What should I do if I am asked to introduce my strengths and weaknesses in the interview of a public

When faced with questions about strengths and weaknesses, the advantages must try to rely on the qualities recognized by the mainstream society: such as optimistic, cheerful, positive, strong logical ability, fast response ability, etc. These also help employers choose admissions.

After all, when public institutions recruit people, they need to recruit a person with strong work ability and good character, not for fun. As for the shortcomings, you can pick out some harmless small shortcomings, such as more love of food and so on. Small shortcomings don't have much of an impact.

Calm, organized, determined, tenacious, helpful and caring for others, adaptable and humorous, optimistic and friendly. I have gone through one to two years of training and project practice in xx, plus...

There may be some situations where it is enough to be euphemistic, not so straightforward. You can say something like:

1. What is my name and what major I studied in college (now the interview is fair, and the interviewer is generally not asked to tell where you are from, what school you graduated from, etc.); (Simply bring it, except for your own name to be clearly stated).

2. When it comes to my strengths and weaknesses, I think my biggest advantages are: I am more serious in studying, more serious and careful in my work, more attention to details, etc.; (Be confident in your humility).

3. I feel that my shortcomings are that there are still deficiencies in hands-on operation ability, which needs to be strengthened.

The reason why I applied for your company is mainly due to the following three considerations:

First, I am about to graduate, and I need to find a suitable job for the sake of life.

Second, your company wants to recruit graduates in related majors, and I feel that I meet the recruitment requirements of your organization, so I come to your company to apply;

Thirdly, I think the work of your unit is more suitable for my own ideas, I like the relatively stable environment of your unit, and at the same time, in your unit, I can give full play to my strengths, and your unit can give me room for growth.

Answered. In the interview, you must appear mature, steady, and affable in your speech and demeanor.

In addition, in terms of language, don't talk big, false, or empty words, and seek truth from facts. Of course, seeking truth from facts is not the same as going straight to the point, and when it comes to some issues, learn to express them tactfully.

In the interview of public institutions, it may be presented that the examiner asks the candidate to talk about his strengths or defects, and today we will talk about the answering skills of the strengths and defects title.

First, we must seek truth from facts.

When we reply to our own strengths and weaknesses, we must be based on reality, seek truth from facts, and do not make things up. For example, if you are a very cheerful person, if you are not good at communication, then anyone can see that you are lying. When participating in the interview of public institutions, we should answer the excellent and defective questions from life, and do appropriate processing, which is higher than life.

That is to say, when we say that we have defects, we should combine them with the position we are applying for, and the defects should be harmless and do not affect the homework. Candidates should have a good grasp of the time to answer the questions.

2. Prepare the right case.

When we answer what my strengths are, we can't just say what my strengths are, but also have appropriate cases to prove them. For example, if you say that your strength is good at communication, then you have to prove your strength to the examiner, and then you need to give an example in life that can show that you have good communication skills.

3. The answers should be concise and concise.

In the interview of the public institution, when it comes to our strengths, in order to leave a good impression on the examiner, many students list their strengths as much as possible. In fact, when we participate in the interview of public institutions, the more strengths the better, but your strengths just match the position you are applying for. For example, if your position is at the bottom and you often need to communicate with people, then of course your strengths should be good at communication, playing the piano, drawing, singing and dancing, all of which are useless.

Therefore, when we reply to our strengths, we must be quintive.

Fourth, look forward to the future.

After talking about our advantages and disadvantages, we should look forward to the future. Let's talk about how to make better use of strengths in daily life, and how to improve defects after work. You can also use your strengths to correct your defects, or you can also tell the examiner about your hidden strengths of being strict with yourself after you have realized your defects and are trying your best to correct them in the future, so that you can also tell the examiner from the side that you are strict with yourself.

People are self-aware." Whether a person's perception of himself or not can reflect authenticity, accuracy, objectivity, and comprehensiveness is an important factor in the embodiment of quality and ability.

