The following are the advantages of group decision making

Apparently a and d c are the drawbacks of group decision-making

Normally, the greatest advantage of group decision-making is that it is the product of a lack of wisdom, which reduces the one-sided decisions caused by individual ability, knowledge level, and so on. But group decision-making implies compromise between each other, which means that the answer may not be the most perfect. The advantages of group decision-making are mainly manifested in:

1) provide more complete information and knowledge; (2) The three stinkers are better than Zhuge Liang; (3) provide more diverse experiences and perspectives; (4) more feasible alternatives can be developed; (5) increase the acceptance of the solution; (6) Increase legitimacy.

The main disadvantages of group decision-making are: (1) time-consuming; (2) monopoly by a few; (3) Obeyed pressure travel key force; (4) "group think", i.e., suppressing dissenting, minority, or unpopular views in order to establish a consistent appearance; (5) Ambiguous Liability.

The advantages are: concentrating the wisdom of experts in different fields, using more knowledge advantages, improving the comprehensiveness of considering problems when making decisions, improving the scientific nature of decision-making, contributing to the smooth implementation of decision-making, and making people brave to take risks.

1. Compared with individual decision-making, the advantages of group decision-making are mainly manifested in the following: group decision-making is conducive to concentrating the wisdom of experts in different fields to cope with increasingly complex decision-making problems. Through the extensive participation of these experts, the experts can put forward constructive opinions on decision-making issues, which is conducive to discovering the existing problems and improving the pertinence of decision-making before the implementation of the decision-making plan.

2. Group decision-making can make use of more knowledge advantages, with the help of more information, to form more feasible solutions. Because the members of the decision-making group come from different departments, are engaged in different work, are familiar with different knowledge, and grasp different information, it is easy to form complementarity, and then dig out more satisfactory action plans.

3. Group decision-making is also conducive to making full use of the different educational levels, experiences and backgrounds of its members. Different members with different backgrounds and experiences often have great differences in the information collected by the test, the type of problem to be solved and the idea of solving the problem, and their extensive participation is conducive to improving the comprehensiveness of the problem in decision-making and improving the scientific nature of decision-making.

4. Group decision-making provides the acceptability of decision-making and contributes to the smooth implementation of decision-making. Because the members of the decision-making group are broadly representative, the decision-making formed is a convergent view on the issue formed on the basis of synthesizing the opinions of all members, which is conducive to the understanding and acceptance of the relevant departments or personnel, and it is easy to obtain mutual support and cooperation from the relevant departments in the implementation. This will greatly contribute to improving the quality of decision-making implementation.

5. In addition, group decision-making makes people brave to take risks. Studies have shown that many people are more willing to take risks than individuals in group decision-making.

In organizations, group decision-making has a wide range of applications, but does this mean that group decision-making is necessarily superior to individual decision-making? The answer to this question depends on several factors. Now, let's look at the pros and cons of group decision-making.

Advantages of group decision-making.

Both group and individual decision-making have their advantages, but neither can be applied to any setting. Group decision-making has some major advantages over individual decision-making:

3.Improved acceptability of decision-making. Many decisions are made and then died because they were not accepted by the people.

However, if those who will be affected by the decision and those who will carry it out in the future are able to participate in the decision-making process, they are more willing to accept the decision and encourage others to do the same. As a result, decisions are made with more support and the employees who execute them are more satisfied.

4.Increase legitimacy. North America and many capitalist societies value democratic approaches.

The process of group decision-making is consistent with democratic ideals and, as such, is considered more legally desirable than individual decision-making. If an individual decision-maker does not consult others before making a decision, the decision-maker's power may be seen as arbitrary.

Disadvantages of group decision-making.

Of course, group decision-making is not without its drawbacks. Its main disadvantages are:

1.Waste of time. Organizing a group takes time.

After the emergence of a group, the interaction between group members is often inefficient, so that the time spent on group decision-making is more than that of individual decision-making, thus limiting the ability of managers to react quickly when necessary.

2.Herd pressure. There is social pressure in the group. The desire of group members to be accepted and valued by the group can lead to the suppression of dissenting opinions, which can lead to the pursuit of unity of opinion in decision-making.

3.Controlled by a few. Group discussions can be controlled by one or two people, and if this control is caused by low-level members, the efficiency of the group can be adversely affected.

4.Responsibilities are unclear. Group members share responsibility for the outcome of the decision, but who is responsible for the final outcome? When it comes to individual decisions, the person responsible is clear. For group decision-making, the responsibility of any one member will be reduced.

So, which is better or worse for group decision-making and individual decision-making? It depends on how you measure the effectiveness of your decisions. In terms of accuracy, group decision-making is more accurate.

