How would you rate the leaders of your current company?

I am in the design industry, and the boss's creativity is very good, but his ability to handle things is a bit poor, and all the public relations are handled by a specialized public relations company.

I just joined the company, but the boss gave me the impression that he was not smiling and very serious, and every time I saw him, I was shocked to sweat.

I hardly have much contact with subordinates like me, everything is directly communicated, and I feel that I am always on top and invincible.

I listen to my subordinates in everything, so I have a sense of belonging in such a company, and your company has such achievements and its own efforts.

This is the kind of smiling tiger who never points out our mistakes when he sees us, even jokes about them, and then asks me to teach the interns a lesson.

My boss is like Qin Shi Huang in ancient times, thinking of one out and one out of the other, and making decisions without any discussion at the meeting.

I have the impression that all bosses have this ability, otherwise it would be impossible to become a boss.

Iron rooster, not a single hair. Because my company is privately owned, the boss really wears every penny on the ribs.

The boss is a typical strong woman, I have never seen her show any other excited expression, and she has a straight face every day.

I can't describe it in words. In short, a set of stabs in the back is the best description.

The evaluation opinions and suggestions for the individual leaders are:

1. Young and promising, but never arrogant, always modest and low-key, not arrogant or impetuous, caring about cadres and uniting colleagues; Firm political stance, pay attention to learning and improvement, and have a high ideological and theoretical level; Work dedication, decisiveness, vigorous and resolute; Pragmatic style, clear thinking, able to combine the decision-making of superiors and party groups with the actual work in charge, and carry out work creatively; Adhere to principles, pay attention to methods, do not avoid contradictions, and are very strict with themselves.

2. The leadership has a strong team spirit, the members have a clear division of labor, good communication and coordination with each other, and on major issues and decision-making issues, they are discussed and decided through the conference, and the collective discussion system of major issues is strictly implemented. It fully embodies the collective strength and the unity of the team.

3. In terms of honesty and self-discipline, leaders can set an example for the party, set strict requirements, and consciously implement the responsibility system for the construction of party style and integrity.

4. Suggestion: Leaders should go to the grassroots level more, understand the actual living conditions of grassroots party members and cadres, help the grassroots to solve practical difficulties, suggest more humanized management, and increase the communication between leaders and grassroots cadres.

5. Suggestion: It is recommended that leaders should adhere to the standard of openness and fairness in promoting cadres, publicize the personal situation of the promoted cadres to the majority of employees in advance, widely solicit the opinions of employees, and strengthen performance appraisal and supervision of cadres who have been promoted.

6. Suggestion: It is recommended that the leader should maintain an approachable attitude towards his subordinates, and maintain a relaxed and harmonious atmosphere between the staff and the leader in the work. The prestige of a leader is established by personality charisma, professionalism and management ability.

1. Advantages: clear leadership ideas, responsibilities to people, deployment in place, strong ability to control the overall situation.

5. Advantages: Leaders often eat and live at the grassroots level, and their families have made great sacrifices.

6. Advantages: helpful, good at unity, hard-working, approachable. Disadvantages: The work style is too restrained and not bold enough.

7. Advantages: kind-hearted, honest, single-minded, shrewd and capable, stable personality, proactive. Disadvantages: Usually pay too much attention to details, and it is possible to neglect the grasp of the whole.

8. Advantages: caring for others, proactive, strong ability to work independently, and good communication skills, willing to work under pressure, and have leadership qualities. Disadvantages: Lack of experience in dealing with people.

9. Advantages: perseverance, perseverance, and their own opinions. Disadvantages: Theoretical learning needs to be further deepened.

10. Advantages: There are your own methods for learning, high efficiency in learning new things, and quick to learn new skills. Disadvantages: Less work experience and further training is needed.

The way of evaluating one's own leadership is different from the way of evaluating others, and it is necessary to learn to subtly state the strengths and weaknesses of leadership.

When the leader asks you to evaluate him, first of all, you have to show a sincere and pertinent attitude, don't blindly talk about the leader's good words, don't let the leader think that you are only a sycophant, and you will definitely not be able to do the right thing. Evaluation should talk about the advantages and disadvantages, you can try to talk about the advantages of the leader first, so that the leader is happy, and put forward some shortcomings appropriately, so that the evaluation of the leader will be more willing to accept.

First, the advantages can be evaluated in detail

Small details will make the other party feel that you are very sincere, and meticulousness is very practical in daily life, for example, if you want to praise a person and praise her clothes for looking good, it is recommended that you specifically explain which details of the clothes look good. If you are complimenting a girl for her good makeup today, you can specifically praise her for her very different eyeshadow color today, which makes people look bright before they see it. I believe that everyone can't refuse such sincere praise, and the same is true for talking about the merits of leadership, so to speak

Shrewd and capable, approachable, and able to have their own opinions on some things, just like the plan we talked about before, the rest of us all think that this plan is not feasible, and we all think that there will be no return after investing in it, but you are different, at that time, I saw the vast market in the later stage of this plan, and chose to invest, and finally succeeded in winning a return of more than 100,000 yuan. Being meticulous will show that your evaluation is genuine and sincere.

