-
There's nothing wrong with that. Everyone has the right to have children, in other words, everyone also has the right not to have children, as long as it does not interfere with others, does not violate the boundaries of morality and law, and there is nothing wrong with not having children.
1. Why do some people not want to have children?
Now more and more people don't want to have children, so why do so many people not want to have children? There are three main points: economic, physical, and psychological.
The economic reason is actually very simple, that is, because many young people can't afford to buy a house, can't afford a car, and can't make their lives better, they are struggling to make ends meet all day long, so they don't want to have a child to suffer with themselves, so they don't want to have children.
Most of the people who choose not to have children because of physical reasons are because they have physical problems, and if they have children, it may cause a lifelong drag on the children.
There are also some people who feel that they cannot take on the responsibility of raising children, because of poverty, lack of ability, poor life, etc., they have lost their confidence in life, and naturally they dare not let their children face all this.
2. What kind of behavior is responsible for children?
If a person is particularly poor, so poor that he can barely support himself and can hardly see the future, then if he chooses to have children, he is actually irresponsible for the children. Because he can't guarantee that his children will have the money to invest in their bodies, education, and minds.
Maybe the child he gave birth to will not be able to go to school for the rest of his life, so he can only reluctantly work in the factory, 3,000 yuan a month, until he is too old and unemployed.
Is it really responsible to let children live such a life? The real responsibility should be to let the children have a better growth environment, at present, many people do not have such an environment, so many people are reluctant to have children.
It's not that they are not responsible for their children, but they happen to be too responsible for their children, so they don't want their children to bear such a difficult life.
3. Ordinary people have the right not to have children
Ordinary people actually have the right not to have children, just as ordinary people have the right to choose their own life. Even if the act of not having children is not recognized, I think that as long as I recognize my behavior and stick to it, it is fine.
-
Of course, there is nothing wrong with it, because the right to have a child lies with yourself, you can give birth if you want to, and you don't want to give birth if you don't want to, so as long as you are happy.
-
There is nothing wrong with not having children, but it must be done with the consent of both parties, otherwise there will be many conflicts.
-
Whether you get married or not, whether you have children or not, this is your own decision, and your life is of course your own choice. Of course, don't regret your choice. Because regret is useless.
This life is lived only for oneself. The writer said that he is 33 years old, unmarried, has no children, still stupidly pursues love, and can no longer live an ordinary life.
She wasn't sure what she was afraid of marriage and what she wanted, so she didn't get married. She also said that she did not like children and was old and pregnant before marriage.
It's not good, so I didn't have children. She went to the Northeast because of love, so many people persuaded her not to marry far away. A lot of things will be different when you get married. Especially after having a child, the child can become a responsibility and a stumbling block.
She herself attributed it to the admonition of these people. The child becomes the dominant or indispensable factor for all family factors. She thought.
If all this is without children, can we women live more freely, more independently, and happier? She advises many people to move to a better city for their children in the future, even if they don't think about themselves.
She thinks this way herself, for the sake of being small, I have been working hard to make money, save money, and take the lead no matter what choice I make. I'm not going to do that. I want to live only for my heart in this life.
In the end, she said frankly. I'll always be my mom's baby, but I don't want to be someone else's mom. Everything is so beautiful now, although I am not rich, I don't have to worry about food and clothing.
If a child comes at this time, it is undoubtedly to break this beauty. In the future, I will run for him for the rest of my life, and I will take the lead in doing things. I really don't want to do that.
I just want to live my life with peace of mind and spend her life with my mom.
The netizen who supported her said that she thought very clearly, because having a child has no ego and is a one-way street, so if you don't regret it, you can't regret it. Because you can only be responsible for your children, and without children, your life will definitely be more self-conscious and free. Don't have children anyway, no problem!
Some netizens also suggested not to think so much. If you really have a child, you will find that the child is still very cute, and it is also a kind of happiness to watch him grow up little by little. Give birth to a miniature version of you or the person you love, the wing, the crow.
You'll love it. Children will not be a stumbling block.
-
Reasonable, because I don't like children in the first place, why should I give birth to them, it's not good for children to be born like this, and I don't like them either, so it's better not to have children directly.
-
is very reasonable. Because some people really don't like children, there is no need to have children, which is also a kind of responsibility for children.
