In the work, the leader pays more attention to the world or the ability to work?

Is it important to hurt people at work, or is it important, and what is leadership? The proposal for this question is relatively simple, and I really have a feeling. Because the conditions given are not clear, it is really not easy to answer.

What state "we must determine" is the" world "and the ability to work"? Let's take a look at what leaders are able to do about these questions. Is it a business?

Is it leading itself? Still an employee? You know this, and you might have enough reasons to come to this question.

It is the "people" and the "ability to work" of the "people" judging from the questions given by the question, and "being the world" and "the ability to work" is a fixed attitude or an act that does not change with other factors. So, the question is a non-white, black choice problem. It is a matter of non-white and black choice, so it can only be paid in different states.

There is no clear leadership for your questions in order to treat them, we can only discuss and analyze them from the following aspects, for the questioner to enter or choose. If we want to look at this question of the company, we should understand what the company means. Businesses are effective to society through their own values, and they have reaped their affirmation and rewards (profits) that enable companies to cultivate healthy development in this virtuous cycle.

It is not difficult to see that creating profits is the "ability to work", not the "human being". Then, from the entire level of the enterprise, it is more important than the "ability to work", otherwise there would not be so many companies that would compete for talent with empty ideas. From the actual operation of a modern business, you can also realize the importance of proven work competencies by respecting the behavior of the market sector.

It is the leader who grants his own point of view that it should be more important to "become a world". First of all, he hopes to lead or guide and motivate employees to continue to create more and better value for the company. He also prayed for promotion, which needed to be recognized for excellence in leadership among the "people."

This is what is often referred to as a "moral place". It is said that leadership does not directly generate profits, so leadership is more important than "being the world". IT employees?

If you stand in the lead, you will see the employees and have two considerations and hits. First, leaders need the value of their teams to create leadership. From this point of view, the leader will be "the ability to work"; It is to advance from the aspect of leadership facilitation, and he has the responsibility and obligation to train employees to take a higher leadership position, and then promote evaluation.

It is "life" to meet the basic requirements of the leader "German classification".

At work, "people" and "ability to work" are more important? It decides to understand your development. I've seen a similar discussion in the answer to a similar question.

When your development route is developed in this way, "people in the world" will pay attention to it; When your development route progresses to technical depth or just the perfect employee direction, the "ability to work" will be biased. Of course, it is necessary to have anywhere "red and special" talents. What do you say?

Pay more attention to work ability, because a person with strong work ability can bring benefits to the company, the company will develop better and better, and can also become a role model for other employees and drive the enthusiasm of other employees.

I think that in the work, the leader values the ability to work, because if you are a good person, but the ability to work is not good, then it is in vain, so you pay more attention to the ability to work.

It's more important to be a person. Because if a person's emotional intelligence is very high, then he knows how to deal with people very well, so that he can also be recognized by the leader, and the leader prefers such employees.

If a person is good at communicating with others, it will bring great economic income to the company.

Of course, it is important to pay attention to the ability to work, because a person's ability to work is strong, the leader will attach great importance to it, and will bring better benefits to the company.

Leaders value your ability to do your job more than anything else. Because the employee's job is to do what they should do, not to look at your ability to behave in the world.

It's important to deal with people, because a lot of time you need to communicate, and communication can avoid a lot of things.

As a leader, what do you value more in terms of ability and character? Ability can be cultivated and improved through exercise, training, and learning in the unit, but character is the embodiment of a person's moral quality, and a person does not want to change himself, and it is difficult for others and units to change his character. As a leader, you must be able to select and appoint talents, discerning people, being virtuous is about character, and ability is about ability, and both must be possessed is the leader's favorite.

What do leaders value more? In fact, it also depends on the leader's personal choice. Some people's abilities and abilities are not reflected all at once, and only long-term contact can observe their character and abilities.

If it is a person of very poor character, everyone will hate such a person, and naturally the leader will also eliminate such a person. But if a person's ability is poor, it can't be the reason why everyone hates it, and maybe there is a possibility of improvement.

If I am a leader, of course, I pay more attention to character, and people with poor character are in the unit, and I don't feel at ease when I give him tasks, and I don't have a sense of trust at all. Without trust, important work will not be entrusted to him. If a person's ability is poor, then do some simple work, different positions need people, and slowly exercise the ability will always improve.

As a leader, perhaps many people value character more! No matter how outstanding the ability is, but the character is not good......This road can not go far, ability is attached to the character, character is a person and the things that have been born, it is difficult to change and copy if you want to shape it; But the ability is different, the replasticity is very strong, and it can be exercised differently in different periods, and when the ability is exercised to a certain level, it is self-defeating! So I appreciate character more.

Character is better than ability, character shaping is difficult, it is cultivated from childhood, ability can be changed through learning, good character is not necessarily good, good character must be able to improve ability through learning, so if I am a leader, character is more important than anything else! The greater the ability, the greater the contribution, the greater the ability of the person with bad character, the greater the destructive power, the character is far more important than the ability, even if the person with no problem with the character is not capable, it will never be negative. It's just that the contribution value is low, and it won't be a hindrance to cause destruction.

People with bad character are more or less pulling their hind legs, and their destructive power depends on the size of their ability.

Character is definitely more important, if a person's ability is not good, it can be cultivated slowly, but if a person's character is not good, it will have a huge impact on the enterprise.

