Is it worth marrying a man who is not willing to spend money on you and is also stingy with himself

Maybe it's because he grew up in a bad family.

So I developed the habit of being more economical.

You say that he is reluctant to spend money on you, and he also saves for himself, which just shows that his saving has become a habit.

And it also shows that you may be his first love, and he doesn't know what girls care about.

I won't coax girls!

As for whether you will be stingy with your family in the future, I don't think so.

Don't you also say that he has changed a little, since he has changed, it means that he cares about your feelings and cares about you!

The main thing is that he is smaller than you.

I also have a mantra in this situation: little men are meant to be taught.

As long as you have the patience to change him, I believe everything will be fine!

Then let me ask you, is it worth marrying a man who is willing to spend money on you and is equally generous to himself? In fact, it's not about spending money at all, the most important thing is the mind, as long as the mind is spent on you, it doesn't matter too much whether you have money or not, because some people think that others don't need ...... what they don't need

This is the issue of personal values, which is a very controversial issue and a worldwide problem.

And you just want to find a man who is good enough for you to marry......

Don't always think about money, because a good man must have a good way to support himself and his family.

If you value money, find a big one.

Why do you have to spend money on you, if you have this traditional concept, then do you have to abide by the three obedience and four virtues? Like women in the old society, if you want to follow tradition, then you have to be traditional.

Your sister is suitable to be the second wife, according to her theory, whoever spends more money will be more sincere.

You are a person who goes abroad, you should have a wide range of knowledge, how can you still look at the problem with money, don't you know that foreign couples have AA system?

Everything can only be **, and after you implement it, all the mysteries will be revealed.

The problem you're talking about now is, for the most part, an experimental one, with good expectations and not necessarily results.

There aren't so many reasons to love someone, your sister's fart stinks.

To compare it in another way, he is very stingy, but he spends more money for you than himself, and more than others, so it's fine. The proof is already good for you.

A man who is reluctant to spend money on you, but at the same time is also very stingy with himself, he is such a character that you can't change. If you can't accept it, then you can't be together.

is reluctant to spend money on you, and is also stingy with yourself, which means that such a man is more proficient, and some men are very generous to themselves, and that kind is selfish.

I don't think it's worth it, because this kind of boy picks at you, and if you say it, it may also be at your family, and you won't help when you encounter difficulties.

I spend money for you, and I am also stingy with my own men, I think such a man cannot be married, if you marry such a man, you can only follow him and suffer.

This man is very stingy with your money, maybe because of his living environment, because he was born in the countryside, maybe he is not as casual about spending money as a city child, you have to look at the details of his other aspects of you, and it can't be said that he likes you by this aspect?

This kind of person comes first with money and doesn't know how to enjoy life, so I don't think it's good to marry.

A man who is not willing to spend money on you is not willing to spend money on himself, and a man is also worth marrying, and if the conditions are better, he is worth marrying. If he is willing, he will be willing, and if he is not willing, he will live.

A man who refuses to give for anyone is selfish. If you live with this kind of person, you will suffer a lot of anger for no reason in the future.

Hello, no matter what era it is, a man who is not willing to spend money on each other is not worth marrying, you have no money to earn, but you can't help but give each other flowers.

It depends on how stingy the man is.

If it's just about what can be bought or not, in addition to denying all of them, aren't those necessities also very stingy?

If so, then you really have to think about it before you plan for the next step.

It may seem like a coincidence that a man who is not willing to spend money on you is worth marrying, but if we look at the problem from a larger perspective, it seems to be an inevitable fact. And these are not entirely important, the more important thing is that everyone has to face these problems. When facing this kind of problem, you must think clearly, is a man who is reluctant to spend money on you worth marrying, and what kind of existence it is.

I hope that everyone will have a discussion in the spirit of knowing everything, saying everything, saying that those who say are not guilty, and those who hear are full of caution.

After the above discussion, Zhu Xi once said that the ancient gentlemen were like holding beautiful jade and hid it deeply, and the later people used stone as jade and showed off. This sentence seems simple, but the gloom in it can't help but make people think deeply. How do you need to do it if a man who is reluctant to spend money on you is worth marrying, and how will a man who is not willing to spend money on you be worth marrying?

