Whether monopolies hinder the development of industry

The formation of monopoly organizations plays a certain positive role in regulating production and promoting the development of productive forces.

However, it should be pointed out that monopoly cannot eliminate competition, still less can it solve the fundamental contradiction of capitalism, that is, the contradiction between the socialization of production and the private ownership of the means of production, and the emergence of monopoly will also hinder the improvement of technology and the development of productive forces to a certain extent.

Hindrance and facilitation, both sides, cannot be beaten to death with a stick.

Hello, the monopoly organization will definitely hinder the development of industry, because monopoly is an act that hinders social progress and is not conducive to human development, so it will eventually hinder the development of industry.

Monopoly will definitely affect the development of industry to a certain extent, because some technologies and resources are controlled by monopoly organizations, and others will not have the incentive to innovate anymore. Moreover, if the monopoly organization is high, it may not want to forge ahead, and the monopoly technology will not be leaked, and it will not innovate again. For a long time, industry will stagnate and affect social development.

On the one hand, monopolies tend to be larger, according to the "economies of scale" effect, that is, when the size of the organization expands within a certain range, the total average cost of production falls. It's just internal economies of scale, but also the benefits of external economies of scale. But on the other hand, monopolies undermine free competition in the market and reduce the efficiency of the market.

In fact, there is a special description of the two-sided nature of this monopoly in academic circles, which is the "Marshall conflict". Because it was Marshall who first came up with the concept of "economies of scale". So which is the greater positive effect of economies of scale or the negative effect of destroying the free competitive market?

This sparked the later debate between the Chicago School and the Harvard School, which led to the theory of industrial organization. The subject can continue to delve into this direction.

In the early stage of the monopoly organization, because the monopoly may be able to promote the development of industry, because it can better manage and use resources, but in the later stage, it will definitely hinder the development of industry.

Legal Analysis: The Impact of Monopoly Organizations: First, the monopoly of monopoly organizations in the market and monopoly will inevitably reduce the living standards of the majority of residents.

Second, the formation of monopoly capital is the result of the devouring of small production by large production, and is full of violence, fraud, and all kinds of vile and ugly methods. Third, the formation of monopolies will inevitably be accompanied by the emergence of a rentier class. Fourth, the formation of monopolies promoted colonial expansion, and there was a frenzy to carve up the world.

Fifth, monopoly capital is the root cause of war.

Legal basis: Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China Article 3 The monopolistic acts provided for in this Law include: (1) the undertaking enters into a monopoly agreement; (2) Undertakings abusing their dominant market position; (3) Concentrations of undertakings that have or may have the effect of eliminating or restricting competition.

A monopoly organization refers to an organization established by a number of large enterprises through agreements, holdings, shareholdings, etc., in order to obtain high profits.

Monopoly organizations arise on the basis of the concentration of production in enterprises. Because of the different degrees of development of socialization and concentration of production in the process of economic development, the degree and specific purpose of collusion or alliance between large enterprises are also different, so there are various forms of monopoly organizations. Cartels, syndicates, trusts, and conzein are the four main forms of monopoly organizations.

Legal basis: Article 3 of the Anti-Monopoly Law, the monopolistic behaviors stipulated in this Law include:

1) The undertakings reach a monopoly agreement;

(2) Undertakings abusing their dominant market position;

(3) Concentrations of undertakings that have or may have the effect of eliminating or restricting competition.

Legal Analysis: Impact: 1

The emergence of monopoly organizations is the result of the development of productive forces, and objectively promotes the development of production to a certain extent. 2.Partial adjustment of capitalist relations of production.

3.The capitalist Lu's Lingist state has gradually become the representative of the interests of the monopoly group. 4.

The capitalist countries have stepped up the pace of foreign aggression and expansion.

Legal basis: Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 2 This Law shall apply to the conduct of colluding with relatives in economic activities within the territory of the People's Republic of China; This Law applies to monopolistic conduct outside the territory of the People's Republic of China that has an impact on the elimination or restriction of competition in the domestic market.

Article 3 The monopolistic acts provided for in this Law include:

1) The undertakings reach a monopoly agreement;

(2) Undertakings abusing their dominant market position;

(3) Concentrations of undertakings that have or may have the effect of eliminating or restricting competition.

