Curriculum standards compare with the syllabus, what is inherited and what is developed

The similarities and differences between the syllabus and the curriculum standards are as follows:

The curriculum standards focus on the quality of the future citizens, and the syllabus focuses on the content provisions. The curriculum standard is a specific description of the results of the national students after receiving a certain stage of education, and is a specific indicator that the national education quality should achieve at a specific educational stage.

The curriculum standards focus on the balance of student learning, methods, and emotional attitudes and values, while the syllabus emphasizes only knowledge and skill objectives. In the past, the syllabus focused on the regulation of teaching work, which mainly expressed the basic teaching objectives.

Teaching content, teaching requirements and some teaching suggestions make teachers pay more attention to knowledge points, pay attention to the effect of learning, ignore the learning process and methods, ignore the cultivation of emotional attitudes and valuesCompared with the teaching syllabus, the most significant change in curriculum standards is that the curriculum objectives have changed fundamentally.

The curriculum standards highlight the importance of the curriculum and lay a solid foundation for students' lifelong development. In the process of developing curriculum standards for each subject, first of all, according to the nature of basic education and the characteristics of the times, the basic knowledge and basic skills are necessary for students' lifelong development.

The previous syllabus not only made clear and unambiguous provisions on the teaching objectives and teaching content, but also stipulated the specific requirements, depth and difficulty indicators of the knowledge points. Most syllabuses also specify a detailed order of instruction (some even in the form of chapters or lessons) and the number of lessons for each section. These have a direct guiding effect on the teaching of front-line teachers.

1. Teaching evaluation is differentThe syllabus and curriculum standards also differ, with the former focusing on summative assessment and the screening function of evaluation, while the latter focusing on the educational development function of process evaluation and evaluation.

The syllabus requires the mastery of knowledge and skills in terms of teaching objectives, while the curriculum standards emphasize the objectives of the three sedan chairs, which are knowledge and technical skills, process and method, and emotional attitude and values.

2. Different teaching methodsThe syllabus focuses on the results of the teacher's teaching and the student's learning, while the curriculum standards focus on the process and method of learning.

3. The preparation of teaching materials is different

Curriculum standards are specific descriptions of the results of students after receiving a certain stage of education, and are specific indicators that the quality of national education should achieve at a specific stage of education, and it has a statutory nature

The syllabus emphasizes the knowledge and skills objectives, and the standards focus on the learning process, methods, emotions, attitudes and values of the students.

As such, it is the basis for the national management and evaluation of curricula and the basis for the development of teaching materials, teaching, assessment and examination propositions. For this reason, the development of curriculum standard guessing is the core link of basic education curriculum reform.

With the deepening of curriculum reform, the original syllabus is no longer enough to fully reflect the changes in the curriculum. It is necessary to seek a new and complete expression of the concept of curriculum reform.

In the new round of curriculum reform, people are rethinking, what should be stipulated in the national curriculum standards? After repeated deliberations and discussions, many experts, scholars, and front-line teachers agreed that in the face of the rapid development of science and technology in the 21st century and the globalization of the economy, it is <> to cultivate a new generation with good quality and competitiveness in the new era

The national curriculum standards should first set out the basic requirements of the State for all aspects of the quality of future citizens, rather than stipulating too much the kind of teaching process through which this requirement will be met. To this end, the target requirements for the future national quality and the standards that should be achieved in each discipline should become the core content of the curriculum standards of each discipline.

The difference between a syllabus and a curriculum standard is mainly a difference in meaning. The syllabus refers to the syllabus of each subject in the school, including the teaching purpose, teaching requirements, teaching content, and the allocation of hours for lectures and internships, experiments, and assignments. Curriculum standards are teaching guidance documents that stipulate the nature of the curriculum, curriculum objectives, content objectives, and implementation recommendations of a certain subject.

Compared with the syllabus, the curriculum standards are detailed and clear in the basic concepts, curriculum objectives, and curriculum implementation suggestions, especially the basic learning requirements for all students.

The syllabus requires the mastery of knowledge and skills in terms of teaching objectives, while the curriculum standards emphasize three-dimensional objectives, namely knowledge and skills, processes and methods, and emotional attitudes and values.