What is History 2000 Words Excerpt 5

When I saw the title of this book, I was attracted to it. Among Chinese historians, there has not been a special discussion on what history itself is, but more on the topic of "why history". This distinction is not the difference between Eastern and Western historiography, but the fundamental difference between Eastern and Western philosophies lies in the essential difference, but it is indeed an important issue.

History is a process of continuous interaction between the historian and historical facts, a never-ending dialogue between the present and the past".It has been said that all history is contemporary. We pay attention to history, we need to pay attention to historians, and we need to pay attention to the society in which historians live.

Book. The second chapter deals with the sociality and individuality of history. In fact, it is essentially a matter of historical inevitability and contingency. History is the process of human behavior, but history is not the process of individual behavior, and we cannot ignore history.

sociality, while exaggerating the historical role of a person. The passivity of man in the course of history is a fact that we have to admit. We can only understand the past in terms of the present, and we can only understand the present through the past.

The dual function of history is to enable people to understand the society of the past and to increase their ability to grasp the present society. History, by its very nature, is social.

Chapter 3 deals with history, science, and morality. Calendar.

The essence of the historian and the collector of historical materials is different, in the article ** since.

Please *****) for the induction of historical facts. And this kind of inductive method of historical research is actually the same as science, and we need to find more than one cause for history to happen, which is the ideological place of the historian of the empty section.

Without this ideological existence, the role of history would cease to exist. Here I think of the question, what is the point of dividing the natural sciences into the social sciences? Knowledge is a kind of recognition of the world by human beings.

Knowledge, the study of history, the study of physics, and the study of chemistry are all components of the world, they are all derivatives of philosophy, and their methods are all the same.

Chapter 4 is entitled "As Progress."

History".In fact, a fundamental question is raised, is history progressive? What is progress, progress is the progress towards a set goal, and does history really have such a direction? I believe that, really.

People who are obsessed with history have more visions and responsibilities for the future than others. Progress in history depends on the continuous transfer of acquired property by human beings, and this process is the source of progress. Progress lies in succession.

to inherit, not to destroy. The progress of history is a kind of faith, and it represents our confidence in the future. Progress is a scientific hypothesis on which history is compiled. In other words, without this assumption, history is meaningless. Science.

is a necessary premise for constructing any edifice of knowledge.

Excerpt from netizens, thank you.

This year marks the 30th anniversary of reform and opening up. I remember at the time of the initial reform, we actually did not expect that China's reform would be so long, so difficult, to 1987, *** asked some researchers in the ministry to formulate a "358" plan, reform 3 years, 5 years, 8 years of planning, short-term, medium-term, long-term planning, I hope that this reform to 95 years will be basically completed, now we know that the overall 30 years have passed, our reform is far from complete, whether it will take 30 years, it is difficult to say. I think maybe by the time we go back in 60 years, maybe the reform has not really been completed, so the reform is a very difficult and long process, and we have only lived under the planning system for 29 years, and under the real planning system, we have been reforming for 30 years.

With such a long process, and at the same time we have achieved so much, what lessons are worth summing up? How did we get here? Where should we go in the future?

What needs to be done effectively by the business community, or academics is a question that is a concern for all of us.

We know that this year has involved a lot of commemoration of the 30th anniversary of reform, the Guanghua New Year Forum is the first large-scale commemorative event, you can look back on that day, we invited 10 Chinese economists, they have made some important and valuable contributions to China's reform and development in various fields, or published some important controversial ideas, but whether it is their policy research, or economic theory, All of them have contributed to China's reform and development! As far as my personal understanding is concerned, it can be said that without these ** economists, there would be no reform today! There would not have been today's reforms!