For me personally, whether a man who is reluctant to spend money on you is worth marrying is not only a major event, but also a life-changing one. To sum up, Bacon casually said that the rich words are like glittering beads. True wisdom is short in words.

This seems to answer my doubts. After the above discussion, what is the crux of the matter? Everyone has to face these problems.

In the face of this kind of problem, we must unify our thinking, unify our steps, and work hard to fundamentally solve the problem of whether a man who is reluctant to spend money on you is worth marrying. The folk proverb summed up his life experience into such a sentence, a good ridge, there is a thin cow. This seems to answer my doubts.

What is the crux of the matter? Think clearly, is a man who is reluctant to spend money on you worth marrying, and what kind of existence it is. Think clearly, is a man who is reluctant to spend money on you worth marrying, and what kind of existence it is.

Now, it is very, very important to solve the problem of whether a man who is reluctant to spend money on you is worth marrying. So, is a man who is reluctant to spend money on you worth marrying, what will happen if it happens, and what will happen if it doesn't. We all know that as long as it makes sense, then it has to be carefully considered.

The so-called man who is reluctant to spend money on you is worth marrying, the key is how to write a man who is not willing to spend money on you is worth marrying. Anonymous once mentioned that knife wounds are easy to treat, but mouth wounds are difficult to treat. This sentence is like a bosom mate in my life journey, constantly motivating me to move forward.

Think of it this way: France has said a philosophical remark that if you say too much, even the witty words will change. This sentence is like a bosom mate in my life journey, constantly motivating me to move forward.

We might as well think of it this way: it seems to be a coincidence that a man who is not willing to spend money on you is worth marrying, but if we look at the problem from a larger perspective, it seems to be an inevitable fact.

I think such a man, although he is not willing to spend money on you, and he is also stingy with himself, such a man can live and can be married.

I don't think such a man is worth marrying, he is not willing to spend money on you, he is also very stingy, he doesn't know how to live, what's the point of living with such a person?

Is it worth marrying a man who is not willing to spend money on you and is also stingy with himselfA man who is not willing to spend money on you and is also stingy with himself can also marry.

You are not married yet, even if you ask him to spend money on you, you must have a quota, you can't have all his money at your disposal, you are not right.

A man who is reluctant to give you love flowers is not worthy of your marriage, after all, he does not really love you, if he really loves you, just say that no matter how stingy he is, he will give you money to spend.

I think such a man is not worthy of your marriage, it's not that people are not worthy of you to marry, but you are not worthy of being married, people in the countryside may be stingy with themselves, they may be stingy with others, but they will definitely not be stingy with their families.

It may be that the conditions in which this man has lived since he was a child are not very good, and people with such conditions will not spend money lavishly. So I don't think it's a big deal.

It depends on what kind of personality you have? In fact, people who are also stingy with themselves, safety is quite safe, depending on what you think?

Note that you are willing to spend money, and a man who is also stingy with himself is not worth marrying, and he will be angry if he marries in this situation.

A man who is not willing to spend money on you and is also stingy with himself is not worth marrying.

A man who is willing to spend money on you and is also stingy with himself is not worth marrying, because he always puts money first, such a person is not worth it, and there will be many contradictions in the future.

I don't think it's necessary for this kind of person to marry him, because after living together like this, you will be angry all day long. So it's better not to get married.

I think he may be used to frugality, and if you can't stand this solution, you can refuse. It's all up to you, and if you can accept it, you can choose him.

Whether or not you are willing to spend money before marriage does not represent what it will be like after marriage. Observe the marriages of the people around you, some of them are reluctant to spend before marriage, and buy what they want after marriage. This should be a kind of thinking that not getting married is not yet within one's own jurisdiction.