-
It is unreasonable, because whether to have children or not is a matter of three families, not two husband and wife, and both parents should be taken into account when doing things, and don't just think about yourself.
-
It is reasonable that the child is the crystallization of love, born under the expectation of the parents. Neither husband nor wife like children, and they are not sure if they can raise children well, they can choose not to have children, because they don't want to hurt an innocent little life.
-
I don't think that's reasonable, that's not right. Having small children at home can add a lot of joy to you. When you actually have children of your own, you don't think that way.
-
If a person doesn't like children, it is more reasonable to not have children, because everyone chooses different lifestyles and has their own free choice rights, so not having children is also their own right to choose.
-
It's not an unreasonable question, I don't like that children may be under a certain age and that the children belong to someone else's family. If you have your own child, you will naturally like it.
-
Not getting married and not having children is not directly related to being irresponsible, but if you can't give your other half feelings after marriage, you can't raise your children well, and it's irresponsible to give birth to and not raise, and marriage without caring is irresponsible. There are indeed many choices in life, maybe you don't want to get married and don't want to have children at the current moment, but it is also your current choice of your own ability, but it is irresponsible to get married hastily.
When you decide to have a child, you need to take on the child's parenting and education work, you need to face the responsibility and pressure brought by the family and the child, if you are not good at facing such a responsibility is irresponsible, you must have a child is your own decision.
When you decide to get married, it means that you are willing to support each other with your other half to form a family, you should make your own efforts for the family, if you just get married because you are urged out, or just want others to expect to get married, or after marriage to treat your other half coldly, this is irresponsible, because you have not taken on the responsibility of two people to form a new family.
There are billions of people in this world, and there are actually many different ideas and opinions. At this moment, whether you want to get married or want to have children, you should make a careful decision, and you must get married and give birth to a responsibility, if you are not ready to enter such a stage of life hastily is irresponsible.
Life is really long, longer than you think, if you decide not to get married, then in fact, you will face a lot of loneliness and stereotypes in the future, but society is progressing and gradually accommodating. And it is actually difficult for you to make this decision at some point in the future, because love sometimes comes very suddenly, and sometimes the change of opinion comes very suddenly.
Giving birth to a child is the same, when you want a child, you need to know the responsibilities and pressures you face, you have to provide the child with a nurturing environment, not only money but also spiritual training, because the child's growth is inseparable from the care and guidance of parents, and it is irresponsible to give birth and not raise.
Sometimes there are always some different concepts in society, but whether to be responsible or not is not something that a person can decide, because life is indeed not only your own life, you have to face the pressure of life, the pressure of the family, the pressure of society, when making every decision, look at the longer, do not limit your every future, the road is still very long. Only by thinking clearly can we avoid irresponsibility, and it is irresponsible to ourselves and others to follow the steps randomly.
You should be cautious when making every choice. Whether to get married or to have children or not is your own choice, but the choice of the present and the choice of the future are not necessarily the same, life must be very long, and it is difficult for you to decide your future thoughts and concepts, so you might as well be tolerant of yourself and others.
-
Not getting married and not having children is not an expression of irresponsibility, on the contrary, it is a sign of responsibility for oneself, because they do not force themselves and do not affect others. If the two conditions of not getting married and not having children are valid at the same time, it only represents a person's self-choice of marriage, and in my opinion, it is not irresponsible. But if it's alone, I think it's irresponsible.
If a person wants to get married just because they don't have children, I think it's irresponsible in a way. Of course, excluding my own physical reasons, I think that after getting married, if it is not a special reason, I should have children. If you don't have children, this kind of marriage is actually not very solid in foundation, the stability is very poor, and if you don't want children, marriage is not necessary, two people are together because they like it, and they are separated if they don't like it, because they don't want children, they don't need to bind each other with marriage.
If you get married and don't want children, this kind of irresponsibility is irresponsible to the family.
There is also a situation where you want to have children without getting married, which is also a manifestation of irresponsibility. Because they only selfishly consider their own feelings of wanting children, but do not consider the difficulties of children growing up in an unsound family, their irresponsibility is irresponsible for their own children.
Not getting married and not having children does not affect anyone's interests, nor does it affect the family, nor does it affect future generations, it is just a kind of self-choice, which in my opinion has nothing to do with irresponsibility.
