Qualcomm's first eight-core processor built with a 14nm process, and its excellent power consumption control is its signature, and the energy efficiency ratio is more worth looking forward to than Snapdragon 625. All eight cores are A53 and the GPU is Adreno 506, which consumes 35% less power than the previous generation Snapdragon 617.

The Snapdragon 625 supports up to LTE networks. Although the architecture is only Cortex-A53, the maximum frequency of a single core has been increased to 2GHz, and the performance is also excellent, and the Cortex-A72 has been optimized for the 16nm FinFET process node, providing double the performance compared to Cortex-A15-based devices. It supports dual-channel LPDDR3 memory, supports a 13-million-pixel camera and 4K** shooting, and supports Cat7 in terms of networking.

The disadvantage of Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 is that it has a low-end processor, so the performance is definitely not strong enough, although it will not lag when playing games, but it is inevitable to play large games. In terms of GPU, the specifications are lower, and the comprehensive performance is naturally lower.

Kirin 950 advantages: TSMC's 16nm FF+ process is adopted, and the transistor density is twice that of the previous generation; Integrates 4 A72 cores + 4 A53 cores, and the GPU is the new Mali880 MP4 with a frequency of 900MHz. According to the data released by Huawei, the performance of the A72 is 11% higher than that of the A57, and the power consumption is also reduced by 20%. TSMC 16nm FF+ is an enhanced version of the standard 16nm FinFET, with the former offering better performance and power consumption than the latter.

In terms of CPU, Kirin 950 adopts the public architecture provided by ARM, integrating 4 A72 cores + 4 A53 cores.

Disadvantages: Kirin 950 did not integrate the previous ** baseband that supported LTE, but unexpectedly implemented the idea of enough to be good, and directly used the Balong 720 on last year's Kirin 920, this baseband supports the network, and the highest downlink is only 300mbps, which can be called mediocre.

The differences between Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 performance and Kirin 950 are as follows:

1. Differences in process and architecture:

The Kirin 950 uses a commercial 16-nmfinfet plus process and an A72 + A53 architecture. Compared to the A57 core used in previous mainstream flagship chips, the A72 delivers 11 higher performance, 20 less power consumption, and 30 percent more energy efficiency.

The Qianlong 625 is Qualcomm's first octa-core processor with a 14nm process, which is at the same process node as the Qianlong 820 and also supports Quick Charge technology.

2. Differences in positioning:

The Kirin 950 is positioned as a mid-to-high-end product, and its performance is in line with the Miaolong 810 and Exynos 8890 processors, or even more powerful than the latter two.

The M625 processor is positioned as a mid-range processor. Its main features are low power consumption and stability. The 14nm CPU process delivers impressive low-power performance and stable heat generation. The main user group is regular users who don't play (large) games.

3. Differences in performance:

According to the Antu Rabbit score, the Kirin 950 has 1481 single-core performance scores and 5420 multi-core performance scores. The Leap 625 has a single-core and multi-core performance score of 942 and 5129, respectively.

The performance of the Kirin 950 single core is much higher than that of the Kiln 625 because the Kirin 950 uses the A72 architecture core with higher performance, while the Kiln 625 8 core is the A53 architecture core. Generally speaking, the Kirin 950 has a stronger performance than the Kirin 625.

Even if it is the processor of Qualcomm 810, it is not as good as HiSilicon Kirin 950 in CPU performance, not to mention 615 to compare, these 2 processors are not of the same grade at all, HiSilicon 950 wins.

Kirin 950: 4*A72+4*A53, integrated Mali-T880MP4, 16nm process.

Qualcomm 615: Octa-core A53 (including 4* GHz), GPU is Adreno 405, 28nm process.

A72 is the architecture that replaces A57 and outperforms A53 in terms of execution efficiency and performance design.

If you don't understand something, please ask, please be timely after the problem is solved, thank you.

The differences between Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 performance and Kirin 950 are as follows:

1. The difference between process and architecture:

Kirin 950 uses a commercial 16nm FinFET Plus process, A72 + A53 architecture, A72 compared with the A57 core used in the previous mainstream flagship chips, the performance is increased by 11%, and the power consumption is reduced by 20%, and the energy efficiency ratio is increased by 30%.

The Snapdragon 625 is Qualcomm's first octa-core processor built on a 14nm process, which is at the same process node as the Snapdragon 820 and also supports Quick Charge.

2. Differences in positioning:

The Kirin 950 is positioned as a mid-to-high-end product, with performance comparable to the Snapdragon 810 and Exynos 8890 processors, or even stronger than the latter two.

The Snapdragon 625 processor is positioned as a mid-range processor, focusing on low power consumption and stability, and the 14nm CPU process brings quite low power consumption performance and stable heating. The main user base is the general user who does not play (large) games.

3. Differences in performance:

According to the Antutu score, the Kirin 950 has a single-core performance score of 1481 points, and the multi-core performance score has reached 5420 points. The Snapdragon 625 scored 942 for single-core performance and 5129 for multi-core.

The single-core performance of the Kirin 950 is much higher than that of the Snapdragon 625, because the Kirin 950 uses a higher-performance A72 architecture core, while the Snapdragon 625 octa-core is an A53 architecture core. Overall, the Kirin 950 is more powerful than the Snapdragon 625.

This is the processor, the former one is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, and the back is the HiSilicon Kirin 950, which is stronger than the 625 in terms of performance.

1. Kirin 950 is against Xiaolong 820, although it is lower than 820, but overall it is still a level, and Xiaolong 625 is one level lower than Xiaolong 820, 200, 400, 600, 800 four levels.

2. Although the performance of the Snapdragon 625 is inferior to the Kirin 950, there are many new features that surpass the Kirin 950, after all, it is a new processor released by Qualcomm later. The Snapdragon 625 is mainly aimed at the mid-range market, and it is completely impossible to challenge the high-end. Snapdragon 625, although it belongs to the Snapdragon 600 series, as Qualcomm's first eight-core processor built with a 14nm process, excellent power consumption control is its signature, and the energy efficiency ratio is more worth looking forward to than the Snapdragon 625.

3、CPU performance950 is greater than 652,GPU may be worse but it may also be 652 good,After all, Huawei's GPU scum is not a day or two,955 is slightly higher than 950 in terms of running score,But the game is not as good as 950。 In addition, it has the same process node as the Snapdragon 820 and also supports Quick Charge technology. Although the architecture is only Cortex-A53, the maximum frequency of a single core has been increased to 2GHz, and the performance is also excellent, and the Antutu running score is about 60,000.

It is reported that the upgraded version of the OPPO R9 R9S will also use the Snapdragon 625 processor.

The Kirin 950 is against the Xiaolong 820, although it is a little lower than 820, but overall it is still a level, and the Xiaolong 625 is one level lower than the Xiaolong 820 (200, 400, 600, 800 four levels).

Both CPU performance and GPU performance are much stronger than 615