Debate Competition: The environment is nature oriented, and the environment is people oriented.

Updated on educate 2024-02-26
5 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    There are many negative impacts on the environment, the continuous development of human beings, energy, land are the inevitable need of things, and human beings are advanced animals, especially now thousands of animals, the extinction of plants are related to human activities, China is a typical Xinjiang tiger, a person will dig the Tarim River embankment, watering their own crops, but the Tarim River is diverted, the green space downstream of the river disappears, and the habitat of Xinjiang tigers disappears! A small act of humanity has led to a genocide on the planet.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Summary. 1.Protecting the environment is important: nature is the support of our life, and protecting the environment is to protect ourselves2The importance of developing science: Inspired by history, we have to trace the trend of the world and develop science to make ourselves strong and free from the trampling of other countries.

    1.Protecting the environment is an important macro chain town: nature is the support of our life, and protecting the environment is to protect ourselvesThe importance of developing science: Inspired by history, we have to follow the trend of the world, develop science, and make ourselves strong and avoid the trampling of other countries.

    Environmental science is an indispensable science in the future and even in the world, which can make people realize how to protect and care for the green environment, and how to suppress the evil habit of destroying the environmentYou can do both.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    If there is no environment, then how can there be people? Nature has contributed so much to humanity, and humanity only.

    If you ask for it, do you violate the benchmark that human beings call themselves civilized? Therefore, environmental protection should be environment-oriented. The environment is the foundation of human existence, and without a good environment, there can be no happy life for human beings.

    Economically, in order to survive and get better, human beings will inevitably seek a better environment by themselves, and if they are not environment-oriented, they will inevitably have to spend more money to repair the pollution. Example: The address of the 2012 British Olympic stadium.

    There's not much time, so let's play so much first, and then add it when we have time.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Personally, I think it is necessary to put people first, because human development and environmental development cannot coexist in harmony, but if there is no human development, what is the use of a good environment? Human development must take precedence over the environment, that's the premise!

    And human development will inevitably be accompanied by population growth, which is also certain, when the population expands to a certain extent, even if the environment returns to primitive times, it is useless!

    Human development to the present, there is a problem that must be paid attention to, that is, human beings have the ability to destroy the earth, in this environment, to protect the environment itself is a false proposition, the only way out for human beings is to develop the space field at full speed, when human beings can survive in space, or find a second habitable planet, there is no such problem of choosing one or the other!

    As far as the earth itself is concerned, it is not an eternal thing, if there is a planet-level problem such as a star colliding with it, and human beings have not developed to the level that can solve the problem, talking about environmental protection is a mouse's eye!

    In conclusion, it can only be said that under the premise of people-oriented, try to protect the environment as much as possible, but taking the environment as the foundation is doomed to self-defeat!

    Here can be added a psychological analysis, people who are based on environmental protection are in a place with a favorable and stable surrounding environment, just like China and the United States! And people-oriented people are basically in a precarious place, like Iraq, Syria... This kind of thinking is the same as a small family and as large as the whole universe!

    When a family husband and wife do not get along, how can we talk about caring for furniture! When there is war all around you, do you still care about greenery? When a country cannot stop the invasion of foreign enemies, can it fight with trees?

    When a creature on a planet does not have the ability to protect itself, then the creature on that planet is not qualified (refer to Avatar)! The earth gave birth to human beings and chose human beings, that is, when there is a problem on the earth, human beings have to stand up and protect it, you dress it in beautiful clothes, but when a bullet comes you can't do anything, is this what you want?

    Born in sorrow, died in peace! Without the ability to protect the earth, but talking about protecting the earth's environment, is it a frog at the bottom of the well? Or is Yoro arrogant?

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    First of all, we want to confirm that the fundamental purpose of our environmental protection is to make our human survival and life better The behavior of protecting the environment is mainly reflected in the protection of the earth, but the earth has been formed for hundreds of millions of years, and the species are constantly changing, and the earth and the environment are still there, and the species are constantly changing In the final analysis, everything we do now is actually protecting ourselves. Does the earth need us to protect it? We humans need protection.

    One-sided pursuit of development, ignoring our living environment, will only be exchanged for self-destruction, and one-sided emphasis on protecting the environment, ignoring our own survival and development, is an unrealistic utopia, slash-and-burn primitive society is the period of least environmental damage But can we go back? Will we go back?

    Based on people-oriented, seeking a balance between human beings and nature, always keeping in mind that one hand to grasp development, one hand to grasp environmental protection, go hand in hand, balanced development, is the right way to the future (after work taxi pure hand, thank you, welcome to exchange).

Related questions
3 answers2024-02-26

Never giving up is a belief.

When the flowers are gone, there will be a time for them to bloom again, and when the sun will set and rise again, but when people's faith has collapsed, there will be no time to rebuild. Once you give it up, there's never a second time to have it. >>>More

8 answers2024-02-26

Debate: Internet language poisons China's language and culture. >>>More

9 answers2024-02-26

First of all, it is necessary to understand the principle of genetic alteration, mutations, radioactive elements, which must not occur in food. >>>More

12 answers2024-02-26

The disadvantage of surfing the Internet is that it makes people learn badly.

11 answers2024-02-26

Long-term use of computers will greatly enhance some abilities of the brain (become smarter), such as visual acuity, finger dexterity, logical thinking ability, and the knowledge and amount of knowledge acquired by computer networks are also quite amazing. >>>More