Are the employees in the unit who dare to quarrel with the leader all employees with backgrounds?

No matter where we work, or in our interactions with family and friends, if we want to be respected by others, we must first learn to respect others. Even if others make mistakes, but after all, they are the person in charge of the factory, and they should respect others, because if something goes wrong, he will bear it, not my sister as an ordinary worker. If it weren't for good luck, even if my sister was a horse and didn't have the boss of the horse, she would have gone home to farm, instead of being promoted, and would have been in charge of the production workshop.

Therefore, I think that when dealing with people, we should also understand the mellowness. As the saying goes, people are in the eaves, how can they not bow their heads, and only by being harmonious can they gather wealth! Dare to quarrel with the leader to win people by courage and courage, this kind of person is straightforward, impatient, happy, dare to speak, dare to think, dare to do, upright, regardless of the consequences.

Moreover, there is background management and cornerstone, but the key is also to have a certain number of professional and technical personnel, have real skills, have a sense of responsibility, oil and salt do not advance, full of positive energy, not easy to compromise, selfless and fearless, the reason for the quarrel is reasonable, reasonable to go all over the world, unreasonable and difficult to move an inch.

In order to uphold fairness and fairness, or to allow the company to explain its own opinions, it has not been adopted, so it is necessary to make such a decision, so it is necessary to dare to quarrel with the leader to win people, based on the above reasons. If you want your subordinates not to argue with yourself and not to lose face to yourself, you must first ensure honesty and self-discipline and integrity. In that way, one's own faith is sufficient.

There is no disadvantage in being a leader in a private enterprise, not all of whom are omnipotent, not all of them, and they have a good grasp of the ominous technical professional level, and they do not express their opinions in front of the subordinates of the technical major, and listen more and learn more. In private enterprises, subordinates should not be too impulsive, take advantage of their own reasons, and do not lose face for their leading cadres.

It is not good to let the leading cadres go down the ladder, and it is not conducive to unity. Those who have a mine at home, or those who have been demolished, are not short of money, are arrogant, and naturally have the courage to quarrel with the leader. It's not in the system, it's a very large part of it, because it's not in the private sector, and I don't understand some of the standards in the system.

won people outside the system and quarreled with the leader, and the conclusion was nothing more than "there is no master here, you have a place to keep your master". Iron-headed baby, naturally there are very few such people. The last one is the type of Lao Fu I know, who is in a private company, but he is not afraid of offending people, not afraid of social death, not afraid of being isolated, and needs to stand up and fight with leading cadres when he encounters a bad atmosphere.

No, it's quite possible that these employees are just very brave and don't think that much about things when they do things, or they have been building up anger for too long.

Not all of them are employees with backgrounds, and some of them have the courage to quarrel with their bosses because of their own excellent abilities.

Yes, maybe the boss of the company is their relative, or they are the second generation of officials. Of course, it's not all, some are just young and vigorous, disobey the management of the leader, and turn against the leader on impulse.

In fact, the people who dare to quarrel with the leader in the unit, they must have made certain predictions and know what kind of result they will be after this. Many people are nothing more than targeted after quarreling with the leader, or they are directly dismissed, so they dare to quarrel with the leader, what is their mentality?

I think there must be many situations for people like this, some people dare to quarrel with the leader, because they have been patient for a long time, so they suddenly broke out at this time, they do not say that they were wronged for the first time, or that they were treated unfairly, and they quarreled directly with the leader. They also hope that through quarrels, they can express their emotions, and then let the leaders really pay attention to them, and quarreling in the unit can be said to not save face for the leaders at all. Because they've had enough, that's why they break the jar and break it, and it's just a quarrel with them.

There are also people who are more irritable in their personalities, and when they are treated unfairly, or when they are wronged, they will tell these things in time. Whether it is in life, in feelings, or even in work, it will not condone the unit's suppression of its own bottom line. This kind of personality may not be very good at work, but I think their personality is a better character in life, so that they will know how to protect themselves better.

It's not that they don't know the consequences when they quarrel with their leaders, but that they want to feel more comfortable than the consequences.

A leader is a person we must respect as employees, but if we quarrel with the leader in the unit, it will definitely make them change their opinion of us. I think that if you have the courage to quarrel with the leader, you must know in your heart what will happen to us after this. I think most people must be defending their rights when they quarrel with leaders, so at this time, their mentality is nothing more than wanting to protect themselves.