In the evaluation of yourself, you must first fully affirm yourself, so that you can fully highlight your competitiveness and competitive advantage, and also give the examiners a good impression of firmness and self-confidence. However, it is important to keep in mind:

Be true and not false in your self-evaluation. Examiners are generally experts in human resources. Before or during the interview, the information you have can basically summarize the characteristics of the candidate's abilities.

If a test taker ignores this and rhetoric in order to reach their job search goals, it can be counterproductive. In any interview, character traits are the most important thing for examiners. If the authenticity is lost, the test taker's efforts will not achieve the desired results.

In evaluating yourself, you should pay attention to the use of non-verbal communication skills, and the main thing is to distinguish between affirmation and showing off. It is impossible for people to have no shortcomings, and when talking about shortcomings, they should summarize and concentrate, do not appear too many shortcomings and describe themselves, and deny themselves too much, which is obviously modest, and will also affect the judgment of the examiner. When talking about shortcomings, in addition to explaining that the shortcomings are now clearly recognized, it is necessary to show that there is confidence and methods to change the shortcomings.

In your evaluation of yourself, don't talk in generalities, it's better to explain the problem with facts.

First, there should be appropriate examples. For example, when you ask questions about your strengths, let's not be simple, just two words, my strength is optimistic, my advantage is positive. Because if it's just a few words, the examiner can't really get to know you and get to know you.

Therefore, we should have appropriate examples to demonstrate, for example, when our strengths are optimistic, we can talk about examples in our daily work and life to verify them. in order to deepen the examiner's impression of you.

The second point is simplicity and refinement. When we have what our own strengths are, many students will gush about their strengths when they think of them, I have ten strengths, and I have five. In fact, when we talk about our own advantages, it is not about how many advantages we say, but about the key to it, which can be clearly explained and matched with the position, which is the best.

For example, the position requires you to be brave and persevering, then if what you say has nothing to do with it, I am good at playing basketball, good at singing, good at dancing, although this advantage is also your advantage, but it is not particularly matched with the position, so this kind of answer is not the best answer.

Third, look to the future. When we have advantages and disadvantages, we should not only briefly talk about what the advantages are, but also what the disadvantages are and explain them simply. We should talk more about how to do it in the future.

When talking about advantages, we can talk about how to give full play to our advantages in the future to better integrate into the new work and adapt to the new position. When talking about shortcomings, you can also talk about how to correct them in the future.

Fourth, proceed from reality and seek truth from facts. In fact, answering questions is also a kind of art, and there is a saying that art comes from life and is higher than life. The first half of the sentence refers to life, which shows that when we talk about our strengths and weaknesses when answering questions, we should try not to make them up, and we should say something with personal characteristics according to our actual situation.

Some people look like a very cheerful person, and then they say that their weakness is introversion, so that the examiner can see at a glance that this person is lying, which is not good for your interview. So we ask for it to come from life. What does the second half of this sentence mean when it says that it is higher than life?

For example, some people's shortcomings may be timid, but the post they are examining is also the post of the people's police. Then I suggest not to talk about the disadvantage of timidity, because it is contrary to the characteristics required by the position. We can appropriately replace it with one other disadvantage.

Introducing your strengths and weaknesses in the interview of public institutions is a common type of question, through self-introduction, the examiner has a preliminary impression of you, and even decisive. When candidates introduce their own advantages, they regard themselves as cost post workers, restore the scene, and introduce the advantages from the perspective of the position.

Candidates can introduce their shortcomings from aspects that are not related to the position they are applying for, such as positive, honest and trustworthy aspects. Suppose you, as a staff member, must focus on work, show the interviewer your highlights, and express how you can overcome and improve your shortcomings in your work and do your job better.

Interview with a public institution, introduce your shortcomings, and how to add points.

Introducing your strengths and weaknesses is a common question in interviews, and the interviewer's starting point is to test the interviewee's suitability for the position. When we introduce our own advantages, we treat ourselves as cost post workers, restore the scene, and introduce the advantages from the perspective of our own position.

Introduce your own shortcomings, which can be introduced from aspects that are not related to the position, sunny and positive, because you, as a staff member, should focus on work. Highlight your highlights to the interviewer and express how you can overcome and improve your shortcomings in your work and do your job better.