As a leader, ability and character, I value character more, because if the character is not good, no matter how strong the ability is, it is in vain.

As a leader, what should be more important should be character, how a person can be reused for the company, whether it is trustworthy, character is very important, and ability can be obtained by hard work in the later stage.

Both are very important, character is more important, people with good character can make their enterprises develop better, and can make enterprises more stable.

As a leader, I value character, although ability is also very important, but character is more important than ability.

As a leader, I believe that ability and character are just as important, and if I had to choose one or the other, I think character is more important.

Character, if there is a character that I don't have the ability to, I can slowly cultivate it, and I don't have to worry about making any unforgivable mistakes. Having the ability to have no character is a time bomb, maybe it will plant mines for you at any time, let you deal with the problem and blame you.

What I value more is character. If there is no problem with the person's character, through continuous efforts, he can also improve his ability. But if the character is not good, I will not reuse such employees.

As a leader and character, I pay more attention to the character of the employee, only if he has a good character, I will reuse him and trust him.

Character, we must first learn to be a person and learn to do things, if the character is not good, the ability is in vain.

What is more important is ability, if the ability is stronger, it can drive the value of the enterprise's income, and it can also improve the ****.

Therefore, in terms of ability and moral choice, the boss will prefer employees with moral values, and ask which company is willing to use them. This is also what leaders value the most!

As a leader, I think character should be more important, if you can't even do a good job, even if you have the ability, what's the use?

As a leader, ability and character are definitely more important. At the same time, character is also very important, if there is no ability. Only character, that's not good.

As a leader and character, I think we should pay more attention to character.

In the workplace, is competence or life important? What do you think?

First, because most people are relatively mediocre, the way of dealing with the world is more important.

Most of the employees are ordinary people, trying to complete their own work, step-by-step two points and one line, running around the company and family, many people have been repeating this state, and have not completed the big results, but there are no major shortcomings. In the eyes of the boss, this kind of mediocre person will not have much room for promotion, and those employees who work in general but know the world very well are promoted quickly, because the boss needs employees to expand their contacts and firmly grasp the hearts of customers. If an employee wants to have a better future, he must learn how to behave in the world.

Second, ability can make a person stand out at a critical time and be appreciated by the leader.

The work of many companies is more professional, and it requires a lot of professionals, and it is not possible to complete the task by playing tricks, so it can be said that ability is a prerequisite for having a stable job. When the company encounters a big project or difficulty, the person with strong ability will meet the eyes of the boss, because such employees can give full play to their own advantages, complete the work beautifully, and also make the company's reputation continue to improve, creating more benefits for the company.

3. I think skills and interpersonal skills should be improved so that we can have better development.

Personally, in my opinion, if you want to be a good employee in a company, you have to develop yourself well. Learn professional skills from colleagues and make yourself a rare talent in the company, so that you will not worry about being surpassed by newcomers; When dealing with colleagues and leaders, we should pay attention to words, and when communicating with customers, we should not always say our own thoughts, but also listen to the voice of customers. I believe that if I continue to work hard, I will definitely become a celebrity in the eyes of my boss.

I think it's the ability that matters. If you don't have the ability, you won't be able to develop, and if you're just a human being, you can only develop for a while, not for a long time.

In the workplace, ability and dealing with others are very important, but I personally think that the most important thing is ability, and I need to continue to learn and improve myself.

In the environment of the workplace, it is necessary to have strong ability and a certain ability to deal with the world, so that you can survive well in the workplace and not be eliminated by this society.

As a leader, what do you value in terms of ability and character?

1.Character. If a person's ability is not good, it can be cultivated slowly, but if a person's character is not good, the impact on the enterprise is huge.

As a leader, we should pay more attention to character. Whether a person can be reused by the company and whether he is trustworthy. Character is very important, and ability can be acquired through later efforts.

Ability can only be cultivated slowly after tomorrow. If the learning ability is not enough, then he can at least do some hygiene work, carefully cultivated. At least he can be a person who is beneficial to society and will not harm others.

2.In the early stage of the company's development, competent employees will definitely improve the company's operation and production schedule. What would otherwise take a long time to complete, competent employees can complete in an extreme amount of time, reducing the company's consumption and expenses, and improving the progress of work.

The development of the company is inseparable from the training of employees. Developing potential employees is the first choice of every boss, and the boss pays special attention to those who have managerial and technical skills as well as good diplomatic skills. The boss also needs talents, and the selection of talents will be carried out from those employees with outstanding ability, and capable people will become managers of the company's initial development.

The question of competence between people. It is impossible for everyone to be strong or weak, but people with a good attitude are easier to manage and easier to form a team atmosphere.

3.Attitude is a controllable factor, such as going to work on time, taking the initiative to work overtime, doing things conscientiously, and so on. Attitude is self-determined, something you can control.

A conscientious and responsible attitude is something that leaders can easily find in a short period of time. Most of the work in the workplace is routine, and most people are willing to have a sense of presence in front of their leaders. So in daily work, the distinction between abilities is not obvious, but attitudes can be seen.

No one in the workplace can reach a high position based on ability alone. Competence can be cultivated, but attitude is a conscious act. From a management point of view, work attitude is conducive to management.

One might say that capable people are hard to manage.