These people are all daring, especially brave, especially confident, and can speak out directly when they encounter unfair treatment, which is very just.

Generally, this kind of person is very confident, but also has a background, and is not afraid of leadership at all, and this kind of person's mentality is that if you can't do it here, you will change to a new job.

Because these people don't like to be squeezed in the workplace and maintain their inner balance, they dare to quarrel with the leader in the company.

Generally speaking, no subordinate is willing to have a conflict with the leader, tear his face, and make the contradiction public, which is not good for himself, unless he is ready to resign and quit, how to get along in the future? In these years, if you are not afraid of officials, you are afraid of management, and you are not worried about being excluded and suppressed? Quarrels with leaders are often forced to be helpless, and there is no room for mitigation under the Jedi counterattack, and those who dare to do so often have the following types of people:

One is people who are close to retirement. This is easy to understand, I'm going to retire anyway, why can't you stop me, why do you have to put up with you? Just do what you have to do, there's nothing to scruple about.

In our original bureau, there was a deputy section-level cadre who had always looked down on the principal leaders as unpleasant, but because of his status and status, he had to endure it, and it was not until he was about to retire that he questioned the principal leaders about violations of rules and discipline in front of the staff and staff of the whole situation, which made the principal leaders very embarrassed, but they were helpless.

The second is a person who has no desires and no desires. I don't have much hope for the workplace, I don't care if I look down on honor and disgrace, look down on fame and fortune, and reward me with my salary and benefits. If there is no desire, it is rigid, which makes these people not follow the leader's will in the workplace, blindly bend their minds to meet the leader, feel dissatisfied and dare to face the hard top, anyway, I don't care, the can is broken, what can you do with me?

As long as it's not a big problem, you can't drive me. If you open me, you have to weigh the consequences.

The third is people with professional expertise. Capable people tend to have a big temper and sharp edges, which mainly stems from their confidence in their own abilities and levels. In these years, it is not difficult to find a leader, but it may not be easy to find a professional who is capable and competent for the job, and this kind of person needs a long time to train and temper, not a short time can be replaced.

This scarcity also makes such people have a strong independence and autonomy in the face of leaders, dare to make their voices heard, and will not give in easily even if there is a quarrel. The leading cadres will also be polite to these people, coaxing them from time to time, and if they pick a son, they will not find anyone to replace them.

Fourth, there are people who have the backing behind them. There is a person in charge of a subordinate unit, and he is in charge of the leader in the conference room, and most people think it is incredible, is this guy kicked in the head by a donkey, how dare he do this?In fact, after an analysis, I learned that the person in charge of the subordinate unit is the confidant of the main leader, and the main leader and the leader in charge do not deal with each other very well, so the person in charge of the subordinate unit has never been interested in the leader in charge, and he will do it if he does it.

The end result was that he didn't have anything to do, and the leader in charge was communicated. If there is no strong support behind them, it is estimated that most people will not easily challenge the authority of the leader.

Fifth, part of the thorns. Each unit has more or less individual thorns, or because life is not going well, or because someone instigates it, or because of the upright personality, likes to stand out for righteousness, and works against the leader, which makes the leader a headache.

Maybe the personal ability is relatively strong, the business ability is relatively strong, and they don't particularly care about this job, so they naturally don't care about quarreling with each other.

From their own family conditions are relatively good, no mortgage, no car loan, no pressure, and they are particularly capable, which is the best confidence.

When a spring is overpressed, it will be **;People are the same, when a person is oppressed to a certain extent, the power of resistance may be greater.

The employees who dare to quarrel with the leader in the unit basically have some strength, but such people may not be liked by the leader, and there are two main reasons for this situation.

One, prickly employees.

Thorny employees, themselves will not obey the leader, everything is decided according to emotions, when you encounter something unhappy with yourself, don't care whether you are a leader or a boss, he dares to slap the table with you and quarrel with you. It's impossible for this kind of employee to mix well in the workplace.