Second, the shortcomings can be lightly brushed aside

Evaluating the shortcomings of leadership is a difficult problem for most people, and they don't know whether to talk about the shortcomings of leadership. My opinion here is to talk about it, but don't focus on this shortcoming, everyone is unwilling to listen to others say that they are not good, even if they are generous, they will be unhappy. You can talk about the advantages and then the disadvantages, you can talk about it like this:

It's just that you are too focused on perfection in subtlety and discretion, and often ignore the factor that disturbs the silver and respects time. Another example: the leader pays too much attention to the work and rarely organizes collective activities, which is not convenient for the team's collective spirit and physical and mental relaxation, and I hope that the leader can carry out more group activities.

The important thing to evaluate the shortcomings is to promote first and then suppress.

Many people find it difficult to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of leadership, but as long as they have a good grasp of proportion, it is still very simple to evaluate.

In principle, it may mean that the evaluation of leaders should be realistic. However, if we only talk about the advantages and do not talk about the disadvantages, then there is an atmosphere of blowing the horn and carrying the sedan chair with the leader. If you mention shortcomings to the leader, you will offend the leader of the nuclear Kai.

Therefore, you can mention nine advantages and one disadvantage to the leader, and this shortcoming cannot be directly raised in the form of shortcomings, but can only be indirectly raised in the form of encouragement. For example, you can match the leader with a sentence: In the future, if you care more about our subordinate employees, it will be better to give us a little more benefits.

Evaluate leaders based on their own and colleagues' real feelings, and seek truth from facts and be impartial.

First, the overall political quality of the leadership group is high, and the members of the team take the lead in studying the theories of Marxism-Leninism and ideology, especially in the party's mass line education and practice activities, they set an example, insist on taking the lead and setting an example, and establish a good image among the majority of cadres and workers.

Second, the leadership team has a strong team spirit, a clear division of labor among team members, mutual communication and coordination in place, and a strong sense of unity. In accordance with the principle of "collective leadership, democratic centralism, individual deliberation, and decision at meetings," we have constantly perfected and perfected the rules and procedures for the division of labor, deliberations, and decision-making within the team, thus laying a solid foundation for the smooth progress of all work. On major issues and decision-making issues, the system of collective discussion is strictly implemented, which fully reflects the collective strength, and the team is united and unified without noise.

3. The development ideas of the leadership team are clear, the strategic planning is clear, and the plan to promote the take-off and rise of Guangping Development Zone is detailed and specific, and the measures are effective. Professionalism, strong sense of responsibility, week.

6. Overtime work on rest days has become the norm, regardless of personal gains and losses, and dedication to contribute to the economic development of Quang Binh.

Fourth, the leadership team has a strong sense of reform and innovation, and boldly explores reform and innovation ideas in the face of complex and changeable environmental situations. Fully support the development and growth of enterprises in the development zone, and actively coordinate and solve various problems such as debt disputes and labor conflicts for enterprises, so as to be a good nanny, good housekeeper and good backing for enterprises in the development zone.

Fifth, in terms of honesty and self-discipline, the leading group can set an example, set strict demands on itself, consciously implement the responsibility system for the construction of party style and integrity, effectively prevent the occurrence of corrupt behavior, and have a good reputation.

In the face of this situation of evaluating colleagues, it is recommended to grasp these three principles: seek truth from facts; Just talk about things, don't add oil and vinegar. Don't let leadership problems ruin your relationships in the workplace.

In fact, no matter how you answer, the leader already has a preliminary idea in his heart. Your answer just provides some reference value. However, your hasty answer will not only easily offend people, but also affect the leader's evaluation of you.

The leader either wants to promote this colleague or wants to grab this colleague's pigtails, so he wants to get an answer from you that he can refer to to see if he can meet expectations.

This is going to test your sensitivity in the workplace, through the daily news of the company, the leader's usual attitude towards that colleague, and the atmosphere when you evaluate, after quickly sorting out, you will have the bottom of your heart.

1. The leadership has clear ideas, responsibilities to people, deployment in place, and strong ability to control the overall situation.

2. The leadership has high personal quality, rational thinking and work ability, and sets an example for everyone to learn.

3. The leader is easy-going, unites colleagues, cares about comrades, can fully mobilize everyone's enthusiasm, and has a strong affinity.

4. Under the leadership of the leaders, everyone performed their duties, cooperated with each other, gave full play to the joint force, and reflected strong combat effectiveness.

5. Leaders often eat and live at the grassroots level, forgetting selfishness, and their families have made great sacrifices.

The shortcomings of leadership are everywhere, and the platform for leadership work is too narrow, and it is difficult to reflect their talents.

The wish of subordinates: I hope to give the leader a greater space for development, so that the leader can give full play to the greater potential.

How to evaluate the 20190713 of the old leaders

To evaluate a leader, we must not use his words as the criterion, but must use the results of his leadership as the criterion. No matter how beautiful his words may be, he is not a good leader if the results are bad. Politicians all claim to serve the people and love the people like children, but the results vary widely.

Wise and martial, good-hearted, caring for subordinates, studying hard and improving every day.

Leaders, especially the leaders of enterprises, must give face to employees! Otherwise, you are not a leader.

It can be accessed from:

1.Leadership, 2Professionalism, 3Integrity, 4Flexibility, 5, Fairness, 6There are some aspects to evaluate, such as responsibility.

Reference: Anonymous Evaluation of Leaders - Direct Evaluation Network focuses on anonymous scoring and evaluation services for leaders.