The memory is used as the hard disk cache, and the win7 memory is used as the hard disk cache

Memory is meant to be used as a cache for computer information processing. There is also a 32-bit system though only displayed. But the actual memory is as much as it can be. So you don't have to worry about running out of memory for this.

You asked a neurotic question, you know, hahahahahaha

Learn more about computers, don't just come up with something to say, hahahahaha.

I also tried to split the memory like this brother twice, and it was also because the XP system couldn't use up the 4G memory. However, this practice will make the system unstable, and the split disk will not look comfortable. Like win7, few people generally divide the memory, and the reason for the slow system can be changed to a hard disk with a faster cache (if it is a desktop), or you reinstall a system.

The reason why the system is slow, most of the problems are due to the system.

It's not good to divide a part of the memory.,Your win7 with 4G memory itself is just right.。

2.Adding a piece of memory can be used as a cache for the hard disk, which will definitely be a little faster.

3.This depends on the stability of the software itself, and the one I used was unstable. It doesn't work to use cracked software that appears within three months. Frequent crashes and blue screens are not. It's just that after you delete this software, you have to re-set the browser and PS software (generally needed).

I've also recently upgraded the memory of my laptop. It turned out to be a 2G one, and I bought a 4G plug in it. The total is 6G, but the 32-bit system can only recognize more than 3G, minus the video memory of the integrated display, only 3G.

I used a lot of methods to use the remaining 3G memory, but the effect was not ideal and too troublesome.

So,Decisively install 64-bit win7。 Since then, the world has been quiet.

Regarding FC, I also used this software after looking at a microcomputer, and in general, it had some effect, but it was not noticeable.

1. It must be zoned out of memory that the system can recognize as a cache. A 32-bit system can of course only be carved out of more than 3G of memory.

2. If the system can't recognize the memory, don't hit it.

3. It has a slight impact on stability. Moreover, it will consume a lot of CPU resources.

So, switching to a 64-bit system is king. FC is more chicken.

1.Be.

2.OK. 3.Yes.

It's better to use fancycache than supercache, at least there is an official version and a harmonious version. Considering that the stability is not as good as using ramdisk or eboostr, it is slower to boot.

The safest way is to use the 64-bit version (Blood Lesson).

If you change it, it will definitely be unstable. Even if you change to 4G, it doesn't have the effect of 4G. It's useless, it's just to look good.

2 2G is really a waste, but it doesn't say which physical memory module is set as a virtual cache, only if your physical memory module is not enough, just take a part of the disk space and set it as virtual memory to meet the needs.

If you want to improve performance, I recommend that you set the memory overclocking. Here's how:

There are a lot of memory parameters in the BIOS, and optimizing these parameters can overclock the memory and improve the performance of the system.

Step 1 Start the computer and press the DEL key to enter the main BIOS settings interface.

Step 2 Select the "Advanced Chipset Features" option in the main menu and discover the settings regarding memory. The "SDRAM CAS Latency Time" parameter is for SDRAM memory, the length of the CAS signal delay time has a great impact on memory performance, and it generally has three options: Auto 3 2.

Normally, compatible memory can only operate in CL=3 (3 clock cycles for CAS signals).

If the memory quality is relatively good (especially for products from famous brands such as Kingmax), it can work normally under CL=2 (the delay time of the Cas signal is 2 clock cycles), and the performance will be greatly improved.

Step 3 Next is the "Sdram Cycle Time Tras TRC" setting item. This parameter is used to determine the number of clock cycles for the SDRAM memory line activation time and the line cycle time.

Step 4: The smaller the activation time and the number of cycles, the faster the memory will be read. You can set this item to be smaller, if the memory quality is better, you can set it to 5 7, which is faster.

Memory virtual hard disk tutorial, use ramdisk memory to simulate hard disk, memory disk installation method.

Just set the virtual memory without paging, it will become the default only to use the memory for virtual cache, and in fact, XP uses 2G memory, which is not much waste.

Create a largesystemcache in the registry as a disk cache.

hkey_local_machine->system->controlset002->control->session manager->memory management

Create a largesystemcache here and set it to 1

Everyone knows that hard drives are more important to computers because they can store many important things. Therefore, everyone agrees that the bigger the hard disk cache, the better, because they think that the larger the hard disk cache, the faster the computer will run. Therefore, when many people go to buy hard drives, they don't consider other hard drives, and just tell the salesperson that they want to cache a large one.

But is it the right thing to do? Is it true that the bigger the hard disk cache, the better? Don't be in a hurry, let me tell you in detail.

Hard disk cache, in fact, is to save the data to the hard disk in the memory space allocated by the system for the software, when the data saved to this memory reaches a certain level (this is the size of your hard disk cache, the larger the cache can save more data at a time. This data is then saved to the hard disk, which reduces the number of actual operations on the hard disk. Effectively protect the hard drive from damage caused by repetitive read and write operations.

Although a large-capacity cache can store more data in the cache while the hard disk is in a state of read and write work, so as to improve the access speed of the hard disk, it does not mean that the larger the cache, the more outstanding. There is an algorithm problem in the cached application, even if the cache capacity is large, but there is no efficient algorithm, it will lead to a low hit rate of cached data in the application, and the advantages of large-capacity cache cannot be effectively played. The algorithm is complementary to the cache capacity, the large capacity of the cache needs a more efficient algorithm, otherwise the performance will be greatly discounted, from a technical point of view, the algorithm of the high capacity cache is an important factor that directly affects the performance of the hard disk.

Based on the above explanation, we can know that in the case of other parameter systems, the larger the hard disk cache, the better. Nowadays, the mainstream hard disk is SATA interface, although the size of the hard disk cache has a great impact on the hard disk, but we should not ignore the speed of the hard disk.

If the number of revolutions of the hard disk itself is relatively low, such as the silent speed of the hard disk of a notebook hard disk or a desktop is generally only about 5400 revolutions, too large a cache will occupy memory and slow down the machine, and cannot improve the performance of the hard disk.

After reading the article, I believe you must have a lot of clarity about the cache problem of hard disks. Although a large hard disk cache can improve access speed, we also have to consider the actual situation of our computer, whether it is really suitable for too large cache. It seems that the hard disk cache that everyone often understands is that the bigger the better, but it is actually an obvious misunderstanding.

Friends, remember that the next time you adjust the cache of the hard disk, do not choose too large a cache, we must understand the performance of our computer, and then adjust the cache of the hard disk according to its performance must not be wrong.