Philosophical reflections on the development of science

The content of scientific development: adhere to the people-oriented, to achieve comprehensive social development, coordinated development, sustainable development.

According to the principle of historical materialism, the masses of the people create history. The masses of the people are the creators of material and spiritual wealth and the main body of social practice. Therefore, the core of the scientific outlook on development is people-oriented, that is, the all-round development of people and the fundamental interests of the broad masses of the people as the starting point and end point of work.

According to the principles of dialectical materialism and historical materialism, the relationship between man and nature is interactive and interrelated, and is the organic unity of dialectic. The natural environment accelerates or slows down the development of human society. If we do not consider this relationship when transforming the world, and focus on satisfying our own needs and not considering the tolerance of the natural environment, we will disrupt the balance of this system, we may eat our children and grandchildren, and our development will be unsustainable.

Therefore, in the process of development, it is necessary to take economic development as the center, and develop in the four aspects of economy, politics, culture, and society. That is, to achieve all-round development. This is also the unity of the contradictory two-point theory and the key theory.

The 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China once again emphasized the importance of scientific development, which is a wise policy decision made in view of China's national conditions and summing up the experience of the world's developed countries and their own countries for decades, and must be unswervingly implemented.

The two are complementary to each other, science is a kind of philosophy, philosophy can help people understand the development of science, but also can provide methods for the progress of scientific development, philosophy will follow the progress of science.

The relationship between the two is complementary, the development of philosophy and the development of science exist at the same time, philosophy has laid a certain foundation for us to have a certain knowledge and theory, so that we have a good sense of science, and the development of science has further promoted the perfection of philosophy.

It should be philosophy! Because philosophy is the thinking of thinking, the thinking of the laws of thinking, everything must be thought about, and thinking is by no means a random thing. There is a pattern, and this is what philosophy is most familiar with.

That's what philosophy does. For example, the law of opposites is the same, the law of contradictions!

The two are complementary to each other, because science needs to use philosophical thinking, logic, and judgment ability, and science can also improve a person's thinking ability and logical judgment ability.

Philosophy contains the theoretical system of all sciences, and also guides the development of specific science, philosophy is different from specific science, but it is also inseparable from specific science, I think it is philosophy that leads the development of science.

Philosophy gives birth to science, and science drives the development of philosophy, and the two complement each other and cannot be changed at any time.

Science in the heart, innovation in the hands, each person is an independent individual, the user's thoughts and wisdom are unique, in the usual cattle work, should always maintain a sense of science and technology, and actively participate in the daily scientific and technological activities to love science, learn science, use science, look for science around you, learn to use scientific methods to solve problems in life, continue to learn scientific knowledge, cultivate scientific spirit, establish scientific ideals, master scientific methods, improve scientific literacy, so that life is scientific everywhere.

Concrete science is the foundation of philosophy, and concrete science drives the progress of philosophy.

For example, Aristotle believed that the earth is in the center and the sun revolves around the earth, and later the Catholic Church also believed in this statement, but Copernicus's "Theory of the Movement of the Heavenly Bodies" put forward an objection, and now we study philosophy will not restore Aristotle's ideas, and the specific philosophy of understanding is too vague to be operational.

Summary. Non-scientific philosophy, we generally do not call it philosophy, philosophy is the study of better wisdom that guides people's lives, and philosophy in this sentence refers to the philosophy of science.

Philosophy is the science of better wisdom that guides people's lives, why is it right? Because I have also studied philosophy, there is a distinction between scientific early Zen and non-scientific Li manuscript learning, how can unscientific philosophy guide people's lives better?

In the textbook, he told Li that Marxist philosophy is the philosophy of science, but other philosophies other than Marxist philosophy also have the role of guiding people to better understand the world and transform the world, such as Newton's discovery of the law of gravitation under the guidance of his self-created materialism when he was young. Non-scientific philosophies can lead us astray Only scientific philosophies can lead us to a better life.

So that's it! Thank you!

You're welcome. That, the sentence "Philosophy is the study of better wisdom that guides people's lives" is also not true, isn't the philosophy of non-science and omission not philosophy? If it does, doesn't this sentence also imply that non-scientific philosophy can also guide people's lives to better wisdom and wisdom.

Non-scientific philosophy, we generally do not call it philosophy, philosophy is the study of better wisdom that guides people's lives, and philosophy in this sentence refers to the philosophy of science.

You're welcome, if only I could help you.

Yes, I guess this refers to Marxist philosophy.

Philosophy is probably the way in which human beings understand nature, so it is divided into two types: main vipassana and objective; Appearance.

Whereas science is a reproducible objective law, so philosophy includes science.

From the perspective of Western academic history, science is a derivative of philosophy. Later, science became an independent discipline in parallel with philosophy. Science and philosophy have an interactive relationship.

Science produces knowledge, and philosophy produces ideas. Marxism believes that philosophy is also a social ideology. In modern Western philosophy, there is the philosophy of science, which is the study of theories about science.

This theory studies the history of science and summarizes many theoretical models for science, but it only explains science, not guides science.