HiSilicon Kirin 910T processor, is it really inferior to 100 yuan octa core?

910T can be compared with the first generation of octa-core 6592 (half a catty and eight taels), and 6752 is to find abuse. As for the better 8-core and the like, there is no need to mention it.

Huawei P7 is equipped with HiSilicon Kirin 910T with A9 architecture, low power consumption, good performance, and quad-core frequency. Compared with MediaTek's 100-yuan octa-core, it has a relative advantage in CPU performance. The GPU uses MALIT450, which is much more compatible than the GPU used before, playing GTA:

SA and other 2G high-consumption games are enough, MediaTek's P-series GPU is relatively slightly better than Malit450, but MediaTek's P-series GPU has a worse running ability, and sometimes there will be some lag when playing high-consumption games.

Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 910T is relatively better than the 100-yuan MediaTek octa-core. But both have their own strengths and weaknesses. After all, the HiSilicon Kirin 910T was also the flagship of 2 years ago, but it can also be compared with the MediaTek octa-core that it is now, which is also a good processor, but it is also a little lacking compared to Qualcomm Snapdragon.

The 910T is equivalent to the 615 and 430 in the Snapdragon.

Therefore, HiSilicon is not necessarily worse than the 100 yuan octacore. It also confirmed that HiSilicon is still a cut above MediaTek.

Don't pay too much attention to the number of cores, Qualcomm's quad-core and MediaTek's eight-core will know.

The 910T is obsolete, after all, it will be the world of 64-bit processors in the future.

Of course, it's better than 8 cores, and this depends on the performance of the single-core CPU.

It's about the same as a hundred yuan octacore.

Yes, HiSilicon has low power consumption, good signal, stable and smooth. But HiSilicon is HiSilicon, and it is inferior to what Qualcomm did 30 years ago, and HiSilicon will lose, and Qualcomm is invincible in the universe.

The Kirin 620 is a Cortex-A53 architecture, octa-core, and the GPU is Mali-450mp4@700mhz;

The Kirin 910 is a Cortex-A9 architecture, quad-core, and the GPU is Mali-450mp4@500mhz.

The single-threaded CPU performance Kirin 910 is slightly stronger, the multi-threaded CPU performance Kirin 620 is stronger, the GPU performance Kirin 620 is slightly stronger, and the overall performance is still better than Kirin 620.

620, simply look at the parameters, GPUs are the same, they are all 28nm HPC, 620 is A53X8, 910 is A9R4X4, 32-bit may not make any difference, 64-bit system can see it.

The A53 has 30% better co-frequency performance than the A9. Equivalent to a9. However, the 620 is much more efficient than the Android system, so the 620 is better.

The 620 main frequency is too low, and the 910 has strong performance, but the memory bandwidth and multitasking ability are strong 620, after all, 64-bit single channel.

910 is good, the news says that 920 is high-end, 910 mid-range, 620 low-end.

HiSilicon 620 or Qualcomm 615 which is better?