Where do those people in the unit who always quarrel with the leaders come from?

Sometimes you may find that some people dare to argue with leaders in the company. Sometimes, such employees may be expelled to appear, and sometimes, these employees are not just something, but also promoted. What actually happened?

Do you dare to quarrel with the leader in **? It turns out so much truth in fact, there is a lot of truth in this question.

Bald employees bald staff will not comply with leadership, all according to emotions, encounter things that they are uncomfortable with, don't worry if you lead, or boss, he dares to take a table, and you argue. This employee can't mix in the workplace. Emotional people, who do not accept people from leadership management, are not likely to mix in the workplace.

If the leader doesn't deal with you, it's a threat to yourself, so which leaders will give such employees. Therefore, this kind of employee, who dares to quarrel with the leader, is my own emotions at the bottom, I can't control my own situation, others can't say what he is, and the temper will be ignited.

For the employees of the company, some employees and leaders quarrel with the company. This employee and the leader quarrel not emotionally, nor on themselves, but for the good of the entire company. This kind of person is a necessary condition for the company, and as a leader, it also needs such employees, and although the leader is not happy, these people, the leader must also use it, for promotion.

If you don't upgrade such people, you're shooting leadership, and you can't work properly, then the company may lose money. The ultimate damage is still to lead one's own interests. Bao Zheng is such a subordinate, he is for the benefit of the ancient Song Dynasty, not for personal interests, so although he and the emperor have caused controversy several times, the emperor still has to appoint him and promote him.

Sometimes, some company leaders, in order to understand the company or department, no matter who talks about his bad things, may not be able to use the "double reed" to deliberately other employees. Everyone will see this employee as a quarrel and a leader, so those who are behind will think that this person is my own, so I don't have to fight him or even wrap him in the circle of these people. Once this is the case, then there is no leader specifically, it will be exposed, the leader can work very well, and then deal with it for those employees.

In order to promote some employees, I was told stories like this. Within the company, some employees are relatives of department managers, but the relationship between the two is not known. To promote him, the department manager came up with a way.

When the meeting room is held, the manager makes a plan. If the manager, the manager asked everyone did not think of it, all the employees did not dare to say, because the manager's temper was more clear, he proposed the plan, and if you objected, this year, did not want to rise. At this time, the employee stood up and then said, objections, to everyone's surprise, and the manager said, OK, according to this method.

Then the program succeeded. The manager praised the employee and promoted him.

This has nothing to do with confidence, because of their personality, they feel that even if they are part-timers, they should not be angry, and they also feel that the leader's way of dealing with it is not right, so with the straightforwardness of the personality, they will quarrel with the leader.

I think these people are just because they are too confident, they always feel that they are special people, so they have the confidence to quarrel with their leaders.

Because such people are never humble or arrogant, they always do things in a down-to-earth manner, which is their confidence.

In fact, the people who dare to quarrel with the leader in the unit, they must have made certain predictions and know what kind of result they will be after this. Many people are nothing more than targeted after quarreling with the leader, or they are directly dismissed, so they dare to quarrel with the leader, what is their mentality?

I think there must be many situations for people like this, some people dare to quarrel with the leader, because they have been patient for a long time, so they suddenly broke out at this time, they do not say that they were wronged for the first time, or that they were treated unfairly, and they quarreled directly with the leader. They also hope that through quarrels, they can express their emotions, and then let the leaders really pay attention to them, and quarreling in the unit can be said to not save face for the leaders at all. Because they've had enough, that's why they break the jar and break it, and it's just a quarrel with them.

There are also people who are more irritable in their personalities, and when they are treated unfairly, or when they are wronged, they will tell these things in time. Whether it is in life, in feelings, or even in work, it will not condone the unit's suppression of its own bottom line. This kind of personality may not be very good at work, but I think their personality is a better character in life, so that they will know how to protect themselves better.