The main reasons for the formation of monopolies are:

1. Control and possession of key resources or key raw materials.

2. Patent system.

3. Economies of scale.

4. Access system.

5. The development of market competition itself will lead to the sluggishness and concentration of production, and the concentration of production will develop to a certain extent, and it will naturally form a monopoly.

[Extended Materials].Monopoly and competition are inherently a pair of contradictions, due to the lack of competitive pressure and development momentum, coupled with the lack of a strong external restraint and supervision mechanism, the service quality of monopoly industries is often unsatisfactory, often violates the laws of the market, infringes on consumers' right to fair trade and the right to choose. This is a law, and China is the same as foreign countries.

The main form of monopoly organization is the letter type:

1) short-term ** agreements, which are the simplest forms;

2) Cartel, is an organizational form in which enterprises that produce similar goods, in order to obtain high profits, reach agreements on the division of markets, stipulate the output of commodities and commodities. The enterprises participating in the cartel organization maintain their operational independence in production and sales, except for the division of sales markets according to the agreement, the determination of output and the establishment of standards**;

3) Syndicat is an alliance formed by a small number of large-hole leather wheel enterprises in the same production sector in order to obtain high profits, enter into agreements for the joint sale of products and the purchase of raw materials. The enterprises participating in the syndicate have lost their independence in operating the circulation business, and only retain the independence in production and operation;

4) Trust is a conglomerate of enterprises that produce similar products or have close connections in production, in order to control the production of goods, the origin of raw materials, the sales market and the scope of investment, in order to obtain high profits. The enterprises participating in the trust completely lose their operational independence in production and circulation, and each enterprise forms a huge enterprise, which is managed by the board of directors in a unified manner, and the capitalists of each enterprise become shareholders of the trust and receive economic benefits according to their shares;

5) Konzarn, also known as a consortium, is a joint organization of production, circulation, transportation, insurance, and banking enterprises based on a certain largest capitalist group. The companies participating in Contzeen only maintain their independence in form.

According to the agreement, the sales market is divided, and the output and specified standards are determined**;

Legal basis

Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 46.

Anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies shall investigate suspected monopolistic acts in accordance with the law.

Any unit or individual has the right to report suspected monopolistic acts to the anti-monopoly law enforcement agency. Anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies shall maintain the confidentiality of whistleblowers.

If the report is made in writing and relevant facts and evidence are provided, the anti-monopoly law enforcement agency shall conduct the necessary investigation.

Legal analysis: Monopoly organization refers to the organization established by a number of large enterprises through agreements, holdings, shareholdings and other forms in order to obtain high profits, and the current more common forms of monopoly organizations include cartels, syndicates, trusts, conceits, etc., and the purpose of the establishment of monopoly organizations by capitalists is to obtain high monopoly profits, so China is strictly restricted on monopoly organizations.

Legal basis: Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 25 The anti-monopoly law enforcement agency shall, within 30 days from the date of receipt of the documents and materials submitted by the undertakings in accordance with the provisions of Article 23 of this Law, conduct a preliminary review of the declared concentration of undertakings, make a decision on whether to carry out further review, and notify the undertakings in writing. Before the anti-monopoly law enforcement agency makes a decision, the undertakings shall not carry out the concentration. If the anti-monopoly law enforcement agency makes a decision not to carry out further review or fails to make a decision within the time limit, the undertakings may implement the concentration.

Article 26 Where an anti-monopoly law enforcement agency decides to carry out further review, it shall complete the review within 90 days from the date of the decision, make a decision on whether to prohibit the concentration of undertakings, and notify the undertakings in writing. When making a decision to prohibit the concentration of undertakings, the reasons shall be explained. During the review period, the undertakings shall not carry out concentration.

In any of the following circumstances, the anti-monopoly law enforcement agency may, upon written notice to the business operator, extend the review period provided for in the preceding paragraph, but the maximum shall not exceed 60 days: (1) the business operator agrees to extend the review period;(2) The documents and materials submitted by the proprietor are inaccurate and need to be further verified;(3) There are major changes in the relevant circumstances after the business operator declares. If the anti-monopoly law enforcement agency fails to make a decision within the time limit, the undertakings may implement the concentration.