Ask for the translation of the two chapters of Analects and Mencius The Beginning of Man and

The beginning of man?。? The Analects have this?

Mencius said: "The health practitioner is not enough to be a big thing, but sending him to death can be a big thing." ”

"Mencius: Lilouxia".

Mencius said, "It is not a great event to worship your parents when they are alive, but it is really a major event in life to bury them after they die." ”

Mencius said)."The etiquette of indecency, the righteousness of injustice, the adult Buddha does. "

(Mencius said:)."Etiquette that is not in line with etiquette, morality and righteousness, and a gentleman with high moral character will not do it. "

Mencius said)."The reason why people are different from beasts is that the common people go to it, and the gentlemen survive. Shun is clear in the common things, observant in the people, by benevolence and righteousness, not benevolence and righteousness. "

(Mencius said:)."There are very few differences between man and beast (only because man understands reason), but the average man still discards these distinctions, and only a noble gentleman can keep them. Shun can understand the truth of various things and understand the mood of various characters because he acts according to benevolence and righteousness, not using benevolence and righteousness as a tool.

Fish as much as I want.

Fish, I want, bear's paw, also I want, can not have both, give up the fish and take the bear's paw. Life, also what I want, righteousness, also what I want, can not have both, sacrifice life and take righteousness. Life is also what I want, and what I want is more than the living, so I don't want to get it.

Death is also evil to me, and evil is worse than the dead, so I have no way to get rid of it. If a man is made to do more than to live, then why should he not use him who can live? If there is no worse thing for a man than for the dead, why not do anything that can be done to cure the sick?

From what is, there is no need to be born, and from what is there is to avoid trouble and there is not to do it, so what you want is more than the living, and what you do is worse than the dead. Not only the sage has a heart, everyone has it, and the sage can not lose his ears.

A spoonful of food, a bean soup, if you get it, you will live, and if you get it, you will die. Huer and with it, the doer of the way is receiving; With it, the beggars disdain.

Wan Zhong accepts it without arguing about propriety and righteousness, so how can Wan Zhong be wrong with me? For the beauty of the palace, the dedication of wives and concubines, and the poor who know me and? The township is not subject to the death of the body, and now it is the beauty of the palace; The township is not subject to death, but now it is the worship of wives and concubines; The country is not subject to death, but now it is for the poor who know that I am doing it:

Yes or no? This is a loss of heart.

Fish is my favorite, bear's paw is my favorite, and if I can't get both, then I'll have to give up fish in favor of bear's paw. Life is what I love, and righteousness is also what I love, and if I can't have both at the same time, then I have no choice but to sacrifice my life for righteousness. Life is what I love, but what I love is something that is better than life, so I don't do anything for the sake of profit.

Death is what I hate, but I also hate things that go beyond death, so I don't shy away from some calamities. If there is no more life than what people love, then all the means that can be obtained to survive can not be used? If there is no more disgust than death, then what bad thing can be avoided from calamity?

There is a way to survive, but there are people who don't, and there is a way to avoid calamity but there are people who don't do it, so it can be seen that they love something more precious than life (that is.