-
On the whole, it should be the performance of the Tiger tank. The Soviet Union's machinery manufacturing industry is simply not comparable to Germany, and in terms of data, it seems that the Stalinist style is strong, but in combat it is inferior to the Tiger tank.
-
The IS-1 is a confrontational heavy tank developed by the Soviet Union for the Tiger 1, and its performance is naturally stronger than that of the Tiger 1.
As a result, the design was inhumane, and the capabilities of Soviet tank crews were often inferior to the Tiger 1 in battle.
-
The possibility of the Tiger tank winning is great. The IS-1 was bulky, and the 85mm cannon wanted to destroy the Tiger Tanzhi
Gram is very laborious. Tiger tank ratio.
The internal IS-1 is flexible, and its rate of fire, visual range, and accuracy are stronger than those of the IS-1.
Not to mention the IS-1, even the IS-2, which is equipped with a 122mm cannon, has to rely on luck if it wants to defeat the Tiger tank. The IS-2 replaced the IS-1's 85mm gun with a more powerful but bulky 122mm cannon, and nothing else changed.
-
The Tiger is very large, and the Soviet IS1 is only capable of fighting it with artillery.
Make some small threats! To put it simply, the upgraded T34 became a heavy tank, and only upgraded artillery to deal with the emergency products of the German Tiger and Leopard, sacrificing mobility and armor. It is difficult to parry in front of the tiger and leopard pose.
Only then will the improved IS2 have the ability to compete with the Tiger and Leopard.
-
Are you talking about World of Tanks, or the real World of Tanks! In World War II, only IS-2 won against the Tigers, and IS could only pose a threat to the Tigers.
-
The Tiger series, including the King Tiger, is a famous heavy tank in World War II. Among them, the 88 tank gun is the most powerful armor-piercing artillery in World War II, with great power, and the overall summary is that firepower is the supremacy, protection is second, and maneuverability is the worst.
The IS2 series is mainly composed of IS2 and IS3, IS2 is a heavy tank that has been widely fought with the German army in World War II, using 122 large-caliber guns, strong firepower, excellent protection (inclined armor), poor speed (but a little stronger than the German army), poor sustained ability, and only 38 rounds of ammunition in reserve.
Generally speaking, the Tiger tank and IS2 belong to a heavyweight class, and they are equal in terms of performance, but in terms of output, IS2 is significantly larger than that of the German tank, but due to the inferior quality of personnel and equipment, the quantitative advantage of IS2 is equal to that of the Tiger tank.
The King Tiger tank should belong to the same level as the IS3, but the two sides did not fight each other in World War II, so we can only look at the performance comparison of the two, and the armor-piercing ability of the King Tiger 88 gun is significantly higher than that of the 122 gun, so the firepower is slightly higher than that of the Soviet tank. The improvement of IS3 is obviously in terms of protection, and the post-war evaluation of the West is the product of 10 years ahead of the West. From a comprehensive point of view, IS3 is comparable compared to King Tiger.
Therefore, the IS-1 as a prototype against the Tiger tank, in terms of performance is lower than the Tiger in the same period, if the Tiger tank vs IS-1, under the same single-vehicle confrontation, the Tiger tank wins, after all, the quality is there. But if on the real battlefield, the German tiger and leopard are entangled, after all, the Soviet army's tank production is terrible.
-
Are you asking about games or reality? It's hard to say in reality, the tiger can wear it, and the IS can wear it, it depends on whether the car group is skilled. World of Tanks games are going to win to a large extent!
-
Dude: You can't choose that. Because these 2 are all over-cars. Whether you want to see the final car 100 or IS7 depends on your hobbies.
But I've played with these 2 cars, and to be honest, I play IS3 and I think Tiger King is meat and I think IS3 is meat when I play Tiger King, hehe.
-
If you like the top front, choose IS3, IS3 is faster than King Tiger, the turret armor is better than King Tiger regardless of thickness or angle, it can block a lot of small shells, plus the caliber of the gun is large, the instantaneous output is 50% higher than that of King Tiger, one of the main problems is that the hull armor is too thin, although the angle is very good, but because it is thin, there are many guns that can penetrate it.
Although the Tiger King is slow, the blood is thick, and the body armor is relatively thick, except for the bottom of the hull and the observation cover, the entire frontal defense is relatively constant, and the defense is better than IS3 at long distances, and the artillery accuracy is very high, which is very suitable for black guns.
So it mainly depends on the preferences of the landlord.,Love is slowly output in the back.,Definitely choose the Tiger King.,I like to smoke someone's face in front of the person opposite.,Or is3.。
-
The IS-3 has a high speed, a high rate of armored jumping eggs, and fierce firepower, but the Tiger King hits accurately, has average mobility, good frontal protection, and slightly inferior lethality.