Usually people who are seriously emotional, people who do not obey the management of the leader, are unlikely to mix well in the workplace, if the leader does not deal with you, it is a threat to their own power, so that no leader will give such employees a chance. Therefore, this kind of employee dares to quarrel with the leader, the confidence is his own emotions, and he can't control his own situation, others can't say anything about him, and his temper will be ignited as soon as he says it.

Second, for the benefit of the company.

Some employees quarrel with leaders for the good of the company. This kind of quarrel between employees and leaders is not emotional, nor for themselves, but for the benefit of the whole company. This kind of person is necessary for the company, as a leader also needs such employees, although the leader is not happy, but such a person, the leader must also use, to promote.

If you don't promote such a person, you will be surrounded by leaders who are patting on the back and not working well, then the company may lose money. In the end, it is the leaders themselves who are harmed. Bao Zheng was such a subordinate, and he was for the interests of the Great Song Dynasty, not for his personal interests, so although he had several disputes with the emperor, the emperor still wanted to appoint him and promote him.

You ask the employees in the unit who dare to quarrel with the leader, what is their confidence?

When encountering this kind of employees who dare to quarrel with the leader in the unit, they are generally people who are not good at mixing in the unit or are very good people, either relying on the leaders at home or the leaders are relatives of the company's senior management, in short, there is no way to take them.

Another is that he doesn't plan to do it here, or the unit doesn't plan to use him, but there is no way to fire him directly, so the unit tries to make it difficult for them, and if such a person doesn't get what he deserves, he won't leave by himself. Therefore, people like them are not afraid of heaven and earth.

The last kind of people are those who have very good technology and can dominate the company's performance in the company. Therefore, in general, such people, the leader will not embarrass them.

In short, you can eat anywhere if you have the ability.

Do you need confidence to quarrel with the leader in the unit? Want.

Will you be buried if you quarrel with the leader? No.

As long as you grasp the proportion, it is not a dream to quarrel with the leader to be promoted to the rank of knight, and a few principles are presented below.

The first one, quarreling with the leader, but; Don't quarrel with the leader; Quarrel with the leader for personal interests and die.

For example, if you have a meeting and talk about a project, you feel that there is a problem here, and you have to make it clear. A group of colleagues can't hold you, so you directly connect with the leader.

This is usually not a big problem. The more you lead, the closer the position is to the boss, in other words, you quarrel with him one, two, three, in case it is you right, you can do things better, he will definitely pay dividends and profit more than you, this kind of quarrel is to help him make money.

Just remember, in case it is refuted, you make the problem clear, the leadership does not support you, and this is the end. The most taboo grappling.

Indeed, some things are indeed wrong from your point of view, but the leader says that it is right, because it involves cross-departmental, and even what the boss has explained to him, he is inconvenient to tell you, so don't chase it.

To tell the truth, if you chase a girl and stalk you, everyone hangs yourself to show you, let alone the person who sends you money.

Too persistent, not a good thing, everything must be investigated to the bottom of the temper, every year annual leave is recommended to find a key Shen temple to live for a few days, let the monk break the ego for you.

The focus of the quarrel is on people, especially the people who are focused on and have interests with themselves, this kind of leadership, the leader did not deal with you at that time, it can only show that you still have use value.

Generally speaking, when the big head is the most annoying of this. You just say that whoever is inferior to you should be evaluated by you instead of him.

The brain wisdom shirt bag can't directly tell you that the person inside is his brother-in-law...... rightEnterprises take care of many people's affairs, and they all hide under the table to operate, don't mess with the leader to evaluate people, and don't quarrel with people. It's a long time coming.

Second, you can quarrel with the big leader, don't be angry with the small supervisor.

Employees in the enterprise quarrel with the leader, in the third person, it is a disguised questioning of the authoritative position of the management.

The smaller the supervisor, the lower the sense of security. A large group of tigers, leopards, jackals and wolves can replace themselves in minutes, and there are gods and Buddhas staring at him every day.

If this is planted, how can it be mixed??

So you can recall that if the company is squeezed away by wearing small shoes, eight out of ten are offended by small management. They don't have the authority to fire you directly, but they're pretty skilled at all kinds of debuffs.

But the big leader is different, it is not a hundred years before the big leader to hold a meeting in your department to cheer up, let everyone ask questions freely, and come out with a small employee to have a few words with the boss, it's okay.

The boss still thinks this little ghost is very cute!