It's not that they don't know the consequences when they quarrel with their leaders, but that they want to feel more comfortable than the consequences.

A leader is a person we must respect as employees, but if we quarrel with the leader in the unit, it will definitely make them change their opinion of us. I think that if you have the courage to quarrel with the leader, you must know in your heart what will happen to us after this. I think most people must be defending their rights when they quarrel with leaders, so at this time, their mentality is nothing more than wanting to protect themselves.

These people are all daring, especially brave, especially confident, and can speak out directly when they encounter unfair treatment, which is very just.

Generally, this kind of person is very confident, but also has a background, and is not afraid of leadership at all, and this kind of person's mentality is that if you can't do it here, you will change to a new job.

Because these people don't like to be squeezed in the workplace and maintain their inner balance, they dare to quarrel with the leader in the company.

There is no doubt that anyone who dares to quarrel with the leader will have a hard time staying in the company, with two exceptions. The person who quarrels with the leader is the one that the leader attaches great importance to. To put it simply, you are the leader's right-hand man, and the leader can't lose you, because your value to the company is too great, and the leader can't let go of you, so this kind of quarrel or quarrel is normal, and you can continue to stay in the company.

Do what you have to do.

You have a good personal relationship with your leader, which is commonly known as having a relationship. So even if the company quarrels because of disagreement, it won't have much impact. As your leader, it's hard for him to ruthlessly fire you for a little thing.

After all, the relationship is there. But if you are an ordinary employee and quarrel with the leader, it is difficult to stay in the company with a high probability.

You have made a bad impression on the leader; On the other hand, the following violations are taboo in the workplace, and it is difficult for you to stay in the company if the leader does not speak. Conscientious obedience to the arrangements of superiors is passive. If you continue to choose to stay, it will be very difficult to get a promotion and salary increase in the future, because your promotion path needs to be recognized by the leadership.

If you don't get the approval of your leader, or if your leader is a small-bellied person, then your path to promotion will also fail. If you choose to stay, you should prepare for the worst to stay. If you choose to leave, the quarrel between you and the leader will dissipate, and you will go to a new environment to reinvent yourself.

Of course, if you quarrel with the leader, I think it's better to leave.

After all, the bad impression left at the beginning is always imprinted in the hearts of leaders. Even if you are talented, the leader will think you are unreliable. To sum up, in the workplace, it is necessary to minimize quarrels or quarrels with leaders.

After all, the leader is your superior, and the leader also needs face. If you don't give face to the leader, the leader will definitely not give you face in the future. I hope mine can help you, and I also hope you can help me**, like, support me more, and follow me more.

They are all people with relatively high status, and they are also very powerful people, people who are very good at work, people who can create many benefits for the company, people with very cheerful personalities, people who dare to argue with the boss of the company, and those who are the bosses of the leaders, these people dare to quarrel with the leaders, and the leaders dare not talk back.

It's all uninhibited people, people who don't have a mortgage, people who don't have a car loan, people who don't have children, people who are richer because they don't care.

Powerful people, people who can create benefits for the company, and people who lead a level, these people are big guys, and we can't afford to mess with them.

is a very powerful person, maybe a very high-status person, and this kind of person speaks very weighty, so he can do such a thing.

Generally speaking, no subordinate is willing to have a conflict with the leader, tear his face, and make the contradiction public, which is not good for himself, unless he is ready to resign and quit, how to get along in the future? In these years, if you are not afraid of officials, you are afraid of management, and you are not worried about being excluded and suppressed? Quarrels with leaders are often forced to be helpless, and there is no room for mitigation under the Jedi counterattack, and those who dare to do so often have the following types of people:

One is people who are close to retirement. This is easy to understand, I'm going to retire anyway, why can't you stop me, why do you have to put up with you? Just do what you have to do, there's nothing to scruple about.