-
King Tiger, not only the turret rotates freely, the body can rotate itself, and the high "concentration" armor makes the small medium tank hit the egg pain. The maximum turning angle is 25 °, which is more than 3 ° more than the IS-3, and the maximum speed is also faster than that of the IS-3.
-
I've never played Tiger King when I played -3, and I didn't dare to go head-to-head with Tiger King before, it's not easy to fight. Generally, when I am the squad leader, I rely on artillery and black guns to deal with the Tiger King. Now that I know the weakness of the Tiger King, it is easy to fight, and the observation hole is not easy to play, and it is generally solved by about 25% of the car cover and 4 guns.
I had a good time playing in my town. The damage high point of -3 on the trolley is certain.
-
If you say that the late stage is still playing, it is 3 Now the Su system is very rebellious, if it is just these 2 cars, the Tiger King will be better.
-
You just have to remember that this is Maozi's game, and of course, you can choose whichever car you like.
-
The IS3 cannon is well-armored, fast, and there are many vibrators.
-
nonononononononono!There are two models of Tiger Style: Tiger 1 and Tiger 2, which is often referred to as the Tiger King.
The King Tiger frontal armor has a 160mm 60-degree angle, which makes it as protective as a 180mm main ** 88mm 76 times caliber gun.
The Tiger frontal armor has a 100mm 90-degree bevel to give it only 100mm protection power, and the main ** is an 88mm 46 times caliber gun.
The IS-2 frontal armor has a 120mm 35-degree angle, giving it the same protection as 165mm!! Main** 120mm ? Double-caliber artillery.
It is obvious that the Tiger is no match for the IS-2!! The Tiger King is stronger than the IS-2 but the cost performance is too low!!
For example, in the Battle of the Ardennes, the Tiger King fought his way for Germany, but most of the Tiger Kings broke down or fell behind due to mechanical problems, and did not play any role!!
More than 3,000 IS-2 units were produced during World War II, more than the Tiger series combined...
Leopard Tank: 90mm frontal armor with a 30-degree angled angle gives it the equivalent of 150mm of protection!! Stronger than the Tiger !!
Main** 76mm ? The double-caliber gun can penetrate 121mm armor at 1000 meters, while the main gun of the Tiger can penetrate 120mm, and the penetration is comparable, and the price-performance Leopard is stronger than the Tiger!! If Germany had spent all its Tiger resources on the Leopard in World War II, the situation would have been much more optimistic!!
The Leopard was awarded the best tank of World War II in terms of vitality, protection, and mobility.
The only thing that can be compared to it is the T-34 Type 85!!
If a tank duel is held, the Leopard is undoubtedly stronger, but if you want to win a war, the T34 85 is undoubtedly the best option (cost-effective).
Final ranking: King Tiger IS-2 Tiger Leopard T34 85
Value for money T34 85 Leopard IS-2 Tiger King Tiger.
-
The distance is long, and it is difficult for the 88mm gun of the Tiger tank to destroy the heavy armor of the IS-2, and it is easier for the 122mm gun of the IS-2 to destroy the Tiger tank. But the Tiger tank has better vision, rate of fire and accuracy than the IS-2. The IS-2 also does not guarantee the destruction of the Tiger tank with one shot.
So the odds are pretty much the same.
The distance is close, and the advantage of the Tiger tank comes. The Tiger tank was more agile than the IS-2 and had a better rate of fire and accuracy than the IS-2 (the rate of fire was not on the same level). Although the IS-2 is more powerful, it is slow to reload, resulting in a slow rate of fire, and there is no way, the shells of the 122mm gun are too big and stupid.
And the IS-2 shells had to be adjusted to the level. It feels like IS-2 is big and dumb.
The Tiger tank may not be able to gnaw the IS-2 at a long distance, but the distance is close, and it is no problem to hang the IS-2. If the IS-2 wants to fight the Tiger tank, it must keep a distance from the Tiger tank, otherwise it will only be beaten.
-
Tiger, at a distance of 1000 meters, penetrated the Stalin 2 tank, while the Stalin 2 could not.
-
I don't look down on Stalin at all with the Tiger pose2
M1A1 is even more powerful.
m1a1 parameter. >>>More
Of course, it is closer to 1, because 1 is equal to 1, and it cannot be said to be close.
<> Challenger 1 tank.
Challenger 2 tank. >>>More
It's the same thing. This is often referred to as n1.
Japanese Language Proficiency Test: >>>More
From the perspective of appearance, BMW X1 is very fashionable, while Encore has lengthened the front proportion, and the body as a whole looks more atmospheric, both of which can basically meet the needs of multiple scenesIf you pursue brand reliability, you advocate the choice of BMW X1, and if you pursue cost-effectiveness, you advocate the choice of Envision S. >>>More