It varies from person to person, and the advantages are relatively easy to say, such as being responsible, sincere, creative, etc., but don't exaggerate. When you talk about your shortcomings, don't really expose your shortcomings, and find a way to talk about your shortcomings, such as my lack of fashion, going online is nothing more than checking information, reading information, and not loving to play games. Similar ones can be summarized more.

If you have advantages, you can talk about your actual situation, such as strong learning ability and high communication efficiency.

If you have shortcomings, you can tell me that you have no experience and need to learn a lot.

Tell the truth, especially the shortcomings, don't think about being opportunistic and deceiving the examiner. Advantages and disadvantages are all self-awareness, you can prepare in advance, and when you really encounter this kind of question, you can answer it directly.

When introducing yourself, you should face up to your own strengths and weaknesses, try to introduce your own advantages as much as possible, talk less about some shortcomings, and have characteristics and logic in language introduction.

Introduce yourself from your professional strengths, especially internships related to your major, which not only emphasizes your professional strengths. It can also show that the ability has met the requirements.

The advantages and disadvantages of the interview are often asked, we talk more about the advantages when we are talking, and the disadvantages should be said to have nothing to do with the position you are applying for, let alone hard injuries, and you should prepare in advance.

The advantages can be said to be strong in working under pressure and strong communication skills, and then explain them.

The disadvantages can be said to be inexperienced, and sometimes too much attention to detail.

Summary. In fact, this problem itself is a "pit", because shortcomings are shortcomings no matter what, and they all point to the bad aspects of people. So, if you want to talk about your shortcomings, it's impossible.

The reason why the interviewer asks this question is not to really want to know what your shortcomings are, but to judge your thinking ability, logical ability, expression ability, etc. through yours.

In fact, this problem itself is a "pit", and Xianshan's shortcomings are shortcomings anyway, and they all point to the bad side of people. So, if you want to talk about your shortcomings, it's impossible. The reason why the interviewer asks this question is not really to know what your shortcomings are, but to judge your thinking ability, logical ability, expression ability, etc.

1. Try to talk about the shortcomings of knowledge and skills, and less about the shortcomings of personality and personality.

2. Try to talk about the shortcomings caused by objective reasons, and less about the shortcomings caused by subjective reasons.

3. Try to explain with dialectical thinking, and do not label yourself directly.

During the interview, of course, you have to talk about the advantages of your application, if you don't say that others don't know, you will add more points for your application. In this era, you can't be a subtle person, you have to be a low-key person, and you have to do things in a high-profile manner, and it is very important to sell yourself, not only to sell the advantages you have to apply, but also to sell other advantages that you have, so that the probability of you being hired will be relatively high. While most interviewers already have a candidate's CV on hand, they will ask the candidate to introduce themselves.

Because this question is not only a good opening statement, but also an opportunity to examine the candidate's language skills, adaptability, psychological endurance and logical thinking ability.

The purpose of the interview is to fully demonstrate your strengths and impress the other person. In this way, you can stand out from the crowd of applicants. The recommended strategy is to "attack one point, not the rest".

Specifically, according to the requirements of the position you are applying for, show your strongest part in matching the job requirements, highlight it and give examples to explain it in detail. Anyone who has done PPT or studied photography knows that when doing PPT, there is a requirement in the layout design, called "blank", that is to say, the elements on the entire layout should not be too much and too full, and some blank areas should be appropriately left; The same is true of photography, photography itself is an art of "subtraction", when composing, we must strive to remove the superfluous elements in the **.

The interviewer has to interview so many people every day, and the self-introduction is the same, and if you read the basic information on the resume directly to the other person, it will be unattractive. What's more, when the other party listens to you introduce yourself, they are looking at the basic information on your resume, and if you read it to him in the same way, it will make him feel like listening to a repeater. The main reason is that the interviewer asks you to introduce yourself to quickly identify whether you have an advantage that meets the requirements of the position, and if not, you don't want to waste too much time.

That's why when introducing yourself, be sure to highlight your strengths that meet the requirements of the position.