In our original bureau, there was a deputy section-level cadre who had always looked down on the principal leaders as unpleasant, but because of his status and status, he had to endure it, and it was not until he was about to retire that he questioned the principal leaders about violations of rules and discipline in front of the staff and staff of the whole situation, which made the principal leaders very embarrassed, but they were helpless.

The second is a person who has no desires and no desires. I don't have much hope for the workplace, I don't care if I look down on honor and disgrace, look down on fame and fortune, and reward me with my salary and benefits. If there is no desire, it is rigid, which makes these people not follow the leader's will in the workplace, blindly bend their minds to meet the leader, feel dissatisfied and dare to face the hard top, anyway, I don't care, the can is broken, what can you do with me?

As long as it's not a big problem, you can't drive me. If you open me, you have to weigh the consequences.

The third is people with professional expertise. Capable people tend to have a big temper and sharp edges, which mainly stems from their confidence in their own abilities and levels. In these years, it is not difficult to find a leader, but it may not be easy to find a professional who is capable and competent for the job, and this kind of person needs a long time to train and temper, not a short time can be replaced.

This scarcity also makes such people have a strong independence and autonomy in the face of leaders, dare to make their voices heard, and will not give in easily even if there is a quarrel. The leading cadres will also be polite to these people, coaxing them from time to time, and if they pick a son, they will not find anyone to replace them.

Fourth, there are people who have the backing behind them. There is a person in charge of a subordinate unit, and he worked with the leader in charge in the conference room, and most people think it is incredible, is this guy kicked in the head by a donkey, how dare he do this? In fact, after an analysis, I learned that the person in charge of the subordinate unit is the confidant of the main leader, and the main leader and the leader in charge do not deal with each other very well, so the person in charge of the subordinate unit has never been interested in the leader in charge, and he will do it if he does it.

The end result was that he didn't have anything to do, and the leader in charge was communicated. If there is no strong support behind them, it is estimated that most people will not easily challenge the authority of the leader.

Fifth, part of the thorns. Each unit has more or less individual thorns, or because life is not going well, or because someone instigates it, or because of the upright personality, likes to stand out for righteousness, and works against the leader, which makes the leader a headache.

Maybe the personal ability is relatively strong, the business ability is relatively strong, and they don't particularly care about this job, so they naturally don't care about quarreling with each other.

From their own family conditions are relatively good, no mortgage, no car loan, no pressure, and they are particularly capable, which is the best confidence.

When a spring is overpressed, it will be **; People are the same, when a person is oppressed to a certain extent, the power of resistance may be greater.

The employees who dare to quarrel with the leader in the unit basically have some strength, but such people may not be liked by the leader, and there are two main reasons for this situation.

One, prickly employees.

Thorny employees, themselves will not obey the leader, everything is decided according to emotions, when you encounter something unhappy with yourself, don't care whether you are a leader or a boss, he dares to slap the table with you and quarrel with you. It's impossible for this kind of employee to mix well in the workplace.

Usually people who are seriously emotional, people who do not obey the management of the leader, are unlikely to mix well in the workplace, if the leader does not deal with you, it is a threat to their own power, so that no leader will give such employees a chance. Therefore, this kind of employee dares to quarrel with the leader, the confidence is his own emotions, and he can't control his own situation, others can't say anything about him, and his temper will be ignited as soon as he says it.

Second, for the benefit of the company.

Some employees quarrel with leaders for the good of the company. This kind of quarrel between employees and leaders is not emotional, nor for themselves, but for the benefit of the whole company. This kind of person is necessary for the company, as a leader also needs such employees, although the leader is not happy, but such a person, the leader must also use, to promote.

If you don't promote such a person, you will be surrounded by leaders who are patting on the back and not working well, then the company may lose money. In the end, it is the leaders themselves who are harmed. Bao Zheng was such a subordinate, and he was for the interests of the Great Song Dynasty, not for his personal interests, so although he had several disputes with the emperor, the emperor still wanted to appoint him and promote him.