What is the indicator system of urban development capacity?

Answer]: a, b, c, e

This question examines the evaluation index system of smart cities. The evaluation index system of smart cities can be divided into two types of indicators: capability and effectiveness. The capability index refers to the basic capability evaluation index for the construction and operation of smart cities, that is, the basic ability evaluator price index of the first city to use various front-branch resources to build and operate smart cities.

The first-level indicators of capability in smart city evaluation usually include five aspects: information resources, network security, innovation ability, mechanism guarantee and infrastructure. The sharing of information resources belongs to the secondary indicators of information resources.

Answer]: a, b, e

This question examines the evaluation index system of smart cities. The evaluation index system of Zhengeye smart city can be divided into two types of indicators: ability and effectiveness. The effectiveness index refers to the evaluation index of the construction and operation effect of the smart city, that is, the effectiveness evaluation index of the construction and operation of the smart city in various application fields.

The first-level indicators of effectiveness in the evaluation of smart cities usually include four aspects: public services, social management, ecological livability, and industrial system. The speed of handling and the accuracy of management belong to the secondary indicators of social management.

Evaluate the comprehensive capacity of a city's BAI

body measures zhi

It mainly includes eight aspects, involving economic strength, population regulation, life and consumption, export-oriented economy, transportation, listed companies, science and education, medical care, etc.

These indicators are key indicators that can effectively reflect the strength of the city, and at the same time, they are quantifiable public data.

On the basis of the 2016 edition, the 2016 edition of the "China Urban Comprehensive Development Indicators 2017" adds two new cities, Shannan and Hami, covering all cities at and above the prefecture level in 297 across the country, and follows the 2016 version of the triple bottom line thinking in the evaluation method, continues the "3 3 3" structure, and evaluates and analyzes the sustainable development of cities from the three dimensions of environment, society and economy. With a concise and clear structure, the indicators provide a comprehensive quantitative and visual analysis of complex urban conditions. The ranking has also been announced from the top 20 in the 2016 edition to the top 150 cities.

Zhou Muzhi said that the 2017 edition of the 2106 version of 133 indicator data has been greatly supplemented, and further strengthened the use of satellite remote sensing data and Internet big data, and finally used 175 indicator data to support the "3 3 3" structure, establishing a more perspective and more accurate indicator system. The indicator data used in each major item are 56 environmental items, 55 social items, and 64 economic items.

Taking the environmental major project as an example, the new satellite remote sensing data has a more comprehensive and accurate grasp of ecological resources. The 2017 edition also changed the tendency of the 2016 edition to focus on the per capita evaluation of ecological resources, and paid more attention to the evaluation of the total amount. At the same time, in view of the easing of air pollution, the weight of air pollution indicators has been adjusted in the 2017 version.

As a result, comparing the 2016 and 2017 editions of the environmental category, Beijing has risen from 20th to 17th. ”

According to reports, at present, there are many indicators to evaluate the development status of a city, and the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences has constructed three index systems of comprehensive economic competitiveness, livable competitiveness and sustainable competitiveness to comprehensively evaluate the development status of a city.

According to the report, in the three major index systems, comprehensive economic competitiveness refers to the competitiveness of the current reality, from the perspective of output, the evaluation of the city's economic scale, economic growth and comprehensive economic efficiency, per capita GDP, strictly speaking per capita green GDP, it comprehensively reflects the economic benefits per unit space, as well as the efficiency of the use of land, an important resource, which also reflects the efficiency of the city to create and gather wealth.

Livable competitiveness is mainly examined from the perspective of investment, and livable competitiveness determines the attractiveness of a city to talents, especially high-end talents, thereby affecting the competitiveness of the city's industrial system. According to the framework of factors affecting human development, livable competitiveness is composed of seven aspects: educational environment, medical environment, safety environment, ecological environment, living environment, infrastructure, and economic environment.

Sustainable competitiveness refers to the future and potential competitiveness, which includes six aspects: economy, society, ecology, culture, urban-rural integration and opening up. The balance of natural environment, infrastructure, services and private services ensures convenient and comfortable enjoyment for most residents.

(1) Population and labor force: including three secondary subsystems of population size, quality and structure, management and utilization, with five indicators; (2) Economic development: including 4 secondary subsystems of economic scale, economic structure, economic development and economic efficiency, with 12 indicators;

3) Social development: including 5 secondary subsystems, including residents' income and consumption level, housing and medical services, science and technology, education and culture, social security, and social security, with 16 indicators;

4) Infrastructure: including 3 secondary subsystems of transportation, communications, water supply and drainage, and electricity, with 8 indicators; (5) Environment: including 4 secondary subsystems of population density, investment, waste treatment and greening, with 9 indicators.