What is Hume s understanding of oneself, Hume s philosophical thought?

Hume points out that we often assume that we are the same as we were five years ago, although we have changed in many ways, and that we were the same person five years ago and we are now. We also think about how far time can change a person's inner self without changing themselves. Hume, however, denied that there was a distinction between the mysterious self and the various personalities that a person possesses.

When we begin to introspect, we will find:"We can never have any consciousness unless we rely on a particular feeling; Man is nothing but a collection or a package of many different senses, which are forever alternating with each other in an unimaginably fast flow rate. "He pioneered modern agnosticism, being skeptical of anything beyond sensation and negatively regarding the objective regularity and causal necessity of the external world.

He believes that perceptual perception is the only object of cognition, and perception is divided into two categories: impression and concept, but he believes that it is impossible for people to go beyond perception to solve the problem of perception. It denies the objectivity of causal connections and holds that causal connections are only an idea formed by the sequence of impressions. In terms of ethics, it advocates utilitarianism, believing that happiness and profit are consistent.

He also used his empiricism, skepticism, and utilitarian ethics to address issues concerning the idea of God and religion.

I don't agree with the typical subjective idealist and agnostic, but there is still merit in the philosophical truth!

Hume was a thorough skeptic, but "thoroughness" here should be put in quotation marks, why? For Hume is not doubting everything, but only doubting the knowledge of necessity derived from causality. Hume believed that human cognition has limitations.

This problem is not clear, and I hope to add it so that it can be solved.

The reason for saying that Hume is thoroughly empiricist is that, on the one hand, Hume adheres to a thoroughly empiricist position, rejects the use of existence outside of experience and whose existence is doubtful as the basis of knowledge, and limits human knowledge to the scope of experience.

1. The core idea of Hume's agnosticism or skepticism.

1. There is no a priori synthetic truth about the external world.

2. Any real knowledge we have about the external world comes down from perceptual experience.

3. Only the knowledge deduced by experiments is correct.

2. Interpretation. On the one hand, Hume insisted on a thoroughly empiricist position, rejecting the use of existence outside of experience whose existence is doubtful as the basis of knowledge, and limiting human knowledge to the scope of experience.

In Hume's view, the reason why our knowledge is reliable and can be formed is that we take the objects that can be presented in our minds as the objects of cognition, and those things that cannot be presented to us in our minds can never be the objects of our cognition.

Even the tools that must be used to construct knowledge—the principle of causality—are acquired as a result of the connections we "feel" in our minds or imaginations. <>

3. The value of Hume's philosophy.

The value of Hume's philosophy lies in the fact that its conclusion, agnosticism, awakens people to question metaphysical absolutism, and awakens people to question the idea of God. Hume also limited human knowledge to the scope of empirical activities by defining "unknowable existence", and opposed the erroneous view that traditional philosophy, especially theoretical philosophy, infinitely expands human intellectual ability.

Hume also called for the use of experimental reasoning to study problems in the field of spiritual science, dissecting the problems of human nature in a normative way. Hume also implied that the explanation of human morality is superior to the reasoning of nature. These ideas of Hume not only had a positive effect on the development of natural science, but also had a great influence on the rise of classical German philosophy.

Hume's point is:

1. "Yes" and "no" (actual relationship, factual judgment) and "should" and "should not" (should relationship, value judgment) are two completely different relationships.

2. Making a judgment of "yes" and "no" about a thing cannot directly draw conclusions about "should" and "shouldn't".

3. The conversion from the former to the latter must be discussed and explained.

For example: crows are black. Can't push out the crow should be black. To determine that a crow is and should be black, it must be demonstrated.

Skepticism is a very important force in Western philosophical thought, because it leads to in-depth thinking about phenomena, existence, thinking, consciousness, language, etc., and skepticism has also deeply influenced later philosophers.

You're so lazy......I casually look for Benxi Philosophy and History, it's not a good habit to be a hand-out party