Another is to give up flowers before marriage, in order to make the girl happy, marry home early. After getting married, you may not care about this, which is also the reason for many family conflicts. There are also several other phenomena:

They are reluctant to spend before and after marriage, or they are willing to spend before and after marriage. But a good marriage is actually two people who have the same three views. Falling in love for the purpose of marriage should not be measured by reluctance to spend money.

was reluctant to spend before marriage, maybe he was always thrifty, or maybe he happened to be shy in his pocket. After marriage, it is the life of two people, and it is the right solution to live a small family together, and you may not care much about these.

Therefore, for marriage, no one can make a hasty conclusion just because they are reluctant to spend money before marriage. No matter how willing to spend money, the three views do not agree, and it will not last long. Live your life sincerely, put your family and each other in your eyes, accept his good and his shortcomings.

A good marriage depends on two people supporting each other and loving each other. Marriage without material is not good, marriage without spiritual life is not good, with money, if you do not improve your material life appropriately, there will be no good quality of marriage, life is very short, don't hold the gold bricks to gnaw grassroots, spend money in moderation, do what you can, spending money is also the driving force of hard money, will spend money will be bitter money, there is a certain reason.

For love, for marriage, for family, it is not just for you to spend money to get, many women only think about whether a man is willing to spend money for himself, which is a very selfish idea. There are many things to consider before and after marriage, not as long as you can spend all the money for you, the so-called people have no long-term worries, and it is very wrong to only think about the present. People often say that if you can't eat and drink poorly, you can't calculate that you will be poor, and good steel should be used on the blade.

Money must be used and used in the right place, otherwise men dare to spend money on you, and they can only coax you to be happy for a while, but they can't bring you happiness.

I won't get married, because a person who is reluctant to spend money on himself just doesn't love himself, as long as something happens, he will definitely leave, so for his own good, he will distinguish clearly in advance.

I will never get married, because it can be seen from a man's reluctance to spend money for you that a man loves you or not, and usually doesn't care about you, so I think if he is not willing to spend money for me, I think he doesn't love me.

I'm not going to get married. Because if he is reluctant to spend money for you at all, then why should you marry him, do you spend money for him, in the relationship, both parties need to pay.

No, you can have no money for a while, and you will have a problem if you are reluctant to spend money all the time.

I'm not going to get married. I think this kind of man is unreliable, if the other party is not willing to spend money on you, it means that the other party does not love you, so there is no need to marry him.

I am Xiao Titu, the more he is willing to spend money for me, the more right he is, he is reluctant to spend money for me, I will not marry.

If your man doesn't give a penny, will you use it?

It's not worth it in the first place! It's not that he cares how much money he spends for you, or that he doesn't give you money when you usually buy something. When the two of you are together, it's always you who pays.

Tell me about my ex-boyfriend! My ex-boyfriend, their family is still living in good conditions, and they have two houses in the city. He's not stingy, he shouted to buy clothes for himself, buy some games, and the ** in it is very willing to be equipped!

But for example, when the two of us go out shopping together, I want to drink a cup of milk tea, I have to pay for it myself, when I go shopping, he never says what clothes he wants to buy me, etc., the two of us eat together, and I have always paid the bill! I remember one time I was particularly angry when the two of us went to eat KFC, he said to eat and then I said okay and when I went to check out after I finished buying, I said I don't have change, you can open it first, and then he put it there and said I won't eat it. It was really embarrassing.

Then I got really angry and went out. Then we broke up! Drained celery.

If a man has 1 million and gives you 10,000, and another man has 10,000 and gives you 10,000, then which man will you choose? I believe everyone's answer is the second man. In fact, it depends on why this man is reluctant to spend money, whether the conditions do not allow it, or whether he has money and just doesn't want to spend it on you, or whether this man is stingy.

In fact, now girls are more financially independent, she doesn't really care how much money you spend for her, just to see if you have the heart, and you are reluctant to spend money for her. If a guy is willing to spend money for a girl, and if you can tell her your bank card password, then the girl will feel very secure.

If you are the one who pays for everything you usually do, and he never says to buy you things or give gifts, then break up! But if you really like her, and there is a certain reason why she doesn't spend money on you, then you can consider it, but such a man is really not worth dating!

Thank you all and love you Muma.