Evidence suggests that group decision-making is of better quality than individual decision-making. But in terms of speed, individual decision-making has a greater advantage. If you think creativity is the most important, group decisions are more effective than individual decisions.

If your criterion is the acceptability of the final solution, then group decision-making is better. When considering the effect of decision-making, it is impossible not to consider the efficiency of decision-making. In terms of efficiency, group decisions are always inferior to individual decisions.

On the same issue, group decision-making always takes more time than individual decision-making, with few exceptions. Therefore, when deciding whether to adopt the form of group decision-making, we should weigh whether the advantages of group decision-making in decision-making effect can outweigh its loss in efficiency.

Group decision-making: Advantages: First, group decision-making can better ensure the rationality and correctness of decision-making results.

Second, the decision-making of the group has a good execution. Third, group decision-making tends to be more creative. Cons:

First, it takes a long time to make decisions. If there are many people participating in group decision-making, their opinions will naturally be diverse, and it will take more time to reach a unified understanding in group decision-making, so it will prolong the decision-making time, and at a particularly urgent juncture, it may also delay the opportunity. Second, there is no clear person in charge of decision-making, which is easy to create a situation where no one is responsible for the consequences of decision-making.

Decision-making is produced and developed at a certain historical stage, reflecting the characteristics of the times. With the change of the environment, decision-making has increasingly presented some new characteristics, the most typical of which is that group decision-making has been valued and developed rapidly, and group decision-making is the overall process of decision-making, analysis and decision-making by multiple people to give full play to the collective wisdom. Among them, the people involved in decision-making make up the decision-making group.

For the type of decision-making, groups produce more complete information and knowledge. By pooling the wisdom of several people, the group brings more input to decision-making. In addition to input, groups can bring diversity to decision-making.

They have led to a diversity of perspectives, which has led to more input and options to consider. Much evidence shows that even the best individuals do no better than the group. As a result, the team produces high-quality decisions.

Finally, cohorts can lead to increased acceptance of the programme. Many decisions were ultimately not adopted because the options were not accepted. Group members who participate in making a decision are more enthusiastic about supporting the decision and encouraging others to accept it.

a) Provide more complete information. The different backgrounds, experiences, and knowledge of group members are incomparable to those of a single individual. A group will bring more and more complete information to decision-making.

(c) Increase motivation and programme acceptance. Many decisions fail after making a choice, mainly because people do not accept the solution. Acceptance of the programme can be improved if there are people who are affected by the decision, or who implement the decision, are involved in the decision-making process; At the same time, participation in decision-making also increases people's motivation.

(d) Enhancing legitimacy.

Individual decision-making, i.e., decisions are made by individuals. In a group or team, there is often a need for a leader, and the decisions made by this leader are individual decisions. Individual decision-making is a kind of single decision-making, with one decision-making subject and one decision-making direction.

This determines that there is a direct link between decision-making and the quality of the leader.

There are advantages to individual decision-making:

1. Personal decision-making is equivalent to the concentration of power, so it has the intuitiveness of understanding things and the rapidity and effectiveness of decision-making;

2. Individual decision-making is the leader's decision-making instead of the group's decision-making, so this reflects the cohesion and determination of the team;

3. Personal decision-making is to make decisions based on personal thinking and experience, so it also has the emergency change and flexibility to deal with unexpected situations.

Group decision-making, i.e., decisions are made by groups. In groups and teams, group decision-making is increasingly recognized in today's society because people are different and make decisions that take into account everyone's ideas.

Advantages of group decision-making.

1. Group decision-making is a group of people to make decisions, and a large amount of information is collected, so it is reasonable and accurate;

2. Group decision-making is discussed and decided by the group, which shows that everyone in the group is familiar with the content of the decision and recognizes the decision, which is conducive to the implementation of the decision;

3. Group decision-making because the people in the group are different, which will also reflect the innovation of decision-making;

4. Group decision-making is a decision that is acceptable to everyone, so this also determines the inclusiveness in decision-making.

How to make group decisions?

First of all, as a group or organization, we need a common goal and direction, so as to motivate members to work towards a goal, and the common direction and goal will stimulate people's motivation and potential.

Secondly, a good group needs a good concept and culture, and it requires members to abandon themselves, serve the collective or group, and promote the development of the collective.

Moreover, if the group's decision-making is to conform to the interests of each member, it is necessary to have members compromise and reasonably integrate the interests of all parties.

Finally, group decision-making is the decision of the majority, and what is needed is the approval and effort of each member.

The advantages of group decision-making do not include ().

a.Increased speed and decision-making efficiency.

b.Concentrate on the wisdom of experts in different fields.

d.Improve the comprehensiveness and pertinence of decision-making.

Correct answer: Improves the speed of debate and the efficiency of cluster decision-making.

Answer]: B Test Point: Advantages of Group Decision-making, P115