-
Is not getting married and not having children a sign of irresponsibility? With the progress of modern concepts and the development of the idea of equality between men and women, women no longer regard marriage and family as the most important pursuit of life, but begin to pursue their own growth and the development of the workplace. Having children often limits women's career advancement, so many women give up childbearing and focus on career development.
Secondly, it is more empathetic for women who have children, giving birth to children is no longer like before, just giving birth, in today's society, raising a child requires a lot of manpower, financial resources and energy.
Most of the modern parents pursue the elite model of education, and children from an early age in addition to school homework, but also to receive after-school tutoring, talent training, which not only requires a lot of money but also requires parents to invest a lot of energy.
For mothers of dual-income families, it is extremely difficult to balance work and family. Therefore, many women believe that they cannot provide a wealthy family and a healthy and happy growth environment for their children, so they prefer not to have children.
However, there are also many women who are only temporarily infertile from marriage. This is especially true for women who are reluctant to have children due to financial and energy reasons. They often choose to have children after they have a successful career and are financially prosperous.
Therefore, not getting married and not having children cannot be used as a one-sided reason to judge whether a woman is responsible, or even selfish. If you look closely, it may be more obvious that it is responsible for itself and for its children.
As for the responsibility and obligation to raise a child, it should not only rely on the responsibility of the mother, but pay more attention to the responsibility and obligation of men and women to raise together. In this way, coupled with the joint efforts of both parties, to create a better growth environment for the baby who is about to come around, perhaps, giving birth to a child is no longer so "terrible".
-
I don't think this statement is true, children are the crystallization of their parents' happiness.
Raising the fertility rate now depends to a large extent on the ways and policies that encourage childbearing. However, how to encourage children is by no means to promote children as long-term "consumer goods". Every child is an independent individual, and they should be cultivated in the process of growing up with a sound personality, and in the process of the child's growth, the parents also grow together, and the relationship between the two parties should be mutually fulfilling.
Relevant departments should find ways to reduce housing prices, prices, and medical expenses, reduce the cost of childbirth, education, and parenting for children, fully incorporate the cost of childbirth into social security, and issue birth subsidies, so that the burden of having and raising children can be smaller, and the pressure and burden of young people can be reduced, which may be the best solution to increase the fertility rate.
In any case, on the issue of fertility, the data of birth, old age, sickness and death cannot be used as a moral kidnapping of young people. The so-called experts do not really understand the attitude of young people towards marriage and childbearing, understand their anxieties, and really solve their problems, but have an arrogant attitude, saying that "it is not right not to have children", and even began to calculate the cost of payment and return for young models, trying to turn childbirth into an investment and materialize children into consumer goods. This kind of behavior will only cause greater dissatisfaction among young people and will be counterproductive to increase fertility.
We hope that the experts can restore their credibility, and in the future, they can put forward more truly effective policies to encourage childbirth, establish a gender-equal and childbirth-friendly social support system, improve the male paternity leave system, encourage men to participate in childcare, and strengthen the social compensation for women's reproductive value, enhance women's maternity benefits, and protect women's rights and interests in fair employment. Only in this way can we truly improve the happiness of people's lives and increase the fertility rate.
Don't you have an idea of your own? Now there are a lot of "Dink people" in society, and few people can say whether this is right or not to have children, but one thing is certain, China is moving towards old age, and a family without children must be an incomplete family, the problem of children in the later stage is not the problem of children, but the problem of parents, children grow up and are not filial, why is this? A child's first teacher is his parents, and if you educate him properly, then it can only be a happier and happier family, and you and your husband will truly appreciate the place and value of this life! >>>More
This statement needs to be evaluated from multiple perspectives. First of all, as an economic concept, there is some truth in treating children as long-term durable consumer goods. Because children are not only the productivity and human resources of the family, but also bring emotional and cultural heritage to the family, with a long lifespan and importance. >>>More
It is okay not to have children, China's law does not clearly stipulate that couples must have children, and everyone has the right to choose whether to have children or not to have children. The reproductive rights of citizens are a basic human right, and the reproductive rights of citizens are inherent and occur before the state and the law. >>>More
Many things are always understood after experience, just like feelings. After the pain, you will know how to protect yourself; After being stupid, we will know how to persist and give up in a timely manner, and we will slowly understand ourselves in the process of gaining and losing. In fact, life does not need such meaningless attachments, and nothing really cannot be parted. >>>More
The reason why we have children is to wait for us to be old and have someone to take care of us. >>>More