A very troublesome thing about business management 20

At this time, you must help your relatives or not, and only by being fair and impartial in the company's affairs can you go far, and other employees of the company will be willing to do it with you. If you don't stand on the standpoint of reason, it is useless to only care about accommodating your relatives, it will only encourage their greed and desire, do bad things with good intentions, and finally you will become that "bad person". If you have the evidence and stand on the truth, then don't compromise, you must deal with it, if you don't deal with it sooner or later, it will be too late, and you may not be able to drag the company down, not to mention that there is no distinction between right and wrong, and you will take revenge on your relatives who will not help you when you are in trouble, and you will come to exploit you when you are developed, do you think such relatives will have affection for you?

If I had, I wouldn't have done anything like that. Of course, you can deal with it very tactfully, such as borrowing someone else's hand to find a professional manager, or arranging another position for them, cutting their rights for a long time, or you can even borrow wine to pretend to be "crazy" at a family dinner, open the skylight to say bright things, disclose their deeds, so that they can't talk bad about you anymore and make your little moves behind their backs, and then the next day you pretend that you don't know anything. After all, they are sorry for you first, and there is no need to let them bully you again and again.

You can change their position and raise it, and your salary can increase a little, but don't give them a small amount of power, just say that considering that it is their relatives who can't make them too tired, let them do some small things that are easier but have little impact on the company, and then leave the accounting to others.

First of all, how big is your scale, and the production of small family-style workshops also has its advantages, of course, after the scale gradually grows, there will be more contradictions, inconsistencies, and self-contained ideas, which is very unfavorable to its own development.

Listening to what you say, it should be on a small scale, and it is estimated that they are still engaged in procurement.

This is the same as the ancient emperors, before the emperor, they were reused, because they were your cronies, and they were called emperors, and in order to stabilize their own country, they could only kill them.

It's always been like this.

Figure out for yourself what you're going to do on your own scale.

If the scale is large, if you don't let them do it, you will pay them dividends every year.

Let's talk about the concept of management first, that is, to manage things and manage people, that is, when there is something, you don't need to say it, and the employees below will consciously do it themselves. Management is to manage the daily life of your employees, only if you are responsible for the employees, then your management night will be successful. Management should have grace, scenery, outline, line, province and so on.

In your case, I suggest you take a look at the book "A Letter of Resignation", which I believe will be of great help. At the same time, I wish your business to rise step by step.

The problem that is very easy to solve, one, you ask someone to take care of it for you, borrow his hand to do it, you can't do it. I don't think this method is appropriate, so I can only use the golden cicada to get out of the shell; I think you are engaged in business management, you should be able to use it, this is the best way, no one can be offended, no one can say bad things about you.

Find a time and ask them to go. If you can't change it, you can only leave.

has clearly explained the key tasks of his subordinates, and at the same time, he has been reminded both openly and secretly that he needs to complete it as soon as possible. However, day after day there is no movement, what to do?

When a subordinate gets off work, go and look at his desk, is it neatly organized? If so, it means that he is indeed slacking off, and he has the time and ability to do his part well; If it is chaotic, it means that he is in a state of fighting fires everywhere during the day, and Gao You does not have enough time, as we all know: non-important and non-urgent things will make people indulge in it and enjoy it, because it can bring people an illusory sense of achievement; Then there are things related to one's own interests (reimbursement of requisition, house decoration and housework, etc.), and people's normal feelings must also be prioritized.

To determine whether it is passive and sabotage, it is undoubtedly necessary to explain thoroughly how people and things are in place and why the six elements are in place, and point out the key points of not completing it in time.

The above is the method, it is the technical aspect, and the final solution still comes down to leadership. No matter what kind of situation the bureau encounters, the manager must be calm and light in front of his subordinates, and he is not impatient or impatient. If you are in a hurry, you will lose.

You don't see it, under the sun, everything is thriving and grows naturally.

I'm very interested in what you have to say, and I'll talk to you about it. It is normal for a company to complain, if a backbone or management cadre has a negative situation, the company should consider whether there is really something that needs to be improved, and the second is whether the cadre or backbone really recognizes the team. The core people of a company's team are crucial, and if the core is off track, assess the reasons for the deviation; Maybe this core person is no longer the core that the current team needs?

I often tell the staff in meetings (to bring the letter to Garcia's story), hoping that the core cadres will have more responsibility and less reason.

When it comes to the issue of employee salary, if a real talent is priceless. However, more often than not, there is a need for ordinary executives. Therefore, there is a system in the implementation of the salary level of each position in a company, so does a personnel have the final decision-making power?

Should there be an approval system to regulate it?

Therefore, trust is good, and the system is better.

The more complete the system, the better. It depends on the current development period of your company, and it is a win-win situation to formulate a system suitable for the current development model. The growth of a company will lead to the growth of employees.

The above is a personal immature opinion, welcome to exchange, criticism.

I won't say anything lofty, but my experience is that a word from the boss's mouth will change through a department, and then convey to the next department and change, this is not to say that the boss has to do everything himself, maybe many times the boss under the people do not act or fake as a cause of dissatisfaction among employees, a harmonious working environment, is the need to understand each other, many companies have dissatisfaction, but some companies can handle it well, this is actually the boss of the department that shares worries, It is not easy to appease employees and complete the workload, and it is recommended that the boss can find the following employees separately to ask what the situation is, and do not blindly listen to others' reports.

Hehe, so have you thought about it from the perspective of employees?