When the son gets married, the money borrowed before the marriage is repaid by the parents or the so

I am also in such a situation, the family conditions are not good, there is basically no money when I buy a house, and the money I borrowed for marriage is actually not much, more than 20,000 yuan, because I helped to pay back the money, after all, my parents are getting older day by day, we are still young, there are still opportunities, there is still time, and there is still the ability to make money, maybe not much.

Just because I returned the money, my wife came home and told her father, her father talked about this for a long, long time, about half a year, as long as I went, I had to mention it intentionally or unintentionally, and then it was like there were many similar things, that is, the money could only be spent on the daughter-in-law, and I could only take care of the daughter-in-law and her family, although I was unhappy, but I still tried my best to maintain it until the end, she finally said the divorce, and we divorced.

Think about it yourself, marriage is not a matter of two people, it is a matter of two big families, a small family, you now think that it may be three families, then it is wrong, in fact, it is a big family, all of them are your relatives. A daughter-in-law can't tolerate her parents-in-law, think about what it's like to be a son, if one day a son-in-law can't tolerate your parents, are you willing? Of course it's a joke, but in fact, the mood is the same, everyone's parents are parents, and no one jumps out of a stone.

Feelings are more important than sincerity, but they need tolerance, understanding and trust, and they may be maintained without the same, but I don't think they will be happy.

If the words are serious, I apologize. I sincerely wish you, I hope that these small contradictions can be resolved, for a long time, these are not called things, but don't let these things that are not called things accumulate, more is a problem, is a big contradiction.

I think it should be returned by the son, it is not easy for your parents to raise you, when you grow up, why not share it for your parents, you must understand that although the daughter-in-law will accompany you in the future, but the kindness of your parents will not be reciprocated? This daughter-in-law is also not sensible.

Come and return my son, my parents are old. Parents are deeper than the sea. As for how to pay it back, don't let the daughter-in-law feel blocked, and the parents are comfortable, then it depends on the son.

Then you have to embarrass your son. There are a lot of idiom stories that are very practical. I hope that my son will use wisdom to resolve and impress with affection.

The Father repays the Son's debts, and the Father should repay the Son's debts if he borrows for the Son. Parents always come first.

Legal Analysis: Generally speaking, whoever the borrower is, the repayer is. In other words, the son and daughter-in-law are not responsible for repayment.

However, if the debt is for the common living expenses of the family, then the family members are jointly and severally liable. That is, if they live together, then this debt is a family debt, and all members are obliged to repay it. The premise is to live together.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 667 A loan contract is a contract in which the borrower borrows money from the lender and returns the loan at maturity and pays interest.

Article 668: The loan contract shall be in written form, unless otherwise agreed upon between natural persons. The content of the loan contract generally includes the type of loan, currency, purpose, amount, interest rate, term and repayment method.

Parents lend money to their son to get married, who should pay back.

Hello! I'm glad to answer for you Oh hello, dear, in fact, I have encountered the same problem, generally speaking, the son repays in the end, of course, it also depends on whether there is the ability to repay, if the parents have the ability, they can naturally help, but if the parents are not able to repay, they must be repaid by the son. But kiss you can discuss with your son, if you and his father have the ability to repay, you can repay, but if you don't have the ability, you can let your son repay, because you borrowed this money, after all, it is used for your son's marriage, you didn't use it privately Oh, because they are all a family, just talk about things, you can discuss with your son, because the marriage borrowed who is how much and how much, how can we make a plan for this money, your son must also be able to understand you, Because after all, you don't have the ability to repay, and when you are older, does he still have the ability to repay?

After all, he is still making money, so he can tell the person in arrears to postpone the repayment, and it is okay to pay him back when he has money.

Legal analysis: If the statement was borrowed at that time, then there is an obligation to repay, which is a kind of oral offer. If you don't pay it back, you can sue.

Reason: According to the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, the parties may enter into a contract in written, oral or other forms. The written form is a form in which the contents of the contract, letter, telegram, telex, fax, etc. can be tangibly expressed.

Data messages that can be tangibly represented in electronic data interchange, e-mail, etc., and that can be accessed at any time shall be deemed to be in writing. When a party concludes a contract, it may take the form of an offer, an acceptance or other means. An offer is an expression of intent to enter into a contract with another person, and the expression of intent should meet the following conditions:

1) The content is specifically determined; (2) Indicate that the offeror is bound by the expression of intent after accepting the offeror's acceptance.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 469:The parties may conclude a contract in written, oral or other forms. The written form is a form in which the contents of the contract, letter, telegram, telex, fax, etc. can be tangibly expressed. Data messages that can be tangibly represented in electronic data interchange, e-mail, etc., and that can be accessed at any time shall be deemed to be in writing.

Article 471:When a party concludes a contract, it may take the form of an offer, acceptance or other means.

Article 472:An offer is an expression of intent to conclude a contract with another person, and the expression of intent shall meet the following conditions: (1) the content is specifically determined; (2) Indicate that the offeror is bound by the expression of intent after accepting the offeror's acceptance.

Whoever the borrower is, the repayer is whoever he is. In other words, the son and daughter-in-law are not responsible for repayment. However, the law also stipulates that if the debt is for the expenses of the family's common living expenses, then the family members are responsible for repaying the debt.

That is, if they live together, then this debt is a family debt, and all family members are obliged to bear the debt, but the premise of joint responsibility for repayment is to live together.

1. If the parents' living standards have dropped to below the average level of the region due to the repayment of debts, then the son and daughter-in-law are required to bear the responsibility of support and repay the debts within a certain range.

2. Legally speaking, the loan of the man's parents before marriage does not need to be repaid by the man's wife. This is a premarital debt that belongs to the husband and has nothing to do with the wife. Even when the parties divorce, this part of the debt will be attributed to the man's premarital debts and does not need to be borne by the woman.

1. Is the money borrowed by the parents for their son's marriage a joint debt of the husband and wife?

1. If the debt occurs during the marriage, the debt is a joint debt of the husband and wife and needs to be repaid together without a special written agreement in advance.

2. In the event of divorce, the two parties can divide the debt by agreement, and it may be agreed that one party shall bear the joint debt alone, but this agreement cannot oppose the legitimate rights and interests of a third party, and the creditor can sue both parties to the divorce to claim creditor's rights.

Although the son and daughter-in-law are not responsible for repayment. However, the law also stipulates that if the debt is for the expenses of the family's common living expenses, then the family members are responsible for repaying the debt.

Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 118.

Civil entities enjoy creditor's rights in accordance with law. A creditor's right is the right of the obligee to request a specific obligor to do or not to do a certain act due to contract, tort, management without cause, unjust enrichment and other provisions of the law.

Article 517.

If there are two or more creditors, the subject matter can be divided, and each of them enjoys the creditor's right according to their share, it is a creditor's right according to their share; If there are two or more debtors, the subject matter can be divided, and if each of them bears the debt according to their share, it is a debt according to their shares. Where it is difficult to determine the share of the creditor or the debtor by source, it is deemed to be the same share.